Versallies: A Flawed Peace

A Flawed Peace?

  • Yes

    Votes: 47 73.4%
  • No

    Votes: 17 26.6%
  • Dont Know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    64
Destroying the Ruhr would have been possible, but I doubt USA or even UK would have agreed. Both wanted to keep a now weaker Germany as a counterpart to France. France tried indeed again in 1918 as well as 1945 to get the left Rhine territories from Germany, but both was denied by UK and USA!
The real rpblem which lead to Hitler was Versailles. Although some allied pliticians like Briand saw this the de facto annullation of this treaty in´the 30s under Hitler was too late. Perhaps in 1930, during the big depression, this would have strenghenthed the weak democracy
 
Another point Marla said Germany was planing to invade France in 1914. This wasn´t planned in such way an invasion date was ready but the speed of mobbilization was much bigger than today, because Germany was prepared for a war which could break out every minute. Today no state in Europe or North America is ready for such a big war. In our times this is not possible, but in that time it was.
The marocco crisis were indeed started by both countries. Cameroon existed as German colony since 1885 in 1913 it got an area which is now a big part of the Republic Congo as a comparisation for Marocco claims.
Nevertheless the situation in 1914 was desparate. Everything was free for the way of the warriors. The dove had no chance. Later (1917) a war might not have occured but that´s only speculation.
Poland was devided three times. Poland in that time was nation. Prussia took parts of the country because Russia and Austria would have got taken everything. But the territory Prussia got in 1815 finally was Western Prussia and Danzig where mainly Germans lived and a connection with East Prussia was and once to Prussia belonged- and the mainly Polish province of Posen (now Poznan or so). In WW1 Polish troops fighted on Germany´s side to retake their country. This should happen. Poland should have been reestablished after the war as a puffer to Russia. Nevertheless it was not planned to give them German areas of course. Neverthless Germany would hav accepted the loss of Posen, but western Prussia was not acceptable in that times for all parties from the NSDAP to SPD (the communists I don´t know). The Polish way for a harbor should have been a unification with Lithunia again or even Memel with a corridor at the East Prussian border, but not tese better ways were not chosen.
At least I must say the politicians made a bad job in Versailles. It would have been far better to make a mild peace and a kind of EU even in that time, but perhaps the time was not ready for this.
Today of course the things were changed dramatically and this is only a historical debate. No one here claims anything from any nation. No one should feel offended by any post here.

Adler
 
Nevertheless it was not planned to give them German areas of course. Neverthless Germany would hav accepted the loss of Posen

You're so right. All that thing about Germany during WW1 was just kindness to give back Poland to poles. I guess Germans also invaded Belgium to free it actually. :love:

Come on ! All that was simply european Imperialism. Germans wanted to expand as they always did since the beginning of their unification. I'm not saying Germans were especially "bad guys"... just that it was the common spirit in that time. You don't have to say Germans were nice and simply wanted to free people when French were mean and vicious and wanted to avenge from 1871. Both were the same crap ! Looking for their own interests to defend. France wanted to defend its "rank" as colonial power and Germany wanted to increase its position as European leading power. There's no "kindness" in European wars... just the temptation of power.

And anyway, one century later, it's easy to realize Germans have won since they are ruling the EU.
 
I'm sorry Adler if I hurted you in insunuating you were a nationalist. Sincerly I'm sorry. My feeling is just that this thread isn't really interesting mostly because World War 1 wasn't really interesting in itself. ;)

My point wasn't to blindly defend France as Marla did. She's obviously a strong French patriot thinking her country could never be bad and that's plainly stupid. The only point I agree with her is that Versailles Treaty hasn't been the only disaster Germany had faced at that time. First, there was of course the Versailles Treaty. Second there were the war debts Germany had still to pay (War costs money). Both events lead Germany into a strong and untameable inflation. War debts are to me the main difference between 1871 and 1919.

Actually, all Europe was happy to see the war ending in 1918. It's not true when people say it didn't stop nationalism cause it did. France, Britain and many other countries were pacifist and careless in the 20's... All countries ? Except one ! Germany ! Germany were stuck in an inflation making people poorer and poorer everyday. :eek:

Inflation is the main reason why Weimar Republic didn't last in Germany as the third Republic did in France. In 1929, the black thursday was the final hit to knock out completely the brand new Republic. Germany were economically dependant on the USA and it's been the main european country really touched by the crisis. Germans were already poorer because of the inflation, now they were completely stuck into poverty. As you can see, there hasn't been only Versailles. In 1910, Germany was the greatest European nation whereas it was a country without dignity anymore in 1930. :(

Since inflation and economic crisis were considered as phenomenon on which we could do nothing, the only tangible event being considered as guilty of Germany's misfortune was the Versailles Treaty. If you look carefully, why Weimar Republic was endangered ? Was it because of Versailles Treaty or because of the failure of capitalism ? According to you for which damn' reason Germans were split between communists and nationalists at the beginning of the 30's ? Because of Versailles Treaty or because of poverty ? Was Versailles the only reason of that poverty ? French people didn't feel they were paying reparations to Germany after 1871 because they weren't poorer than before, if Germans felt it this way, it was because of the economic failure.

After such distasters, capitalism (and democracy) was burried in german minds, the only alternative models were communism and... some freaks calling for nationalism. The only reason why Hitler has won against the communists was his charisma and his fighting spirit. Hitler didn't hesitate to burn the Reichstag and to accuse the commies to get rid of them. Acting in such a way was very dangerous and if he did so, it's simply because it was the only way to beat the communists. Saying Versailles Treaty was an obvious call to wake up German Nationalism isn't totally true. It's Hitler who used it as a tool so that it would be the case. The Versailles Treaty was more a symbol than anything else : It was the symbol that the world wanted Germany to lose its dignity... that Germany's situation wasn't only economic misfortune... It's been made on purpose by others because that's what they wanted. :(

The result after is well known. Nationalism which had disappeared from Europe was suddenly strongly coming back in Germany. French and English opinion were still strongly pacifist at that time. People didn't want a war anymore and seeing Daladier and Chamberlain making everything to appease Hitler was quite natural. That's why I disagree with Hitro when he says that even without crisis, Hitler would have raised. It's the economy which has killed Weimar. If the economy were getting better, Hitler would have never come. I agree Versailles partially damaged German economy but it wasn't the only reason... post-1870's France prove that as many other example. :)
 
Originally posted by Sarevok
true, but this was a war that niether side had hoped for or expected...
A war never occurs when it's not wanted. Who have attacked the first ? Who have broken Belgian neutrality ? :rolleyes:

Maybe Germany didn't want that war afterwards, but during the war, its troops were fighting in France and not in Germany. France, England and Russia attempted to block an invader. In 1990, it's not because Kuwaitis disliked Saddam that it means Kuwait is responsible of Iraqi invasion.

My point is not to bash Germany. I'm just trying to find out the truth. Everyone hated everyone in 1914. Everyone was getting paranoid because of the wave of terror of that time. Actually, we can say somewhere that terrorism has already started a world war since nationalists, communists, anarchists were using Terror all over Europe at the beginning of the 20th century. As a result, it has provoked a very dangerous instability on the whole continent. :(
 
Originally posted by archer_007
The First World War was bound to happen. Only Wilhelm's ignorance lost the war for Germany. We could have a very different world today if not for Wilhelm.
A better world to you ? Why so ? Poland would be free ? :lol:
 
Yes. The repairations imposed on Germany caused economic collapse and made furtile ground for the rise of the Nazis.
 
Germany wanted help for the war and promised the Polish their own state. This was not only friendly by the Germans but also egoistic. They wanted to have a puffer between them and the Russians. This is policy.
I never said Versailles was the ONLY reason for Hitler but the MAIN one. True Germany had an inflation, but the inflation ended in 1923. Until the black thursday the economy boomed. With US help we could pay the reparations. And I concur this black thursday was not predictable. But the event of a crise was. Due to the reparations the German economy was doomed in that event. They were way too high. The US help stopped, Stresemann, the minister of foreign affairs and integrator of the right parties into the Republic died suddenly, the Weimar Coalation in the Reichstag broke and Hindenburg had to govern with emergency laws because of the negative majority by KPD and NSDAP. This lead to Hitler. These are the facts. And the main reason for that is Versailles: Too high reparations and other points which were unacceptable in the eyes of most Germans in that time.
Nationalists were also in that time a minority. Most of the Germans, who elected Hitler, did it because of protest. The Nationalists who coalated with him finally thought he could ba a puppet. They would have the power. How wrong they were. The leader of the DNVP, Hugenberg, said a day after Hitler became Reichskanzler he made the biggest error in his life electing him. These were internal German problems indeed, but enforced by the treaty.
So I stay and say Versailles was the main reason for Hitler, but of course not the only one. I also say Hitler could have been avoided even with Versailles, but so it was much more difficulty to prevent him.

Adler
 
not true when people say it didn't stop nationalism , cause it did. France, Britain and many other countries were pacifist and careless in the 20's... All countries ? Except one ! Germany ! Germany were stuck in an inflation making people poorer and poorer everyday.

Nationalism wasn't gone away after WW1. It still was strong in many European countries and it even grew stronger world-wide. Spain, Italy, Japan and India should be mentioning enough. And the apeasment policies of the British is hugely influenced by the fact, that it was definitley the British Empire, which was now the sickman of Europe. Heavily in debt to the Americans and the Empire in dissolvemt, stuck between a rock and a hard place. The Germans on the other hand, hadn't still seen their fair share of war, "storms of steel" was the bestseller there after the war, long before the inflation came.

Inflation is the main reason why Weimar Republic didn't last in Germany as the third Republic did in France. In 1929, the black thursday was the final hit to knock out completely the brand new Republic. Germany were economically dependant on the USA and it's been the main european country really touched by the crisis. Germans were already poorer because of the inflation, now they were completely stuck into poverty. As you can see, there hasn't been only Versailles. In 1910, Germany was the greatest European nation whereas it was a country without dignity anymore in 1930.

Weimar had many flaws in the beginning. Weimar isn't dubbed without reason the "republic without republicans". You forget that the democratic German parties still had the majority, but they were never able to work to together, as they where in a huge quarrel from the beginning on. The inflaiton just was the crisis that came for a republic, which would have a huge problem to surivive any crisis.


Hitler didn't hesitate to burn the Reichstag and to accuse the commies to get rid of them. Acting in such a way was very dangerous and if he did so, it's simply because it was the only way to beat the communists. Saying Versailles Treaty was an obvious call to wake up German Nationalism isn't totally true. It's Hitler who used it as a tool so that it would be the case.

It was necessary for Hitler to burn the Reichstag. In his whole career, he never won a sinlge election in Germany. And to grasp full power, the burning down of the Reichstag was the necessary step, making the communists scapegot was a very weclome bonus. Indeed, it is still not known, who exactly burned the Reichstag down, just Hitler could use it declare state-of-emergency and give himself absolute power. Who gained from it ? Hitler gained power, he had not before.

true, but this was a war that niether side had hoped for or expected...

I think that's true. They all expected to go home in autumn and be alive and welcomed as heros. WW1 how it was, was unprecedent and immaginable before. They thought it would be like the wars of the 19th century.
 
I think that's true. They all expected to go home in autumn and be alive and welcomed as heros. WW1 how it was, was unprecedent and immaginable before. They thought it would be like the wars of the 19th century.
I agree with you Yago... but once Germans understood they were stuck and it was impossible anymore to take Paris fast... let say in 1915 or 1916... why did they persist ? French and Brits couldn't declare cease fire as they were blocking an invader. If the war has been so long, it's because Germans wanted so. You won't bash French, Russians and even worse, Brits, simply because they wanted to protect their country ? At the opposite, at each minute of the war, Germany was free to say : "Okay, it's screwed up, we stop here right ?" but Germany didn't ! Why ?
My point wasn't to blindly defend France as Marla did. She's obviously a strong French patriot thinking her country could never be bad and that's plainly stupid.
Thanx Andrewz, you just proved me you were also plainly stupid since you're telling the exact same thing than me. ;)
 
It's funny cause in all those speeches about germans being the good guys during WW1, I just realize that, actually, France was wrong to block Germany during WW1 and France was wrong to not block them during WW2 !! :lol:

As a result :
- Brits and USA : always right during both World Wars.
- Germany : right during WW1 and wrong during WW2.
- France : always wrong during both World Wars. :lol:
 
Brits and USA : always right during both World Wars.

For the Brits, I have problems to follow your logic. As the end of France would have also meant the end of the UK. As for the Americans, I'm sure you know the line of thought, that the involvment of the Americans made the whole things more messy and dragged the war for another one and a half year on, as the Brits and French would have tried to settle for peace without the boost from the other side of the world ? This peace would have then looked different from the Versailles-treaty.
 
Originally posted by archer_007


I didnt say better, I just said different. Wilhelm was a foolish to let the treaties lapse that Bismarck put in place to keep France isolated.
If the treaties had lapsed, it's not because Wilhelm wanted so but simply because France paid in advance all the "reparations" (reparations for what by the way ?) it had to pay. Well anyway, I'm just a "blind defender of France" so I should stop to talk... ;)
 
Originally posted by EmpireofVirtue
A better world to you ? Why so ? Poland would be free ? :lol:

If you are laughing at the notion of a free Poland, then I am very offended. True, Poland was not the model country after WW1, but neither were any of the other countries except [maybe] Britain. Poland (or if not Poland, then the Polish people) suffered under the empires that partitioned it, and the people courageously actively fought for independence at least twice after the Third Partition and the fight was carried on by the patriotic writers, such as Adam Mickiewicz. The people were euphoric when they finally became an independent country, and very rightfully so, because they were unfree for 123 years. Who are you to ridicule that?
 
Originally posted by Kamilian1


If you are laughing at the notion of a free Poland, then I am very offended. True, Poland was not the model country after WW1, but neither were any of the other countries except [maybe] Britain. Poland (or if not Poland, then the Polish people) suffered under the empires that partitioned it, and the people courageously actively fought for independence at least twice after the Third Partition and the fight was carried on by the patriotic writers, such as Adam Mickiewicz. The people were euphoric when they finally became an independent country, and very rightfully so, because they were unfree for 123 years. Who are you to ridicule that?
Sorry if you take it badly... it's just I consider Poland is free today... that's all. Don't get all paranoid, I just mean that certainly the world would be different, but it doesn't mean it would be better. I know today's Europe map isn't perfect, however, it's still better than it used to be in the past that's all. Truely, I wasn't laughing at a free Poland. It's just because Adler17 explained very accurately that Germany wanted to free Poland in 1914 because it was strategically a "wall" between them and Russia. The thing is that, even if Germany failed, Poland had still been freed, and I think that's great. Please don't feel offended. I have so much problems to be understood in here that please please please don't add much to that. Thank you :)
 
Back
Top Bottom