AffineConstant
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2022
- Messages
- 227
The title seems self explanatory.
The large scale disappointment in the "Civ switching" mechanic seems entirely based around, well, switching Civs twice in a game (after choosing one to begin with). Playing as Egypt then Songhai, or Britain to Japan? But choosing a new Civ bonus, one appropriate to each of three ages, seems to be entirely separable from switching what leader you have, or what your Civ is called.
In another version of Civ VII you choose your leader with a unique bonus and defined building set the entire game, then each age you choose which bonus to get for that age. The bonus for each age requiring you to change Civs and Leaders seem entirely arbitrary, why are they connected?
The large scale disappointment in the "Civ switching" mechanic seems entirely based around, well, switching Civs twice in a game (after choosing one to begin with). Playing as Egypt then Songhai, or Britain to Japan? But choosing a new Civ bonus, one appropriate to each of three ages, seems to be entirely separable from switching what leader you have, or what your Civ is called.
In another version of Civ VII you choose your leader with a unique bonus and defined building set the entire game, then each age you choose which bonus to get for that age. The bonus for each age requiring you to change Civs and Leaders seem entirely arbitrary, why are they connected?