It appears that Wikipedia is ruled by a lobby or something like that. I tried to add a short paragraph about both Civ and RFC, in a very pertinent page - Alternate history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_history#Video_games It seems silly to me that Civ is missing in such page, and RFC makes Civ even more pertinent. The change I made was immediately reverted by a user. As I know that it's adviceable to first discuss about "controversial" changes, I kindly asked him why did he undo. He deleted my question in his page again and again, quite rudely. Then, since communication is impossible, I tried to readd the text and he has just done undo again. Anyone, please check if there's anything wrong in what I wrote (but I really don't think so) and readd it - especially if you are a registered user, he won't be able to oppose indefinitely.