Turn off postcount for Site Feedback?

Originally posted by RealGoober


Hehe, this coming from the person who has the highest PC on the site . . .

He only has the highest if your talking about being active. Curt has a bit higher post count then CG. CG is short by almost a thousand of being #1.
 
Originally posted by anarres
Alexnm, thank you for proving my point! :)

Hey, I never said I would spam the OT forum! As a matter of fact, I rarely post there. Sure, I could spam that forum if I wanted, but I could do it in any other forum here too.

As for disabling the post count for some sections of the forum, it does nothing to stop spam. Believe me, I know. In this other forum I visit, they have disabled postcount in their OT section and spam only got worse... The mods there have to work hard everyday... ;)
 
Originally posted by MarineCorps


He only has the highest if your talking about being active. Curt has a bit higher post count then CG. CG is short by almost a thousand of being #1.

But I know I'll reach it and I dread the day. :(
 
Originally posted by superslug

Just a quick question out of honest curiousity:
Why not disable post count for all forums not Civ related?

I agree. Civ related posts are more likely to help players.
 
Originally posted by MarineCorps


He only has the highest if your talking about being active. Curt has a bit higher post count then CG. CG is short by almost a thousand of being #1.

Oh, i didn't know this. Still, PC doesn't mean much, it is just a number. And the PPD (Post Per Day) really just signifies how little of a life you have . . .

As I have stated before PC doesn't mean much, if anything. I wouldn't mind seeing it gone, and seeing something more useful (maybe like which time zone the person is in) being put in.
 
Originally posted by RealGoober


Why should the postcount even be here? Comtemplating it over dinner, I have failed to come up with a single decent explaination as to why we even have the postCount in the first place. I see the reason for the Status, etc., but NOT the postcount. Why don't we get rid of the Postcount completely?

Ok, maybe we could have the postcount to 300, to show you are commited enough to this site to get your own avatar, i see the purpose there, but then why after that? I mean, all it does is create useless threads like this one (no offense . . . ). Also, it is just more unecessary information for the internet to load when you access this site.

I agree on that, but it were going to count some, we should count them all.
 
As a lurker of many other forums, I can say that postcount really benefits lurkers a lot. It's a bit hard to explain, but it does help in showing who's really active and well known, who is new, who has been here a long time but doesn't post, who loves to spam, etc. It's true that it changes nothing about the validity of the posts, but it really does help. I can't explain it, but it makes it easier to find the feel of the forum. Agh, I can't explain this at all. But don't hide postcount. At the very least put it in the profile, or maybe make an option whether to hide postcount or not for users, but don't get rid of it completely.
 
Originally posted by Silverflame
As a lurker of many other forums, I can say that postcount really benefits lurkers a lot. It's a bit hard to explain, but it does help in showing who's really active and well known, who is new, who has been here a long time but doesn't post, who loves to spam, etc. It's true that it changes nothing about the validity of the posts, but it really does help. I can't explain it, but it makes it easier to find the feel of the forum. Agh, I can't explain this at all. But don't hide postcount. At the very least put it in the profile, or maybe make an option whether to hide postcount or not for users, but don't get rid of it completely.

Now here are truly some excellent points I had not thought of before. I actually completely agree with what was stated above. I never though of PC's that way, but now that one think about it, PC's are really an expression of how much that user posts on this site, is it not? I am now seeing the light, so to speak. THIS was truly the answer I was looking for, but could not see my self (Arg, I'm getting philisophical again . . . HELP!!!).

Yup, I have to agree, do not get rid of the PC. It does have a purpose, after all . . . seperating the people whom use this site a lot, and post here a lot, the Spammers - depending on what is considered "Spam" - and those lurkers, those that just browse, and occaisionally post, yet have been here for ages. I still think that maybe you should have to go to the User's profile to see their PC, I am not sure that is needs to be so front and center (hehe, Spammers may want to stay hidden . . . ). Anyway, an answer, thanks a Bunch!!!
 
The thing that gets me is, if people don't want a high post-count, why do they insist on making spammy threads asking that it be abolished/theirs be dropped, when that is just going to add to their post count and make matters worse? A PM would be more in order.
I relate post-count to how much someone knows about Civ -- which is horribly wrong -- so making it only apply the Civ Fora seems logical to me...
 
Originally posted by Gainy bo
I relate post-count to how much someone knows about Civ -- which is horribly wrong -- so making it only apply the Civ Fora seems logical to me...

I could pretty much spam a lot in the civ fora and it wouldn't mean that I know a lot about civ.
 
Originally posted by Silverflame
As a lurker of many other forums, I can say that postcount really benefits lurkers a lot. It's a bit hard to explain, but it does help in showing who's really active and well known, who is new, who has been here a long time but doesn't post, who loves to spam, etc. It's true that it changes nothing about the validity of the posts, but it really does help. I can't explain it, but it makes it easier to find the feel of the forum. Agh, I can't explain this at all. But don't hide postcount. At the very least put it in the profile, or maybe make an option whether to hide postcount or not for users, but don't get rid of it completely.


This is exactly why it should be hidden! It encourages people to make judgements on what people are posting not by content, but based solely on a metric that indicates peoples propensity to post: more indicative of how much time they have on their hands than on insight and knowledge (please note that I am not implying that they are mutually exclusive).

As an example, (without mentioning specific names), there are four or five people who I regard as excellent Civ3 players, who have an intimate knowledge of the game strategies and mechanics. Yet they have very low postcounts.
 
But it would mean you spent alot of time there, thus picking up on things. If not, then it wouldn't really matter, as people would know just how spammy you were, and just ignore any bit of advice you give anyways ;)

Note: This post was in regard to alexnm... I agree with Ainwood though, the two posters I respect the most on this site have a post count which totals to <2k methinks, even though this is alot, it's not as substantial as some...
 
I still feel that post-count does not imply knowledge.
I know! Which is my point. I'm merely saying, restricting it to Civ Fora would at least give an idea of who spends time there, and who doesn't. Although for me, the date registered, combined with the amount of posts (a few hundred) gives a kind of respect from me(sad as it sounds) --- if that's from the Civ Forum(s).

I disagree with what i'm saying myself, surely you understand though?
YOur implying that those who spend all their time spamming are interested in reading as well. May or may-not be true.

If it's obvious that people spam without reading, then it shouldn't matter.
 
It is obvious to me that post count gives a status. People with high postcounts have been critised in the Civ3 fora because we " are an elite group" and didn't care for the people that lurked or rarely posted.

That troubles me, because I think that we should listen to reason, not postcounts.

I would like to see the postcount hidden. And if that's not possible, don't count posts that are non-civ related.
 
Originally posted by The Person
I see Silverflame's point, too, RG. You registered two months later than me, but you have about three times as many posts as me...

AAAHHHHHH!!! Why is it that people are going at me on this issue? You guys must know I have no, or very little Social Life, and waste many a good hour on CFC (after hw, of course). I have opinions on many subjects, and I express them, thus the reason that I have my high post count. plus, I usually post in the OT, and after being in there for awhile, your PC skyrockets. But PC doesn't mean anything (after getting 300 for your Custom Avatar . . . ). A good poster with good ideas, does not need 10,000 posts, because the PC is just a number, and cannot represent that person. I would still like to see PC put in the User profile, I do not see why it has to be out in the open (everyone getting on my case about my PC, sheesh . . . ) . . .
 
Post Count should be eliminated. Period.
 
Originally posted by RealGoober
Why is it that people are going at me on this issue?
Probably because you're going at us so hard about it by posting on the issue at a very high frequency.

Originally posted by RealGoober
You guys must know I have no, or very little Social Life, and waste many a good hour on CFC (after hw, of course).
What are you looking for with this statement? Pity? Contempt? Your hours are 'waste'? Does this suggest you're not being constructive with your time here? Spamming perhaps?

Originally posted by RealGoober
I have opinions on many subjects, and I express them, thus the reason that I have my high post count.
Yes, and it's fine that you express them but the problem is that you express them so much. You've practically threadjacked the entire Feedback forum. Give it a rest...
 
@ superslug, rrriiiiggghhhttt . . . in response to your responses . . .

And I have created a Poll, located here to gauge the amount of support to this proposal of changing post Count (well, proposals, I guess . . . )
 
Back
Top Bottom