Unit Request Thread 3

Rude? Where am I rude? Next time you ask something, instead of taking some time to find you a link of a possible unit, I'll abstain then.


Of course, we shoud immediately know from this statement alone that you indeed went in the download database and didn't like the unit there... If you had said so, it would have been a lot more obvious, don't you think?

Maybe you don't realise it Steph, but you have a very condescending tone when you write. I've observed your interactions with other people on here and it's something you do all the time. Maybe you should work on your people skills before you turn people off from coming here. I'm not the only person you've ever offended, because you don't realise how abrasive you sound.

Most people would have said, "hey there's this unit that could work.."

I could do without the condescending attitude--and especially when I already did browse the entire library, noticed that unit, and also noticed it was historically inaccurate. I even took care to make note of the positioning so that the mistake isn't made again.

Of course, we shoud immediately know from this statement alone that you indeed went in the download database and didn't like the unit there... If you had said so, it would have been a lot more obvious, don't you think?

No, that's besides the pont:

You should have realised that recommending a unit holding the weapon the opposite way, when I specifically said the correct way, is pretty useless...

don't you think?
 
You should have realised that recommending a unit holding the weapon the opposite way, when I specifically said the correct way, is pretty useless...
don't you think?
I think you should read carefully what you wrote the first time.
You just said "I want the weapon facing in that direction".
You never said "unlike the one in the download database", or "the one in the database is not correct".
There are many reasons why you could have made this comment (read a book, seen a picture and think it's important, etc), it doesn't necessarilly mean you dislike the existing unit. You may very well have not seen it.

This being said, enough of thread jacking, and back to unit request.
 
I think you should read carefully what you wrote the first time.
You just said "I want the weapon facing in that direction".
You never said "unlike the one in the download database", or "the one in the database is not correct".
There are many reasons why you could have made this comment (read a book, seen a picture and think it's important, etc), it doesn't necessarilly mean you dislike the existing unit. You may very well have not seen it.

This being said, enough of thread jacking, and back to unit request.

If you folllowed your own advice and read what I posted, before typing, you would have realised that recommending that unit is pointless--because I explicitly stated it was wielding the weapon incorrectly.

Do you understand that whether I knew that unit was in the library or not doesn't change a thing?

You don't seem to understand that judging by your last response.


Why would you recommend that unit? It means:

A: You didn't follow your own advice and read before posting.

or...

B: You lack reading comprehension.

I tend to think the answer is your ego can't allow you to admit you were wrong.
 
Moderator Action: All right - Steph, you can be rather abrupt at times. JPHX - he may have been abrupt there, but he was still trying to help. Minor faults on both sides in this case, I think. Let's see no more of it here please.
 
I would like to see made this:
 

Attachments

  • 064.jpg
    064.jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 187
  • carro_pioniere1.jpg
    carro_pioniere1.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 169
  • trivella.jpg
    trivella.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 164
Hallo :)
Could someone create such a unit , please? :)

1 - the anatomical details...
2 - basis in life, very realistic image (maybe except ears).
3 - the appearance in fight. Copyright Nikolai Kovalev

maybe like this, some the pictures will be visible? - i don't know, which code will work for this forum:

1/ anatomical details


<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s54.radikal.ru/i143/0906/56/f4ce352c6380.jpg.html"><img src="http://s54.radikal.ru/i143/0906/56/f4ce352c6380t.jpg" ></a>


<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s49.radikal.ru/i123/0906/7b/d1ae10ea8337.gif.html"><img src="http://s49.radikal.ru/i123/0906/7b/d1ae10ea8337t.jpg" ></a>

2a. - general (Copyright Nikolai Kovalev)

<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s41.radikal.ru/i091/0906/db/8f7d88e1acb6.jpg.html"><img src="http://s41.radikal.ru/i091/0906/db/8f7d88e1acb6t.jpg" ></a>


2b. - general (Copyright Nikolai Kovalev)

<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s45.radikal.ru/i109/0906/05/6102eefdc215.jpg.html"><img src="http://s45.radikal.ru/i109/0906/05/6102eefdc215t.jpg" ></a>


2c. - general (Copyright Nikolai Kovalev)

<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s40.radikal.ru/i090/0906/1b/1534197d4301.jpg.html"><img src="http://s40.radikal.ru/i090/0906/1b/1534197d4301t.jpg" ></a>



2d. - general (no idea whose canvas is that)

<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/s44.radikal.ru/i105/0906/13/7bc33629785b.jpg.html"><img src="http://s44.radikal.ru/i105/0906/13/7bc33629785bt.jpg" ></a>


3. - comparison (Copyright Nikolai Kovalev)


4. - fight (Copyright Nikolai Kovalev)

<a target="_blank" href="http://radikal.ru/F/i028.radikal.ru/0906/c0/1a919308087c.jpg.html"><img src="http://i028.radikal.ru/0906/c0/1a919308087ct.jpg" ></a>
 
I apologize if this has already been requested or already exists, but I've wandered through this forum for years now and have never seen a generic modern King unit. Just a guy in a suit (with a Civ-specific tie, perhaps?) I think would be a great addition to the Civ III canon.
 
I apologize. That idea seems to have silenced this thread.
 
That's because nobody has anything to request.

I think there is a scientist unit in the industrial downloads section somewhere, that might work for you.
 
Stinger and/or SA7

I have "searched" there doesnt appear to be be a Stinger or SA7 unit ( apart from the SAM animation for the the RPG gunner)

Given the importance of this piece of equipment could somebody please create one ?

Would it be too difficult to make a Stinger version and then an SA7 version ( the animation could be the same , just a "uniform" change )

If this had already been requested I am sorry if this a "bump" , but I have looked carefully through the 3 Unit Request threads going back to 2002 and not found anything.

Many thanks to the talented people who create units for us others to enjoy
 
Top Bottom