Originally posted by MadScot It's one way to try to make sure some of your nukes survive a first strike. (Same logic as missile subs, basically.)
Although the fixed silos look impressive, I doubt they would survive a direct hit, and with modern ICBM CEPs that's quite likely.
If I recall correctly, one of the rationales for the B-2 was to try to take out the mobile ICBMs (since it's much easier to retarget the bomber than to retarget an ICBM)
Oh I know why they put them on trains, it's the large vertical cylindre on the photo that I don't really get the necessity of. Nukes fired from subs don't have those, and they work fine anyway, and I haven't seen the cylindre before...
Too bad the US stopped a 4 billion USD deal between Israel and China... Quite a lot for 4 planes, isn't it?
now this should defend us against Iraq:
And in case it fails we always have these babies to strike back
(Alright, not exactly this one... This is the sattelie launcher version)
And in the near future we'll have this super cool weapon - Laser!!! (just a picture from a presentation... I couldn't find the picture showing the real laser destroying targets. I had it in a magazine but I can't find it now)
Above: Sequence of a rocket intercept demonstration by e THEL laser, September 2000. In these photos, THEL/ACTD laser spot focus on the warhead (top) of the 5 inch diameter rocket, and detonate it (center), thus effectively "neutralizing" the rocket. The gases emitted by the explosion create excessive drag which tears the fragmentation casing into several parts which continue on their ballistic trajectory. (bottom of image series) Below: THEL Radar and fire control system
Thnx. Actually the one I saw was a bit different - you could see where the beam hits the rocket because the area turned red, then it turned white and started to smoke, and then it exploded.
Originally posted by insurgent Oh I know why they put them on trains, it's the large vertical cylindre on the photo that I don't really get the necessity of. Nukes fired from subs don't have those, and they work fine anyway, and I haven't seen the cylindre before...
The cylinder is the casing for the missile (essentially the launch tube). Subs do have them, just they are built into the vertical position anyway. So they aren't so obvious. Look at a cut-away of any boomer and you'll see a pile of canisters in the missile room area.
And if memory serves, MX (now 'Peacekeeper') was supposed to be cold launched from the silo, with the missile plus canister ejected from the silo then the rocket firing. So even ground silo based missiles could have canisters, sometimes.
I would hesitate to scale from the drawing - from the style I'd say it's a "Soviet Military Power" illustration, which were notoriously inaccurate. But I seem to recall that even Trident, which is a relatively short stubby missile, is about 30-40ft long, so would be rather tall if stood on a railway car. And Scalpel is probably longer range than Trident, so is likely to be bigger. The railcar looks very long - unfeasibly so - but I suspect it's just a dreadful drawing.
I'm ignorant as to the visual nature of biological and chemical weapons containers, regarding storage, transportation and weaponization. If I was to identify such a weapon what would the criteria be?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.