I stated before that the first election of the Donald was comedy, the second election is tragedy.

And I doubt that he will escape a tragic consequence.

The current situation might be a reflection of a new class warfare in the USA.

It was noted even before he took office.


And then again 6 months ago when he went after lawyers and colleges as President just a few months into his 2nd term.


He obviously won't be liquidating the professional-managerial class like they are Kulaks or anything. :hmm:
That is for Musk and his robot/AI army to replace them in their jobs.


Eh, I'm sure historians will work out what is currently happening, and put it in a future game of Civ!

The term late-stage capitalism itself implies something further is ahead.
I wonder what it will be?
 
Last edited:

Entire White House East Wing to be demolished within days​

US President Donald Trump has said the "existing structure" of the White House East Wing must be torn down in order to construct a new $250m (£186m) ballroom.

Crews began demolishing parts of the structure on Monday, and two administration officials earlier told the BBC's US partner CBS that it will be completely torn down by the weekend.

It marks a significant expansion of the construction project announced over the summer. Trump previously said his ballroom addition would not "interfere with the current building".

He rejected accusations he had not been transparent over the extent of the works, telling reporters on Wednesday: "I think we've been more transparent than anyone's ever been."

The White House has served as the historic home of the US president for two centuries. The East Wing was constructed in 1902 and was last modified in 1942.

It is a section of the White House that holds offices for the first lady and other staff, as well as special events.

Trump said the building was "never thought of as much" and that the changes have been wanted "for at least 150 years".

He said the construction was being fully funded by him and "some friends of mine - donors". The military is also involved, he added.

The US president announced construction had begun in a social media post on Monday, saying "ground has been broken" on the "much-needed" ballroom space.

"For more than 150 years, every President has dreamt about having a Ballroom at the White House to accommodate people for grand parties, State Visits, etc," he wrote.

He said that the East Wing was "completely separate" from the White House, although it is attached to the main structure.

The Trump administration officials told CBS it was always the case that the East Wing would have to be modernised to enhance security and technology, but that during the planning process, it became apparent that the best option would be to demolish the entirety of the East Wing.

Trump has called the construction "music to my ears".

"You probably hear the beautiful sound of construction in the back... When I hear that sound, it reminds me of money," he told senators from his Republican Party at the White House on Tuesday.

His comments came after the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a Washington non-profit organisation that protects historic US sites, wrote a letter to White House officials saying it was "deeply concerned" by the project.

The trust asked Trump to pause demolition work, arguing that the White House was a national historic landmark and that officials needed to hold a public review process of the plan for the ballroom.

Some Democrats have been critical of the renovation, including Hilary Clinton, who ran against Trump for the US presidency in 2016.

In a post on X, she wrote that the White House was not Trump's house, and "he's destroying it".
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxn7lwzx5po
 

US axes website for reporting human rights abuses by US-armed foreign forces​

The US State Department has removed an online portal for reporting alleged human rights violations by foreign military units supplied with American weapons.

The Human Rights Reporting Gateway (HRG) acted as a formal "tip line" to the US government.

It was the only publicly accessible channel of its kind for organisations or individuals to inform it directly of potentially serious abuses by US-armed foreign forces.

Its deletion has been condemned by human rights campaigners and by a senior congressional aide who drafted the law requiring it. The State Department insisted it was still abiding by the law.

The portal was established in 2022 following pressure on successive administrations to abide by updated provisions of the Leahy Law, named after former US Senator Patrick Leahy. These require the government to "facilitate receipt" of information on alleged gross violations of human rights by military units supplied by Washington.

Among the cases submitted via the HRG was the alleged excessive use of force by security forces during anti-government protests in Colombia, while several cases were due to be submitted relating to US-armed units of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in the occupied West Bank, according to Amnesty International.

Tim Rieser, former senior aide to Senator Leahy who wrote the 2011 amendment mandating information gathering, told the BBC the gateway's removal meant the State Department was "clearly ignoring the law".

He added it was a further sign that "the entire human rights architecture" within the department was being "rendered largely ineffective".

"The United States will find itself supporting foreign security forces that commit heinous crimes even though nothing is done about it," said Mr Rieser. "As a result there will be less incentive for foreign governments to bring people who commit such crimes to justice."

In response, the US State Department insisted it was continuing to receive reports regarding gross violations of human rights and was engaging with "credible organisations" on a full spectrum of human rights concerns. It said: "The Department abides by its legal requirements".

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has overseen a sweeping reorganisation of the State Department involving widespread layoffs and eliminating some offices focused on human rights monitoring. The department this year released a slimmed-down annual human rights report which critics said omitted alleged crimes by US allies but included those by foreign leaders the Trump administration opposes.

The department has previously said its restructure made it leaner and more efficient and followed President Trump's "America First" foreign policy which sees some human rights promotion as ideologically driven.

Charles Blaha, former Director of the Office of Security and Human Rights at the State Department, said people in the field would now have "no established channel" for reporting gross violations of human rights by foreign security forces.

The government's ability to deter abuses was "severely weakened", said Mr Blaha who is now an adviser to the Washington-based think tank Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN).

The BBC learned during the summer that the HRG site was earmarked for deletion. Its removal was highlighted by DAWN in August but has not previously been acknowledged by the State Department. The BBC confirmed this week that officials phased out the reporting channel during the department's restructure.

Screengrabs of the portal taken by the BBC before its deletion show it asked for information on US-armed foreign military units involved in alleged abuses including extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, torture and rape. It required extensive details to ensure credible reporting including unit names, identities of alleged perpetrators, specific locations and dates.

Blaha had already voiced frustration that despite the HRG passing its pilot phase, the Biden administration had not done enough to publicise it, meaning the provision to "facilitate receipt" of information was still not being fully honoured before the Trump administration deleted the channel entirely.

The US is the world's biggest contributor of military aid to foreign countries, supplying funding, equipment, training and arms to more than 150 nations. Its vetting procedures to prevent arms going to units involved in breaches of international law have evolved over the years, with the 1997 legislation named after Senator Leahy being one its major pillars.

At the heart of the law is Congress sending a message to the administration that taxpayer funding cannot support human rights abuses abroad, says Amanda Klasing, who oversees government relations at Amnesty International USA.

"If I'm a member of Congress, my perspective is: 'I want to protect my constituents and their taxpayer funding from going to torturers or people that kill their own citizens for protesting," she told the BBC.

Klasing oversaw the compilation and submission of several reports to the Human Rights Reporting Gateway.

These included allegations that American arms were used by Colombian security forces during mass anti-government protests in 2021, in which at least 47 people were killed and many wounded according to the group. Amnesty says among the arms were US-supplied high-capacity launchers for stun and smoke grenades.

Klasing says she had also gathered evidence relating to the killing of 20 Palestinians during IDF raids in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank in October and November 2023. Amnesty was preparing to submit its report on these incidents to the HRG before its deletion.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqx30vnwd4do
 
It is a bit weird that no one seems to get the trick there, he's comparing constitutional mechanisms designed to prevent the concentration of power in a single person to bureaucratic "red tape" (such as tax code complexity) in order to make a fascist argument that the President's power to act should not be limited by the law.
Just caught this Daily Show short. Pretty good catch delivered by by Jon Stewart:

TL;DR - Numerous grievances voiced in the US Declaration of Independence against King George III eerily mirror the current things Trump is doing...

As an aside, one notable exception is in the last grievance listed... the part about "merciless Indian Savages" (yes, that phrase appears in the US Declaration of Independence).
 
Last edited:
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: (...)
 
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
Likely refers to this :
A few episodes of the extreme brutalities of war were not uncommon. The case of Jane McCrea being scalped by warriors attached to a British Loyalist assault galvanized Patriot support and helped lead to British Gen. John Burgoyne’s defeat at Saratoga in October 1777. Other barbarities towards natives at the hands of Patriot forces were reported too. Both sides resorted to striking fear into the hearts and minds of their adversaries, and cases of savagery, mutilation, and the murder of women and children occurred out of sight of the British and American regular armies. These were effective propaganda shows.
 

After President Donald Trump touted yet another meeting with his benefactor/murderous dictator Vladimir Putin Thursday, this time in Budapest, HuffPost contacted his top spokespeople at the White House with an obvious question: Why Budapest?
After all, the Hungarian capital was the site of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Ukraine gave up the thousands of nuclear weapons it had inherited upon the breakup of the Soviet Union in return for assurances that Russia would respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Putin broke that promise with his 2014 invasion and annexation of Crimea, with his decade-long military offensive in the Donbas region, and then with his all-out invasion in 2022. He continues killing Ukrainian civilians in their homes to this day with regular drone and missile attacks.
Given all that, HuffPost asked the White House: Who picked Budapest?

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded minutes later with: “Your mom did.”
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung after a minute added the far more succinct: “Your mom.”

After HuffPost asked Leavitt if she thought her response was funny, she replied:
“It’s funny to me that you actually consider yourself a journal [sic]. You are a far left hack who nobody takes seriously, including your colleagues in the media, they just don’t tell you that to your face. Stop texting me your disingenuous, biased, and bullfeathers questions.”
HuffPost is devastated, and is fearful of asking any more questions, let alone escalating with “I’m rubber, you’re glue,” or some such.

...
 
US police and politicians widely spread disinformation about gangs

An unverified rumor that Venezuelan gang members were preparing to kill police officers spread like wildfire through US law enforcement agencies last year, internal records reveal, only for federal officials to later quietly acknowledge the claim was mistaken.

The intelligence report, which appears to have first been disseminated by a local New Mexico police department in July 2024, suggested that the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang had directed its members to “fire on or attack” law enforcement. The vague assertion quickly traveled among law enforcement agencies. It even made its way into a formal proclamation by Texas governor Greg Abbott, and was repeated by Republican Congress members as evidence of the dangers of Venezuelan immigrants and Democrats’ border policies.

Months later, however, the Federal Bureau of Investigation wrote in an internal report that claims of a TdA “directive to actively target US law enforcement” were inaccurate.

There has been no public acknowledgement of misstatements.

TdA began in a prison in the Venezuelan state of Aragua, and experts say there is no evidence the group has a clearly organized structure in the US, strongly rejecting claims of an “invasion”. Allegations of a TdA call to attack police were especially far-fetched, scholars said.
 
The next political pressure point for the government shut down will begin in November.

SNAP which gives food money to about 40 million people will not be able to load money onto their cards between November 1st to November 10th to buy groceries for that month.

Some estimates say up to 2/3rd's or partial benefits can still be paid out with existing money.
Will have to keep an eye on it.


Congress' paychecks will not be affected by the government shutdown of course.

Still not sure how long Trump can magic the money for the military.

November is definitely the pain month for federal workers.
 
Congress' paychecks will not be affected by the government shutdown of course.

Should be noted that legally, as in the Article 1 Section 6 Clause 1 of the Constitution, Congress critters must be payed. Also, amendment 27 prevents Congress from messing with their pay legally.


Fox News is praising Hamburger Helper's surge in sales, which usually means folks are striggling.

 

Trump’s ‘election integrity’ chief claimed president has future powers to declare voting emergency​

It was clear from the outset that Donald Trump’s administration would include high-ranking government officials who either endorsed his false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him, or refused to publicly admit he lost.

The president continues to hammer a baseless narrative that the election was rigged against him, vowing publicly that it must never “happen again” as he deploys officials to prepare for midterm elections with the balance of power in Congress — and his agenda — at stake.

Before she was tapped as Trump’s “election integrity” official at the Department of Homeland Security, Heather Honey reportedly told a group of right-wing activists in March that the president could declare a “national emergency” to effectively take control of local election administration.

She said the move would follow an “actual investigation” of the 2020 election, if it revealed “manipulation” of the results, according to The New York Times, which had a recording of the call.

“We have some additional powers that don’t exist right now,” she said. “[W]e can take these other steps without Congress and we can mandate that states do things and so on.”

She added that she does not know whether such federal control of elections would be “feasible” or if the people surrounding the president “would let him test that theory.”

But in the months that followed, the president has launched an aggressive effort to radically reshape elections, from redrawing congressional maps to promising an executive order he says would eliminate mail-in voting altogether.

“We’re going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they’re corrupt,” Trump said in August.

Trump has also backed a measure from Republicans in Congress that would upend how states register people to vote online or through automatic or same-day registration, an effort fueled by a bogus claim that noncitizens are fraudulently voting in federal elections.

“We don’t want it to happen again. We can never let what happened in the 2020 election happen again,” Trump said in the Oval Office Tuesday.

He suggested FBI director Kash Patel and intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard are investigating the results.

“I know Kash is working on it. Everybody’s working on it. And certainly Tulsi is working on it. We can’t let that happen again to our country,” he said.

Heather Honey also alarmed state election officials on a call last month where she reportedly infused a discussion about voting safeguards with rhetoric that echoed right-wing conspiracy theories.

On the September 11 call with the National Association of Secretaries of State Elections Committee, she discussed her current role and Homeland Security’s election security-related work, among other issues, a group spokesperson told The Independent.

Honey, a protege of prominent election conspiracy theorist Cleta Mitchell, was tapped earlier this year to serve as deputy assistant secretary for election integrity in Homeland Security’s Office of Strategy, Policy and Plans to oversee the nation’s election infrastructure.

But she complained that the agency’s employees tasked with combating election misinformation had “strayed from their mission,” according to The New York Times.

She also mentioned a report routinely touted by conspiracy theorists to support bogus claims that voting machines were rigged to favor Democrats, The Times reported, citing people familiar with the call.

Top administration officials have repeatedly refused to admit Trump lost the 2020 election, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, who repeatedly evaded answering affirmatively that Joe Biden won during her under-oath Senate confirmation hearing.

But officials who explicitly embraced Trump’s election lies are working across the government in positions that critics fear could be weaponized against election administration.


Kurt Olsen, a former Trump campaign lawyer who worked on “Stop the Steal” efforts to overturn election results, is working for the administration as a “special government employee,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

He is reportedly “asking intelligence agencies for information about the 2020 election,” including voting machines, the WSJ reported.

Ed Martin, another “Stop the Steal” lawyer and defense attorney for January 6 rioters, was tapped to lead a “weaponization working group” at the Department of Justice to review what he believes are “political” prosecutions against the president.

Marci McCarthy, who spread false claims about voting machines in Georgia when she was chair of the DeKalb County Republican Party, also was hired as director of public affairs at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, in Homeland Security.


Nearly all of CISA’s election experts were purged from the agency earlier this year.

After hearing about the administration’s cuts to the agency, state officials left last month’s call with Honey “confused and anxious” as she “made unspecified claims of censorship at the agency,” according to The Times.

She reportedly also referred to a report that right-wing activists have used to undermine voting machines and suggested states would plan to use “fusion centers” — law enforcement collaborations typically used for large-scale events like the Super Bowl — for election security issues.

The CISA cuts have dismantled “nearly all” of Homeland Security’s capacity to protect election infrastructure, according to David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research

“The hiring of an election conspiracy theorist with no election knowledge or expertise is the culmination of this reversal,” Becker told ProPublica earlier this year. “DHS now appears poised to become a primary amplifier of false election conspiracies pushed by our enemies.”


The Independent has requested comment from DHS.

“Anyone who cares about the right to vote needs to be clear-eyed about what’s at stake right now,” Joanna Lydgate, CEO of the States United Democracy Center, said in a statement to The Independent. “We know who these people are, the lies they've told about elections, and the actions they've taken to undermine our system. It’s now more important than ever to be paying attention to what they’re saying and doing because they have the backing of the federal government.”

The Independent is the world’s most free-thinking news brand, providing global news, commentary and analysis for the independently-minded. We have grown a huge, global readership of independently minded individuals, who value our trusted voice and commitment to positive change. Our mission, making change happen, has never been as important as it is today.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/...oting-emergency/ar-AA1OZeFE?ocid=BingNewsSerp
 

Entire White House East Wing to be demolished within days​

US President Donald Trump has said the "existing structure" of the White House East Wing must be torn down in order to construct a new $250m (£186m) ballroom.

Crews began demolishing parts of the structure on Monday, and two administration officials earlier told the BBC's US partner CBS that it will be completely torn down by the weekend.

It marks a significant expansion of the construction project announced over the summer. Trump previously said his ballroom addition would not "interfere with the current building".

He rejected accusations he had not been transparent over the extent of the works, telling reporters on Wednesday: "I think we've been more transparent than anyone's ever been."

The White House has served as the historic home of the US president for two centuries. The East Wing was constructed in 1902 and was last modified in 1942.

It is a section of the White House that holds offices for the first lady and other staff, as well as special events.

Trump said the building was "never thought of as much" and that the changes have been wanted "for at least 150 years".

He said the construction was being fully funded by him and "some friends of mine - donors". The military is also involved, he added.

The US president announced construction had begun in a social media post on Monday, saying "ground has been broken" on the "much-needed" ballroom space.

"For more than 150 years, every President has dreamt about having a Ballroom at the White House to accommodate people for grand parties, State Visits, etc," he wrote.

He said that the East Wing was "completely separate" from the White House, although it is attached to the main structure.

The Trump administration officials told CBS it was always the case that the East Wing would have to be modernised to enhance security and technology, but that during the planning process, it became apparent that the best option would be to demolish the entirety of the East Wing.

Trump has called the construction "music to my ears".

"You probably hear the beautiful sound of construction in the back... When I hear that sound, it reminds me of money," he told senators from his Republican Party at the White House on Tuesday.

His comments came after the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a Washington non-profit organisation that protects historic US sites, wrote a letter to White House officials saying it was "deeply concerned" by the project.

The trust asked Trump to pause demolition work, arguing that the White House was a national historic landmark and that officials needed to hold a public review process of the plan for the ballroom.

Some Democrats have been critical of the renovation, including Hilary Clinton, who ran against Trump for the US presidency in 2016.

In a post on X, she wrote that the White House was not Trump's house, and "he's destroying it".
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxn7lwzx5po
This is genuinely hilarious lol. I hope he knocks down the whole thing at this point.
 
Anyway, for the more reasonable and architecturally-inclined people out there, it actually looks pretty nice. Now, the next president will have to upgrade the West Wing to balance things out.
1761257049283.png
 
Back
Top Bottom