RedRalph
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 20,708
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2189560,00.html
Surely the time for Air strikes has long passed?
Surely the time for Air strikes has long passed?
mercenary seems too nice a word, more like death-squads in the making. next thing you know the US gov't will be contracting to blackwater for their 'superior' interrogation techniques. non-state actors with immunity and therefore no accountability seem like such a self-evident no-no. they have less than a thousand people, it seems like it would not burden the US military too much to provide the needed security to US personnel. at least then they would be accountable under the geneva convention. the military industrial congressional complex, world peace is bad for the bottom line and doesn't fare well at the polls especially amongst out-of-work boeing employees who have way too much time to vote. war is corporately democratic and is the american way. convert to americanism or die!
![]()
I'm thinking how I might be able to offer terminology assistance. Instead of "mercenaries", or indeed "non-state actors with immunity and therefore no accountability", which is something of a mouthful, how about "unlawful enemy combatants"?
![]()
I'm thinking how I might be able to offer terminology assistance. Instead of "mercenaries", or indeed "non-state actors with immunity and therefore no accountability", which is something of a mouthful, how about "unlawful enemy combatants"?
The Iraqi Government said they were civilians, their deceased family members said they were, their neighbours said they were, human rights groups have too, independent observers (like the press) also confirmed, and the freakin' US Government admitted they were civilians and apologised for killing them. Do you want to resurrect them from the dead to testify to their "civilianness" just to be sure?Not that I'm a fan of Blackwater or anything and frankly I don't think PMCs should exist. BUT... how can we tell whether these were just civilians? They could well be terrorists that we just think are civilians.
![]()
I'm thinking how I might be able to offer terminology assistance. Instead of "mercenaries", or indeed "non-state actors with immunity and therefore no accountability", which is something of a mouthful, how about "unlawful enemy combatants"?
I agree. Using the term "unlawful enemy combatants" is always incorrect.If you want to be incorrect then by all means.
Stole the words right outta my keyboard.I agree. Using the term "unlawful enemy combatants" is always incorrect.
Stole the words right outta my keyboard.
Mobboss: Do please grow a sense of irony.
There is a certain subset of mercenaries that is immune from Iraqi law and does not fall under the UCMJ.What irony? They are still accountable and are indeed not 'immune' from prosecution.
Like I said, you are simply incorrect on your 'definition'. No more, no less.
What irony? They are still accountable and are indeed not 'immune' from prosecution.
Like I said, you are simply incorrect on your 'definition'. No more, no less.
See the posts above. Those guys are quicker to the thread than I.What irony? They are still accountable and are indeed not 'immune' from prosecution.
Like I said, you are simply incorrect on your 'definition'. No more, no less.
What!!? Just when the Afghan Government is also beginning to make noises about the lack of accountability for private security firms?!! (Check my source baby).OMFG drop the Blackwater issue already. There has been already two threads on it, I'm tired of debating it.
What!!? Just when the Afghan Government is also beginning to make noises about the lack of accountability for private security firms?!! (Check my source baby).
Also, the article in the OP is primarily about a US Army air strike killing civilians, not Blackwater. This largest loss of civilian life in recent times is reported in the context of the criticisms against private security firms.
There is a certain subset of mercenaries that is immune from Iraqi law and does not fall under the UCMJ.
Accountable to the laws of a foreign country whose pay they are under. Not to the laws of the country whose inhabitants they are butchering
See the posts above. Those guys are quicker to the thread than I.
Really, you should spend more time doing your research and getting your facts straight, on war and its accompanying legalities (your fortes as you like to think), than sitting on OT telling people they are incorrect. I've got better things to do than babysit you through them.
Also, you've still managed to miss the irony in what I posted, which wasn't really a 'definition'. You can lead a horse to water....as they say.