Why have incels gotten so much attention?

Why would it be the primary group identifier? Other than when they're talked about as such? Just out of curiosity more than anything.

They do in fact form as organised groups online and IRL, with membership resting on self defining as an incel and having beliefs which conform to those of the group. There's even a grading system in play I don't care to learn about involving having taken different coloured "pills".

I'd say that's pretty much definitively a case of self identity really.
 
Such friendly robots and dolls are a work in progress by existing companies. Google is your friend. I'd bet they are working the Alexa technology into them as we speak type, but it will be touch sensitive rather than voice activated.

I mean I don't really care about this, I don't have much trouble getting laid despite being basically a pit of despair, hence my relative lack of sympathy for incels.

(oh yes yes, I know some men here are very progressive, and I love you for that, but you've got to admit overall there are problems)

Speaking for myself, I consider myself pretty "enlightened" when it comes to relations with women, and I'm discovering problems with how I think about/relate to women like every other week so yeah, "overall there are problems."
 
Near as I can tell, low sociability males not in domestic relationships are a group not disposed to average, much less above average, rates of violence. Despite some flashy horrific low occurrence events. So if we're doing a 'primary motivator' thing it's the people looking at them I'd be more inclined to suspect of antisocial actualized violence. On the whole.

Unless there are like four of these buggers out there to explain the numbers.
 
That's a pretty disingenuous stretch from the context of what you're quoting.

When it comes to choosing partners at the individual level people freely discriminate on quite a few things that would be straight up illegal in the work place, including gender. It's probably a good thing that nobody is going miss out on money to live or due process if they don't date me.

ITT having preference is discrimination

Poor, Poor Civ 5 (even if it's not sexual.... probably)

Funny enough I've read about this alleged "discrimination" against incels, such as X-cel where X is something arbitrary, like neckcel, where apparently because of their neck, it means they can't get laid and other stuff like wristcel, armcel, noobcel, Procel, Aggcel, PlainsCowCel, APMcel.....
 
Last edited:
I mean I don't really care about this, I don't have much trouble getting laid despite being basically a pit of despair, hence my relative lack of sympathy for incels.
You're tall, also some chicks like that despairy s***
 
Speak for yourself lol. For me it is entirely the other way around, I have always been able to talk about sex with my parents and friends (and other adults, really) and I think this is a much better introduction than "blonde slut is pummeled into submission part 4". It's nice that you understood porn as kind of a fantasy, however you always project your own conclusions onto others. I definitely think that many youngers don't think of porn as an alternate reality. Porn sites don't have disclaimers about porn being far from reality, they don't warn you that literally every other title has a slur word for women (slut, hoe, *****, though these are the least bad ones tbh..) and even if they did, no one would read that ****.

I'm not Christian nor am I trying to stop anyone from watching porn, I'm just raising concern.
I think a lot of what you said and quoted reinforces my feelings, how harmful pornography is for men's depictions of women. Like in your scenarios, those men aren't interacting with real women, and have no relationships with them outside of sex, so I'd imagine if you do that long enough you'll start believing (even if subconsciously) how women (and beautiful, perfect women at that) will just show up and be ready for you to have sex with, with no minds or souls, just bodies and not real people at all, you know what I mean? And since that's not reality, I understand how frustrating it can be for those young men, but I believe blame is on male creation of fantasy, not women, right?
Like I said before, I don't think pornography per se is harmful. It has existed at all times in human history: I remember in some European museum I saw a book of pornography, which showed people having sex in those gigantic baroque wigs and crinoline skirts.

It seems that the problem you have with pornography is not pornography itself—the depiction of sexual intercourse—but the reflection of patriarchy and sexism within it. However, pornography is not the only medium through which patriarchy is disseminated: if you play video games, you are flooded with objectified and almost fully naked women; if you watch movies, you will see women in secondary roles and usually as the male lead's love interest. Are you concerned that someone playing video games or watching TV is going to have unrealistic expectations relationships with women? Because video games and movies are easily available to everyone regardless of age (generally) and can often be discussed publicly, unlike porn. If you want to talk about the objectification of women in our society, then it's unfair to single out pornography as the only medium.

Speak for yourself lol.
I am speaking for the average American, which you aren't is my guess? I can tell you that American-made porn has got to be the most violent, performative, roughest material that's out there. And that's because it reflects our culture, where bodies have to be perfect, looks have to be perfect, acts have to be perfect. American porn also reflects some racial issues, like black men with big penises "raping" white women (historically, black men were often lynched when suspected of even looking at white women, for example, and the myth of the "black rapist" seems to have persisted and taken a different shape). And if you watch American movies, most of them consist of fighting, blowing things up, racing in cars, and killing people—because it reflects our national mythology and social fantasies.

The point I am making is that pornography does not exist in some kind of vacuum, but within temporal social contexts. Your concerns are only symptoms of a much larger problem in our society, and that problem is going to persist for a long time because we, as Americans, like to pretend like everything is fine. It's also quite paradoxical that despite the objectification and sexualization of human bodies in the media, our society is rather puritanical (which you can even see from moderator warnings in this friend, citing the old Republican adage of "family values"). We see gore, blood, and violence openly in film, but showing some nudity is considered taboo. And ironically, because sex and sexuality are taboo to discuss, people can only learn about them from something like pornographic materials. It's almost as if American porn is the product of sexual frustration and repression, which, I guess, is what forces incels and other sexually frustrated men to do terrible things?

Thanks for attending my TED talk.
 
Honestly, doubt this very much.


Lets try that the other way:

The most violent, performative, roughest material that's out there is American made.

Do you doubt that? I'm thinking that could very well be true. With most media products, I think the widest range and most extremes are US made.

I think the way it was first stated gives a different impression since it seems to be about the entire range of US made material rather than a statement on the origin of the most extreme material.
 
I mean there's like literal filmed rapes and stuff in places like Vietnam and Thailand, and I really doubt that American porn is more violent/misogynistic than, for example, Russian porn. Anecdotally most of the craziest stuff I've seen seems to be Japanese as well.
 
The most violent, performative, roughest material that's out there is American made.

Do you doubt that? I'm thinking that could very well be true.
I very much doubt it. The moment you enter the porn underground and look for some real sick fetishes, half of the videos you'll find have Russian titles and descriptions, and the comments are filled with people writing Russian as well.

America certainly has a fetish for living out their racial tensions in sexual fantasies, but that's about it.
 
I am sure there is crazy stuff everywhere, but I am talking about things on average. To be fair, it's a bit hard to even make comparisons because the US has a monopoly on movie an TV production in the world. I guess, you could look at Bollywood films... where everyone sings and dances. Meanwhile, in most popular US shows—like Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, American Horror Story, or Game of Thrones—someone gets violently murdered every episode. I am so desensitized to it that I cease to notice.

And isn't Game of Thrones considered "adult" because of boobs and not because of mass murders and violence? Yeah.
 
I'm just talking about porn, not popular culture in general.
 
I am sure there is crazy stuff everywhere, but I am talking about things on average. To be fair, it's a bit hard to even make comparisons because the US has a monopoly on movie an TV production in the world. I guess, you could look at Bollywood films... where everyone sings and dances. Meanwhile, in most popular US shows—like Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, American Horror Story, or Game of Thrones—someone gets violently murdered every episode. I am so desensitized to it that I cease to notice.
I don't know, American violence is... just there. It's almost background noise, I do not find it particularly crass.

If you watch the right anime on the other hand, you'll find that extreme violence is often used intentionally to make your stomach turn. People screaming for help while their bodies are ripped apart graphically, especially when this happens to characters that are depicted as helpless and innocent.

THAT is actual fetishization of violence in a way unlike anything I've ever seen in the US. And while actual high-budget anime of that type are rare, you can still find thousands of commercially produced manga that depict gore in a way that you'll simply not find in American productions.
 
I'm just talking about porn, not popular culture in general.
And I am saying there is no difference, really. Even taking Japan as an example, Japanese films ("Battle Royale", anyone?) and anime are pretty violent, too.
 
*shrug* none of us is basing this argument on anything substantial so...I don't see what's to be gained by continuing.
 
After many years of "research", I am still not sure which country produces the worst porn, but I don't think I want to know.

But yes, I must agree with the idea that portrayal of sex in media as a whole is both narrow and inflexible, as well as there being a degree of violence. Or at least treating women as disposable for the sake of the male pleasure endgame though I would like to think things are changing It seems somewhat wrong for people to look down on porn stars while admiring them at night behind closed doors. In any case, you have quite a few porn stars dying-- 4 died the past year and a few were quite related to depression and such.

I'm not writing an anti-porn thing, nor am I trying to guilt trip anyone for watching porn as that would just be hypocritical; not like this would stop anyone; but trying to put it out there that all is not right, and the very least things could change for the better. Those are actual people out there putting all of it out (literally) for your sake, so it's just good to keep that in mind. Because empathy is important. Without it, well, you get crap like incels.

So I may not agree totally with adcarrymaokai but there are some things to think about
 
138 pages!

Don't be fooled. Most are probably duplicates.
 
Back
Top Bottom