quick question for everybody. Are people more interested in a
(NOT for a NES)
476 A.D. Scenario: Rome has fallen but their is a small segment loyal to West Rome in Illyria. To Odaocer Kingdoms and Vandals: Consolidate your Kingdom, West Rome: Stay Alive, East Rome Conquer, everyone else KILLY Killy!
500 A.D. : The one I like the most. West Rome is done, but the Byzantine Star is rising. Barbarians, your time is running out. Settle or die!
650 A.D.: The onset of the Middle Ages.
[wiki]Scramble for Africa[/wiki]. Not once do any of the following words appear: Pope, Papacy, Papal, bull, Vatican, Rome, and holy.
Wikipedia is truth.
If anybody else would like to give an insight on the dividing up of Africa being led by Papal right, please do so or forever hold your peace.
...or that isn't as a result of bias?Why not trust it, can someone show my a grave error on wikipedia right now (that isnt a recent result of vandalism)?
Who would play in a quick and easy zombie apocalypse NES? The premise being there is a city map, you pick a start location, you pick your limited choice of starting stuff and the last player living wins. Turns go by 1 day, in which your character needs 1 unit of water or something and so on. Pretty much meaning you have to move around and expose yourself. Could be a fun quickie.
I'd probably play in that. I'd like to try playing in one of these games where you control an individual, not a nation.
I'll reserve one. Nations are troublesome, but I've played plenty First person zombie games.
I have a rough draft of the rules made. Still need to make the map. I will only have spots for 5 players this first time. If you want a reserve you can. Captain2 already has one.
Ok. BTW: How do you make screen shots?