Victim of perceived thug does end up in jail

Status
Not open for further replies.
No because you don't know how many problems they have or how fast they are solving them.

I don't know? They have accumulated 782 problems since August of 1961 and they are solving them at a rate of -2 per year. First world: 1 Non-first world: Zip.
 
Well, now I'm curious. Which country do you come from attackfighter?

Edit: Doesn't matter, seems you're from Canada. Thought you might be from Brazil or something the way you go on about the 1st world.
 
while the West descends further into degeneracy.

The % of the world market controlled by the west slipping does not mean that the west is descending to degeneracy. Do you think that in 50 years Western Europe and the US will be the third world? It's probably just that your anti-western sentiment has prevented you from thinking that far ahead.
 
jtb1127 said:
It's probably just that your anti-western sentiment has prevented you from thinking that far ahead.

Actually, it's his lack of a brain that's done that.
 
I've noticed that in all the threads on this topic, it's the same two or three people saying the same things over and over again.

I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.
 
Martin initiated the contact, he didn't like being followed and he let Zimmerman know it

and does anyone have proof Zimmerman continued "following" (he wasn't following him at that point, they were walking towards each other) Martin after the dispatcher told him to break it off? He said he turned around to head back the way he came from his truck and Martin came up behind him.



So according to your understanding of the law Martin was standing his ground when Zimmerman asked what he was doing there, but Zimmerman was not "standing his ground" when Martin knocked him down and bashed his head on the concrete?



How can Martin have initiated the contact when there would have been no contact at all without Zimmerman's actions of getting out of his car and pursuing Martin?
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

Do the needs of the many outweigh the rights of the few?
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

So basically you think that the many need blood, innocent or guilty, to slake their thirst for vengence?

And do you do you not think the West is falling into degeneracy?

And, are you a Christian, or a Jew, as you seem to advocate a blood sacrifice for remisson of sins, and in this case, as it may be innocent blood, the remisson of collective sin?
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

Thank you for providing something different.
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

This basically vindicates everything I've said. Subconsciously I think most of you grasshoppers know whats coming for you. You keep pretending to laugh at the ants as they go marching by with food stores, but there is a cold chill in the air and the leaves are falling from the trees. The long night will soon close on you. Goodbye little grasshoppers. Goodbye.
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

And you believe a race riot is going to happen because...?????
 
And you believe a race riot is going to happen because...?????

1992, maybe you've seen what happened in that year in L.A. (we had a few minor riots in my city as well, but I wasn't here at the time).
 
I'll say something different and controversial.

I think the jury should convict him even if there is no evidence against Zimmerman. As the saying goes, the needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few. They should convict him to avoid a race riot.

I was reading an argument about this just earlier - the sum of it was 'would you volunteer to take the blame, to assuage the race riot?' It's all too easy to justify taking away the rights of abstract other people, but thinking about them in relation to yourself brings a better perspective. The man deserves a fair trial, and if guilty, a fair punishment. That's his right as a citizen of a free country.
 
1992, maybe you've seen what happened in that year in L.A. (we had a few minor riots in my city as well, but I wasn't here at the time).

Except LA was already a powder keg waiting to go up and the Rodney King acquittals was the final straw after decades of LAPD racism, corruption and brutality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom