• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days (this includes any time you see the message "account suspended"). For more updates please see here.

Warren Buffett Gives Away His Fortune

Civrules

We the People
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
5,621
Location
US
Quite a generous man! :)

CNN said:
FORTUNE EXCLUSIVE: The world's second richest man - who's now worth $44 billion - tells editor-at-large Carol Loomis he will start giving away 85% of his wealth in July - most of it to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

NEW YORK (FORTUNE Magazine) - We were sitting in a Manhattan living room on a spring afternoon, and Warren Buffett had a Cherry Coke in his hand as usual. But this unremarkable scene was about to take a surprising turn.

"Brace yourself," Buffett warned with a grin. He then described a momentous change in his thinking. Within months, he said, he would begin to give away his Berkshire Hathaway fortune, then and now worth well over $40 billion.

This news was indeed stunning. Buffett, 75, has for decades said his wealth would go to philanthropy but has just as steadily indicated the handoff would be made at his death. Now he was revising the timetable.

"I know what I want to do," he said, "and it makes sense to get going." On that spring day his plan was uncertain in some of its details; today it is essentially complete. And it is typical Buffett: rational, original, breaking the mold of how extremely rich people donate money.

Buffett has pledged to gradually give 85% of his Berkshire stock to five foundations. A dominant five-sixths of the shares will go to the world's largest philanthropic organization, the $30 billion Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, whose principals are close friends of Buffett's (a connection that began in 1991, when a mutual friend introduced Buffett and Bill Gates).

The Gateses credit Buffett, says Bill, with having "inspired" their thinking about giving money back to society. Their foundation's activities, internationally famous, are focused on world health -- fighting such diseases as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis -- and on improving U.S. libraries and high schools.

Up to now, the two Gateses have been the only trustees of their foundation. But as his plan gets underway, Buffett will be joining them. Bill Gates says he and his wife are "thrilled" by that and by knowing that Buffett's money will allow the foundation to "both deepen and accelerate" its work. "The generosity and trust Warren has shown," Gates adds, "is incredible." Beginning in July and continuing every year, Buffett will give a set, annually declining number of Berkshire B shares - starting with 602,500 in 2006 and then decreasing by 5% per year - to the five foundations. The gifts to the Gates foundation will be made either by Buffett or through his estate as long as at least one of the pair -- Bill, now 50, or Melinda, 41 -- is active in it.

Berkshire's price on the date of each gift will determine its dollar value. Were B shares, for example, to be $3,071 in July - that was their close on June 23 - Buffett's 2006 gift to the foundation, 500,000 shares, would be worth about $1.5 billion. With so much new money to handle, the foundation will be given two years to resize its operations. But it will then be required by the terms of Buffett's gift to annually spend the dollar amount of his contributions as well as those it is already making from its existing assets. At the moment, $1.5 billion would roughly double the foundation's yearly benefactions. But the $1.5 billion has little relevance to the value of Buffett's future gifts, since their amount will depend on the price of Berkshire's stock when they are made. If the stock rises yearly, on average, by even a modest amount - say, 6% - the gain will more than offset the annual 5% decline in the number of shares given. Under those circumstances, the value of Buffett's contributions will rise.

Buffett himself thinks that will happen. Or to state that proposition more directly: He believes the price of Berkshire, and with it the dollar size of the contributions, will trend upward - perhaps over time increasing substantially. The other foundation gifts that Buffett is making will also occur annually and start in July. At Berkshire's current price, the combined 2006 total of these gifts will be $315 million. The contributions will go to foundations headed by Buffett's three children, Susan, Howard, and Peter, and to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation.

This last foundation was for 40 years known simply as the Buffett Foundation and was recently renamed in honor of Buffett's late wife, Susie, who died in 2004, at 72, after a stroke. Her will bestows about $2.5 billion on the foundation, to which her husband's gifts will be added. The foundation has mainly focused on reproductive health, family planning, and pro-choice causes, and on preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. Counting the gifts to all five foundations, Buffett will gradually but sharply reduce his holdings of Berkshire (Charts) stock. He now owns close to 31% of the company-worth nearly $44 billion in late June - and that proportion will ultimately be cut to around 5%. Sticking to his long-term intentions, Buffett says the residual 5%, worth about $6.8 billion today, will in time go for philanthropy also, perhaps in his lifetime and, if not, at his death.

Because the value of Buffett's gifts are tied to a future, unknowable price of Berkshire, there is no way to put a total dollar value on them. But the number of shares earmarked to be given have a huge value today: $37 billion.

That alone would be the largest philanthropic gift in history. And if Buffett is right in thinking that Berkshire's price will trend upward, the eventual amount given could far exceed that figure.

So that's the plan. What follows is a conversation in which Buffett explains how he moved away from his original thinking and decided to begin giving now. The questioner is yours truly, FORTUNE editor-at-large Carol Loomis. I am a longtime friend of Buffett's, a Berkshire Hathaway shareholder, and a director of the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation.

It's amazing to see individual people being so generous... when not even the government can wants to spend so much money to help others!

http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/25/magazines/fortune/charity1.fortune/index.htm?cnn=yes

That amount of money can do wonders in terms of helping people in need.
 
How long before he's called a damn socialist? ;)

From what I read about the man and from the feedback I got from people who went to his annual fiesta, Warren Buffet is out of this world (for a businessman of course)! I hope his words and actions will influence many.
 
I may hate Microsofts software for all the grief it's put me through, but I've never had any reason to chastise Bill's philanthropy, that this guy has joined him is edifying, I hope more will follow this excellent example of what charity really means, the love of your fellow man :) restores some of the lost faith in humanity.

What worth is 40 billion to you when your dead, once your familly is well provided for the excess is just a waste IMO. Always have as much as you need, and if you have more try and give a little back, in this country the working class give more to charity than the more wealthy middle class, money seems to have a way of corrupting some people, it's the middle classes you really want to get motivated, that's where alot of the money is, in the millions of semi rich, rather than the few super rich.
 
I think I probably would have given to different organizations, but still that's very impressive that he's giving away so much money. Good job Buffett!

But really, who seriously needs $40+ billion dollars? That much money is mind-boggling for a personal fortune; you could sleep on a mattress filled with thousand dollar bills and never miss the money.
 
He's 75 years old! He could die any day now. How is it philantrophy when he's not going to enjoy his wealth much longer? Good for him that he can be so generous, but he really could have done it sooner.
 
puglover said:
He's 75 years old! He could die any day now. How is it philantrophy when he's not going to enjoy his wealth much longer? Good for him that he can be so generous, but he really could have done it sooner.

What? :crazyeye:
Philanthropy - 1. The effort or inclination to increase the well-being of humankind, as by charitable aid or donations.
2. Love of humankind in general.
3. Something, such as an activity or institution, intended to promote human welfare.

How is it not philanthropy?
 
Civrules said:
How is it not philanthropy?

It would certainly be more generous if he was giving something away that he wouldn't be losing in a few years anyway. :p

But I'm just a snob and a party-pooper.
 
I don't think it helps anybody to throw money at problems. I'd expect men like Buffet to know such things.
 
rmsharpe said:
I don't think it helps anybody to throw money at problems. I'd expect men like Buffet to know such things.

So what do you expect for him to do?

Is there a better way (other than money) to help African people survive diseases that are very easily prevented with the right equipment in hospitals?
(This is just one example.)

I don't understand how even out of such a positive situation where one donates billions people still manage to find negativities.
 
You know the way CivRules. Just tell them that they live in a free market and that they have the same opportunities as anyone else to do something good with their lifes. Then wait. They don't call it Laissez-Faire because people get involved.
 
Civrules said:
So what do you expect for him to do?

Is there a better way (other than money) to help African people survive diseases that are very easily prevented with the right equipment in hospitals?
(This is just one example.)[/QUOTE]
I don't see how creating a dependency cycle solves a problem.

For example, the Western world has given Nigeria over $400 billion in the last 40 years, that's three times the amount of money (inflation-adjusted) we spent to help Western Europe after World War II.

At one time, Tanzania received more aid per capita than any other country, yet Tanzania is the second poorest country on earth.

Show me where aid has done good things in the third world. You'll be hard pressed to find any positive outcomes.
 
rmsharpe said:
I don't see how creating a dependency cycle solves a problem.

For example, the Western world has given Nigeria over $400 billion in the last 40 years, that's three times the amount of money (inflation-adjusted) we spent to help Western Europe after World War II.

At one time, Tanzania received more aid per capita than any other country, yet Tanzania is the second poorest country on earth.

Show me where aid has done good things in the third world. You'll be hard pressed to find any positive outcomes.

I'll show you. But you have not yet answered my question of what you suggest to improve the situation.

Does the Marshall Plan ring any bells at all? Europe was crippled at the time... and with that money, yes, things dramatically improved.

I think you are confusing something. Sure just throwing money doesn't solve the problem. Throwing money AND having a good plan does.
 
De Lorimier said:
How long before he's called a damn socialist? ;)

From what I read about the man and from the feedback I got from people who went to his annual fiesta, Warren Buffet is out of this world (for a businessman of course)! I hope his words and actions will influence many.

No, if he was a socialist, he'd be giving away other people's money. ;)
 
If you noticed, I said show me aid to the third world that's done any good. The Marshall Plan merely sped up the process at which Europe would industrialize; it wasn't as if with all of their knowledge and development was going to go down the toilet simply because they were bankrupted by the war.
 
rmsharpe said:
If you noticed, I said show me aid to the third world that's done any good. The Marshall Plan merely sped up the process at which Europe would industrialize; it wasn't as if with all of their knowledge and development was going to go down the toilet simply because they were bankrupted by the war.

Well, speeding up the (re)industrialization process counts as doing good, right?
 
rmsharpe said:
If you noticed, I said show me aid to the third world that's done any good. The Marshall Plan merely sped up the process at which Europe would industrialize; it wasn't as if with all of their knowledge and development was going to go down the toilet simply because they were bankrupted by the war.

sheez, that's incredibly ignorant, I aint even gonna bother providing links, why would you read them you know so much about charity already.

Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, give him a net and teach him how to use it and he'll feed himself for life, do you have any real conception of how charities work these days? Or are you thinking of the bad old days where throw money at the situation and hope it works was the main idea?:rolleyes:
 
IglooDude said:
Well, speeding up the (re)industrialization process counts as doing good, right?
Yes, but the fact remains that we are still talking about traditionally rich countries compared to today's African nations. These countries were going to recover, one way or the other. The poorest Western European country, Portugal, is still nearly twice as wealthy as the richest country in black Africa, Botswana. (Excluding South Africa, but even then, Portugal still stands far ahead.)

Sidhe said:
sheez, that's incredibly ignorant, I aint even gonna bother providing links, why would you read them you know so much about charity already.
Sounds more like a lame excuse as to not provide any facts.
 
Buffett's made his money by being an extremely smart investor; I have no doubt he picked the smartest possible charity to give it to. It's become rather obvious that giving money to corrupt governments doesn't work, which is why the Gates foundation gives out money for scholarships, vaccines, vaccines researdh, and research for antidotes to diseases that are all but dead in the West but affect millions in the Third World such as polio instead.
 
rmsharpe said:
Sounds more like a lame excuse as to not provide any facts.

It sounds to me like a smart choice on his part not to steer this thread off-topic like so many other threads go. And don’t provoke anything by saying what you just said either. Feel free to create another thread for that if you want.

jameson said:
Buffett's made his money by being an extremely smart investor; I have no doubt he picked the smartest possible charity to give it to. It's become rather obvious that giving money to corrupt governments doesn't work, which is why the Gates foundation gives out money for scholarships, vaccines, vaccines researdh, and research for antidotes to diseases that are all but dead in the West but affect millions in the Third World such as polio instead.

I agree that that is a problem. There are a lot of areas where money could be used for research though... But the money could also be used to ensure a more stable transaction of more money which could help more efficiently without corruption. It's difficult though.
 
Back
Top Bottom