Also, I'm back! How's everyone doing?
It's been a bit quiet since you were gone.
), I wrote a paper on Allied propaganda in World War 2, and I got to briefly reference Wilhelmina and Radio Oranje. If anyone is curious, she also broadcast in English. I know some of the Dutch-speaking posters mentioned that her in-game accent is wrong, but I have to say her Civ6 VA really captured her vocal mannerisms.
... who was't a good leader to start with. Fraxis should've kept Sejong the great!
We all know that's your pet rant, but a lot of people disagree with you.
look at this Korean list of "명군" (Korean for wise ruler) and Seondok isn't here..https://namu.wiki/w/명군/아시아#s-1. in fact she is listed under 암군 (foolish and poor ruler)
English regard John as poor and foolish and Richard as wonderful when it's actually the other way around so...popular opinion is hardly a useful metric of a leader's effectiveness. Many historians have revised their opinion of her.
both of them were poor ruler... at least Richard was a great solider if a poor king. John had neither.
I mean the most interesting doesn't always mean the best ruler of the civilization. Kristina definitely comes to mind, but I like her leading Sweden.
Which is probably a reason why we got their mother Eleanor, because they obviously couldn't decide on which brother.
they should've used king Muyeol of Silla. He was one who almost united Korean peninsula in fact he defeated ancient kingdom of baekje and almost defeated Goguryeo. ( granted it was his son Munmu who finalized the conquest) They should've used him as a representation of Korea if they wanted leaders from Sillia.
Modern historical consensus is that John was an effective administrator with a lot of personality flaws that were exaggerated by succeeding chroniclers. In particular, the excessive taxation he was notorious for was the fault of his brother's irresponsible crusading. Much like Cleopatra, John was dealt a bad hand that no amount of skill could have rectified (though he had considerable less skill at making the best of a bad hand than Cleopatra did). As for Richard, the man spent only a few months of his reign in his own realm; that de facto makes him a bad king who is only fondly remembered for his crusade stories.
A bit off topic since he is not in civ6, but Enrico Dandolo lol. Leading an army in person when you're almost 90 years old and blind as a bat is apparently very cool to me. I always imagine a Hollywood film about the fourth crusade where Ian McKellen plays DandoloSo, here's a question I'll pose to you: Who is the most interesting Leader in Civ 6? Not the best Leader, not the worst Leader, but the one who made you think, "Hmm... I wonder who this guy was in real life and what he did."
Also, I'm back! How's everyone doing?
With a name like that you don't even need to say words to know which leader is your favoriteA bit off topic since he is not in civ6, but Enrico Dandolo lol. Leading an army in person when you're almost 90 years old and blind as a bat is apparently very cool to me. I always imagine a Hollywood film about the fourth crusade where Ian McKellen plays Dandolo
Darius approves.
It might explain why his laugh makes me want to straight up murder him.
