#1 Person
The Cow
I like civ 2 in a similar way I like public television, it isn't flashy, with funny sound effects and graphics. It is just simple and clean and easy.
What I don't like in CivII is these inpenetrable City Walls (A Phalanx behind the walls defeats a Rifleman!)
There are so many ways to answer this question. "It sucks" might be a good one.What ISN'T so good about Civ II?
Yes, you do.I think it's better than Civ III and IV,
If you haven't upgraded your computer over the last ten years...it's much faster,
You obviously haven't played Civ4 at all, have you?no time wasted with shiny graphics
Just turn "Quick moves" on!!! Jesus!and having to watch your little men walking.
"Ridiculous"? "Irritating" would be a better word.It is fun because it can get so ridiculous (see the list of A.I stupidities)
Because the developers gave you massive handicaps.yet is always challenging.
[/QUOTE]Now stand still whilst I burn "I love Civ II" to your forehead
Hi there,
ISo I would like to know what concepts of CivII you miss in Civ III/IV.
What about the zone of control, for example?
Or the new city maintenance concept in CivIV?
There are so many ways to answer this question. "It sucks" might be a good one.
I don't see how that's relevant to the discussion. He's stating his opinion, which he is entitled to, and you seem to think this makes him childish. You asked people why they like Civ2; don't chastize them for it.Swedishguy said:Just one question: How old are you?
No, I think he's old. Just old people are technophobic.I don't see how that's relevant to the discussion. He's stating his opinion, which he is entitled to, and you seem to think this makes him childish. You asked people why they like Civ2; don't chastize them for it.