Victim of perceived thug does end up in jail

[attackfighter]

No, he means stormforce: http://www.stormforce1.com/

I see nothing notable about it.

As for stormfront... well the views expressed there don't conflict with liberal views, unless you warp the term liberal quite a bit. So it's not proof that Westerners aren't liberals.

 

[IdiotsOpposite]

No, he means stormforce: http://www.stormforce1.com/

I see nothing notable about it.

As for stormfront... well the views expressed there don't conflict with liberal views, unless you warp the term liberal quite a bit. So it's not proof that Westerners aren't liberals.

Do you know what the world liberal means in America?

Wait, wait, let me guess. What it means in America doesn't matter, because we're a bunch of first worlders. Right?

 

[Borachio]

Please. I mean Stormfront [sic]

I cannot see how you can stretch the meaning of liberal this far.

Moderator Action: Inappropriate content rules apply to this forum too, so inappropriate link removed.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[attackfighter]

I mean liberal in the most basic sense.

 

[Borachio]

What sense is that? I am intrigued.

 

[woody60707]

I assume I could skip the last few pages has nothing of importance was said.

 

[attackfighter]

Well actually you could skip every thread in this forum and still not miss anything important. This forum hasn't contributed anything of artistic, scientific or philosophical value to the world and the chance of it doing so in the future is infinitesimally small.

 

[Borachio]

I beg to differ.

 

[IdiotsOpposite]

Well actually you could skip every thread in this forum and still not miss anything important. This forum hasn't contributed anything of artistic, scientific or philosophical value to the world and the chance of it doing so in the future is infinitesimally small.

Which brings up the question of why you bother posting here if you believe that.

 

[attackfighter]

Which brings up the question of why you bother posting here if you believe that.

Well unlike others I don't posture and claim to be here for anything but my personal amusement.

 

[Crezth]

Well unlike others I don't posture and claim to be here for anything but my personal amusement.

What makes you think the rest of us aren't posting because your particular brand of failure is so amusing?

 

[Benefactor]

What makes you think the rest of us aren't posting because your particular brand of failure is so amusing?

Well, personally I'm here to make the world a better place.

 

[LucyDuke]

Question for Berzerker and others defending Zimmerman.

Is there anything that would convince you that he wasn't justified in killing Trayvon? Is there anything that would make you less certain that he was justified? If yes, what are those things? Would you accept a guilty verdict of murder two? A guilty verdict of a lesser crime?

Is there any way to format that so that 'Life on Mars' is in italics?

Manually.

[quote]Originally Posted by [b]DCI Gene Hunt in '[i]Life on Mars[/i]'[/b]
[i]A hate crime? As opposed to those 'really, really like you' crimes?[/i][/quote]

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt in 'Life on Mars'
A hate crime? As opposed to those 'really, really like you' crimes?

 

[Berzerker]

of course, if Zimmerman started the fight he's guilty of at least manslaughter... If Martin started the fight, Zimmerman is innocent...

 

[LucyDuke]

Are you going to accept the jury's decision, even if it's that Zimmerman was wholly at fault?

 

[attackfighter]

I will accept the jury's decision on the grounds that it's infallible. If you know anything at all, you will too.

 

[woody60707]

Are you going to accept the jury's decision, even if it's that Zimmerman was wholly at fault?

Well no one did for OJ or Casey.

 

[Berzerker]

Are you going to accept the jury's decision, even if it's that Zimmerman was wholly at fault?

Do I have a choice? Whether or not I agree with the jury's decision depends on the facts of the case, but I'm sure a jury will acquit. This is a simple case of self defense...

 

[Ayn Rand]

Well actually you could skip every thread in this forum and still not miss anything important. This forum hasn't contributed anything of artistic, scientific or philosophical value to the world and the chance of it doing so in the future is infinitesimally small.

Talk about telling it how it really is. How I miss that rare sound of an uncorrupted voice in the wilderness.

 

[Bugfatty300]

Some more Florida nonsense.

HB463 & SB998 - Shall Issue Carry Licenses for Military & Vets:

Those who defend our country overseas should be able to defend themselves and their families at home. There have been too many incidences of violence against our troops who have just returned from overseas deployments and found themselves defenseless at home. Florida Carry authored legislation that will insure that our current troops and honorably discharged veterans can obtain a license to carry regardless of age or duty station. The bill will also require that fingerprint cards be accepted from military police and provost so that service members stationed overseas can complete their applications.

There are over 8,000 adult service members under the age of 21 living in the State of Florida. Countless more resident veterans and annual military visitors who will have their right the bear arms advanced by these bills.

http://www.floridacarry.org/legislation/25-2012-session/41-2012

They'll still go to jail for having a sip of beer though.