Hygro
soundcloud.com/hygro/
Better than California will be a failed state by the transitive properties of Zimbabwe.
It means Canada can afford to be liberal. And so can Australia. California being a state would just cause mass emigration, and the die-hard promoters of secession would flee first(irony). Again you really think these people are capable of doing anything? Honestly.So when you say "Canada is financing its shenanigans with oil export and other natural resources" what does that mean, then? Are the shenanigans being a sovereign country? That can't be it.
It means Canada can afford to be liberal. And so can Australia. ]
It is commonly defined as in to spend resources on supporting people not deserving it.What do you understand "affording to be liberal" to mean?
It is commonly defined as in to spend resources on supporting people not deserving it.
What sort of spending, and what is "not deserving it", though? Give me some specifics, man.
specifics on what? Canada and Australia being resource based economies? You can look that up on wiki.What sort of spending, and what is "not deserving it", though? Give me some specifics, man.
specifics on what? Canada and Australia being resource based economies? You can look that up on wiki.
Yes well i admit it is an interesting topic but i don't think it is relevant to the thread we are currently located in. The relevant part is that California can not become another Canada, because these regions are not alike at all, and Californian income comes from stuff that is primarily American, thus i find statements like "China will not stop buying Californian products" particularity absurd.What spending you're talking about, and on whom. You described Australia and Canada as "being able to afford to be liberal" which must mean that you think the two countries are spending money on certain things you consider to be "liberal" policies. You also described that spending as going to "undeserving" recipients, which must mean you have in mind schemas of deserving and undeserving people. I want to know what spending you're talking about in what policy areas, and who the undeserving are. You must know this, because you said these things.
Hilarious. Who writes this stuff?California's fiat would be stronger than the US dollar.
So people will stop watching porn if California leaves?.
Jesus christ since when did caring for the poor, the sick and the hungry become a goddamn weakness?wait wait wait a second, you guys are actually arguing how California would be better off not part of the union? What are you smoking? The state with the biggest number of illegal immigrants, the highest proportion of people on welfare, a state with a gigantic trade deficit, a state with virtually no water reserves?
Just read their wikipedia page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California#State_finances
"California imports more electricity than any other state, primarily hydroelectric power from states in the Pacific Northwest (via Path 15 and Path 66) and coal- and natural gas-fired production from the desert Southwest via Path 46.[173]"
"California, with 12% of the United States population, has one-third of the nation's welfare recipients.[166] California has the third highest per capita spending on welfare among the states, as well as the highest spending on welfare at $6.67 billion.[167] In January 2011 the California's total debt was at least $265 billion.[168] On June 27, 2013, Governor Jerry Brown signed a balanced budget (no deficit) for the state, its first in decades; however the state's debt remains at $132 billion.[169][170]"
The only way for them to sustain those policies would be to print their own money but it wouldn't be backed like the US dollar is so who would have faith in it? You'd get rampant inflation and economy falls apart. California is one of the worst off stats fiscally. I mean people can dream about some utopian liberal country where it's all like silicon valley everywhere but that's not realistic. They would end up either bankrupt or kicking people out/stopping immigration and/or having to cut spending dramatically. The only thing they have going for it is pure size and scale of economy but they'd still be dwarfed by the rest of the US.
https://www.mercatus.org/statefiscalrankings
I could lone you a rocket and space ship built here too but I'm too busy stuffing my face with avocados.California's fiat would be stronger than the US dollar. This wouldn't even be a good thing.
Brb switching from my California designed phone to my California designed computer to flesh this out.
Jesus christ since when did caring for the poor, the sick and the hungry become a goddamn weakness?
Stop talking about your fellow Americans like a burden. We look out for one another and we can damn well afford it.
How else do you stop the gays from growing up to join the military and destroy it from the inside?Probably when JESUS said to cull the weak by letting them die of disease and starve.