I'm originally a so called "console gamer" and only used PC to play civ. Right now on my PS3 I have CoD: WaW, CoD: mw2 and Bad Company 2. While it might look like I'm a fps freak I'm not really. It's just that I don't like "expendable" or "play trough once and no much of use afterwards" kinda games, so I tend to either avoid them or sell them if I happened to buy it hoping for a good lasting gameplay

.
As I'm very much disappointed in console game industry right now (mostly because they fail to provide a good quality lasting replayable gameplay), I abandoned console for now.
On my PC, besides the obvious BtS, I have civ3 complete which I accidentally bought on steam, Alien swarm, Anno 4 (very annoying game), Crysis Warhead (borrowed from my friend just to try out my new video card, couldn't care less otherwise) and Modern warfare 2 which I got for free with the new video card (video card not free

) as part of the deal.
So I, a





console gamer finally got to play fps multiplayer (mw2, which own on ps3, stopped playing that crap 3 months ago or so) with the "real" pros on PC

. After all the crap I heard from buddies and people who play PC, especially this one "hardcore PC fan defender of the faith" guy about how console fps players are crap (like anyone cares

), how PC gamers are better and how a common PC player will rape my arse

. While I never denied it, the logic behind this is astonishing

(considering that it's exactly the same what happens to dedicated PC gamers who try a console match, as in they get raped).
So I tried that crap game and surprise surprise, after a couple of games adapting, it's the same game as before

didn't do any worse or better than on a console, actually even raped people in a couple of games via bringing some tactics from console matches, which PC players weren't used to it seems

.
But I got a little off topic I think, no one cares about my rants anyway.
