Would you save your fellow man?

[Elrohir]

If it is (was ) my worst enemy, no, not at all.

Edit: Besides, it can't really be "murder" can it? I'm not at all well-informed in criminal law, but I doubt doing nothing means "murder". At least not in Sweden I guess...

In the US it is. "Depraved Indifference to Human Life", that can be Murder 2 or manslaughter, depending on the circumanstances. (And this this case I think it would be, as you could save someone's life at not cost or danger to yourself) If you honestly thought your enemy would get up and kill you if you helped him then you would have a case for not doing so.

I voted to save everyone, by the way. I don't really have enemies, just people I don't really like, and I would take the moral highground and save them even if they wouldn't do the same for me. There's a reason I'm one of "The Good Guys".

 

[Ramius75]

save them all, thou im tempted not to when its George Bush, but what the heck...

 

[Babbler]

Definitely my friend and stranger. I not quite sure about my enemy, it would depend on how rotten this person was. I would give to him or her if I thought they could changes their ways and at least bury the hatchet (as one person said already). But if this person would never change -- or so malicious as to never want to change -- I would withhold the antidote, easy.

But really, I be so preoccupied with horror the situation, I would never be able to save any of them, or my sanity.

 

[azzaman333]

as you could save someone's life at not cost or danger to yourself

but it could potentially cost you your life in the future if you used the antidote on them and ran out then got the disease.