I'm a student, but my family is probably upper middle class.
Would you care to expand on the non-monetary aspects of what constitutes a working class identity please? I've got a good idea, but I'd be interested to hear what you've got on the matter.Working class 'til I die.
Would you care to expand on the non-monetary aspects of what constitutes a working class identity please? I've got a good idea, but I'd be interested to hear what you've got on the matter.
Education, outlook, upbringing (I think personally thats the most important, if you grow up as a miners son or factory workers daughter your working class outlook will unlikely change even if you become financially middle class
Oh, don't tell that to Barry Lyndon or Becky Sharp!
Would you agree with my assessment that income isn't as big a factor as whether you get your hands dirty as part of the job in determining class?
With regards to income and future prospects, I'm upper-middle class moving to upper class.
With regards to lifestyle, I'm upper-lower class.
My career is currently in the process of shifting from into more hands-on work.
I'm still wondering how the middle and upper class have all this money if they don't work. Can someone help me out?
Outlook being the interesting one there. There is quite a bit going on with that. In my humble experience "a working class outlook" concerns itself with power relations more than anything else. To simplify it for brevity, those power relations are best seen at work on the picket line. To be truly working class and be a manager, for example, is an uneasy existence.Education, outlook, upbringing (I think personally thats the most important, if you grow up as a miners son or factory workers daughter your working class outlook will unlikely change even if you become financially middle class, ditto middle class people who have lower paying jobs than their folks), sad to say but accent in Ireland is a big determinant (Is that a word) of how people percieve your class. Job you work in to an extent too, you have plenty of electricians, plumbers, builders etc who make a bomb, but very very few would be middle class.
that sounds pretty ominous, like youre about to get made or something
Historically, the upper classes were the nobility who never did a day of work in their lives. The working classes were labourers and the like. The middle classes were rich, and may have worked, but certainly wouldn't have been getting their hands dirty.
To understand the original, and in Europe to a large extent, the current meaning of the classes, you have to abandon the American notion that your class is determined purely by income.
First, Upper class = noble elite, working class = everyone else. Then the social order got thrown into confusion with the industrial revolution, and the middle classes were born. The three exist today mostly as a cultural distinction born out of a history that the US never had and never understood. You're much better off without it in any case.
I'm pretty sure nobody posting here is upper class. Not unless we're totally abandoning the meaning of the word. It has nothing to do with money.
Typical limousine liberal.
Spoiler :j/k![]()
Outlook being the interesting one there. There is quite a bit going on with that. In my humble experience "a working class outlook" concerns itself with power relations more than anything else. To simplify it for brevity, those power relations are best seen at work on the picket line. To be truly working class and be a manager, for example, is an uneasy existence.
Of course, the nature of employment and power structures in society have changed somewhat recently (but not all that much really imo). Today, for example, one can be one's own manager, running one's own business. But to manage others, to order them around, to take a mark up on their service and to have your survival better served on the other side of the picket line from the workers, is not quite in accordance with "a working class outlook".
And I reckon position on the picket line is illustrative of the other class values here too. The middle class are typically cosy, pragmatic and self serving. They'll side whichever way suits them best, regardless of partisan loyalty. The upper classes, who will hardly ever find themselves amongst the labour force, will of course side with the bottom line, which best serves them. This is partly coincidental to their ideology and programmed outlook, and partly rooted in their interests.