Wonders of Destruction 2

Originally posted by MadScot
It's one way to try to make sure some of your nukes survive a first strike. (Same logic as missile subs, basically.)

Although the fixed silos look impressive, I doubt they would survive a direct hit, and with modern ICBM CEPs that's quite likely.

If I recall correctly, one of the rationales for the B-2 was to try to take out the mobile ICBMs (since it's much easier to retarget the bomber than to retarget an ICBM)

Oh I know why they put them on trains, it's the large vertical cylindre on the photo that I don't really get the necessity of. Nukes fired from subs don't have those, and they work fine anyway, and I haven't seen the cylindre before...

atlas-d-icbm.jpg


Atlas ICBM...
 
Too bad the US stopped a 4 billion USD deal between Israel and China... Quite a lot for 4 planes, isn't it?

now this should defend us against Iraq:
arrow_out.jpg


And in case it fails we always have these babies to strike back ;)
ShavitOfeq5s.jpg


(Alright, not exactly this one... This is the sattelie launcher version)

And in the near future we'll have this super cool weapon - Laser!!! (just a picture from a presentation... I couldn't find the picture showing the real laser destroying targets. I had it in a magazine but I can't find it now)
a131i04.jpg
 
THEL, Tactical High Energy Laser, for G-Man ;)

katyusha.jpg


Above: Sequence of a rocket intercept demonstration by e THEL laser, September 2000. In these photos, THEL/ACTD laser spot focus on the warhead (top) of the 5 inch diameter rocket, and detonate it (center), thus effectively "neutralizing" the rocket. The gases emitted by the explosion create excessive drag which tears the fragmentation casing into several parts which continue on their ballistic trajectory. (bottom of image series) Below: THEL Radar and fire control system

you can watch a video of it here: http://www.trw.com/image/gallery/0,1242,2_12^2^12^25,FF.html#
 
Originally posted by IceBlaZe
THEL, Tactical High Energy Laser, for G-Man ;)

Thnx. Actually the one I saw was a bit different - you could see where the beam hits the rocket because the area turned red, then it turned white and started to smoke, and then it exploded. :D
 
Originally posted by Mikoyan
F-2 Looking mean
fsx_17.jpg


Grrrrr!!!
fsx_19.jpg


Yeah!
fsx_07.jpg


Ahhh....
fsx_22.jpg


Nice X's!:goodjob:
 
Originally posted by insurgent
Oh I know why they put them on trains, it's the large vertical cylindre on the photo that I don't really get the necessity of. Nukes fired from subs don't have those, and they work fine anyway, and I haven't seen the cylindre before...

The cylinder is the casing for the missile (essentially the launch tube). Subs do have them, just they are built into the vertical position anyway. So they aren't so obvious. Look at a cut-away of any boomer and you'll see a pile of canisters in the missile room area.

And if memory serves, MX (now 'Peacekeeper') was supposed to be cold launched from the silo, with the missile plus canister ejected from the silo then the rocket firing. So even ground silo based missiles could have canisters, sometimes.

I would hesitate to scale from the drawing - from the style I'd say it's a "Soviet Military Power" illustration, which were notoriously inaccurate. But I seem to recall that even Trident, which is a relatively short stubby missile, is about 30-40ft long, so would be rather tall if stood on a railway car. And Scalpel is probably longer range than Trident, so is likely to be bigger. The railcar looks very long - unfeasibly so - but I suspect it's just a dreadful drawing.
 
Thanks, MadScot! :goodjob: Makes sense...
 
When I'm a multi-trillionare, I'm buying one of these for joyriding:
F-14%20fly-by.jpg

F-14%20Tomcat.jpg


What I'd like to do if I were ever forced into the military:
ah6406w400.jpg

What I would really do if I were ever forced to join the military:
dias_large.jpg

The joy of 21st Century military service.
 
flame tanks, my favourite kind of weapon.

flame.jpg


msg074.jpg


pan3f12.jpg
 
I'm ignorant as to the visual nature of biological and chemical weapons containers, regarding storage, transportation and weaponization. If I was to identify such a weapon what would the criteria be?
 
Time to get this wonderful thread on it's feet again, here are some pictures:

Ching-Kuo F-CK-1, Indigenous Defence Fighter for Taiwan.
idf-aidc.jpg


Mitsubishi F-2, Japanese strike fighter based on the F-16, one of my faves.
f2-01.jpg


Ka-50 Hokum.
ka-50-hokum.jpg


Tornado.
tornado-19990428-f-7910d-512.jpg


Admiral Ushakov (Kirov), the world's largest Cruiser
kirov-DNST8908439.JPG


We need more posts in this thread!
 
Sweden's very attractive JAs-39 Gripen multi-role fighter: in the air:
JAS39_Gripen_01.jpg

JAS39_Gripen_02.jpg

on the ground:
JAS39_Gripen_03.jpg

being re-armed:
AGM-65_on_JAS-39.jpg
 
The Harrier family:
USMC Av-8B Harrier
AV-8B_Harrier.jpg

RAF Harrier GR.7
Harrier_GR7.jpg

'International' Harrier IIplus
Harrier_II+.jpg

FAA Sea Harrier FRs.2 (now F/A.2, shortly to be prematurely withdrawn from service)
Sea_Harrier_FRS2.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom