Why Islam is a problem for the integration of immigrants

We cannot rewrite the past. We can only respond to the present. But if the neighboring countries are our allies, then we have a duty to offset their risk. And a lot more civilians will die with your plan than with mine.

Your "plan"?! The left's "plan" is to do nothing and maintain the status quo.

The status quo has lead to the deaths of millions, with millions displaced across the Middle East and North Africa with no end in sight to the millions of people fleeing into Europe. Syria is a failing state, Libya is now a failed terrorist state and terrorist attacks have become commonplace in Europe. Liberals have demonstrated nothing short of their absolute incompetence for managing both foreign and domestic affairs.

Your so-called "plan" has been nothing but an utter failure of death, violence, chaos, and destruction. It also fails to provide any solution to the crisis.
 
Last edited:
Your "plan"?! The left's "plan" is to do nothing and maintain the status quo.

The status quo has lead to the deaths of millions, with millions displaced across the Middle East and North Africa with no end in sight to the millions of people fleeing into Europe. Syria is a failing state, Libya is now a failed terrorist state and terrorist attacks have become commonplace in Europe. Liberals have demonstrated nothing short of their absolute incompetence for managing both foreign and domestic affairs.

Your so-called "plan" has been nothing but an utter failure of death, violence, chaos, and destruction.

Wait...so you are saying that GWBush was a leftist? I mean, I'll admit that he was probably far to the left of YOU, but heck, when you are a right wing extremist who isn't to the left of you?
 
Wait...so you are saying that GWBush was a leftist? I mean, I'll admit that he was probably far to the left of YOU, but heck, when you are a right wing extremist who isn't to the left of you?

Last I checked GB didn't destroy Libya and allow millions of people to flood into Europe with no end in sight and no solutions. Liberals did that.
 
Last I checked GB didn't destroy Libya and allow millions of people to flood into Europe. Liberals did that.

LOL...so among right wing extremists everything was just peachy in the middle east after GWBush destabilized the place by bringing down Saddam with no clear plan about how to maintain order. Good to know.
 
LOL...so among right wing extremists everything was just peachy in the middle east after GWBush destabilized the place by bringing down Saddam with no clear plan about how to maintain order. Good to know.

When GB left office Iraq was stable and under control. Terrorist attacks in Western Countries were not commonplace, there was no civil war in Syria, Libya wasn't a failed terrorist state and millions of people weren't flooding into Europe with no end in sight.

I'm not here to defend GB, but in comparison to what's going on now GB did a far better job, which speaks volumes to how utterly incompetent the left is.
 
When GB left office Iraq was stable and under control.

Stable? There was a civil war on that could only be contained by having American troops on the ground so that ALL the factions could be united by hating the invaders. Your ability to reimagine history is impressive, but I suppose doing "research" be following right wing extremist link lists will do that for you.
 
Stable? There was a civil war on that could only be contained by having American troops on the ground so that ALL the factions could be united by hating the invaders.

Yes, Iraq was occupied and under control. That would be the purpose of occupation to put down all resistance.
 
Um, Gaddafi did bomb his own country before NATO did their bombing, his ambassador to the UN literally begged for foreign intervention to overthrow him.
 
Now the right wing extremist view has been edited in. I wish you had included that call for genocide before I answered the first time. "Stability through genocide" is not a motto that will gain much respect in any circles other than your obvious usual haunts.
 
In this case it did. America has control of the country.

The region was certainly better of then than it it now.

I don't think we're using the same definition of 'stable' when it comes to regional politics and societal trends. What is your definition?
 
America had control, like they did in south vietnam.
 
Now the right wing extremist view has been edited in. I wish you had included that call for genocide before I answered the first time. "Stability through genocide" is not a motto that will gain much respect in any circles other than your obvious usual haunts.

Making up nonsense is a good way to get yourself banned. Just thought you should know.

Vincour can you please so something about this? That's over the line. I never said such a thing.
 
I don't think we're using the same definition of 'stable' when it comes to regional politics and societal trends. What is your definition?

His definition is obvious...fascism has "put down" all resistance.
 
Back
Top Bottom