I just ended up starting a new game, Im more of a CE player, and therefor Im used to tech pretty strongly throughout the entire game, and getting stronger as time goes by, Im not used and I HATE the lightbulbing SE which everyone seems to run. I like the WE/SSE where I settle my especialists instead of bulbing, and this approach is imposible without the Mids, now I realize how OP Phi/Ind would be, right now for the type of SE I like to run I find Ind much more valuable than Philo unless I have Stone in the BFC or on a spot where I can found my very next city.
If you play like Augustus, spam forums, leverage Ind into the Parthenon and run Pacifism, the Philo bonus becomes negligible specially considering that with Philo you would probably not get The Mids nor The Parthenon nor TGLib.
What I have against the lightbulbing SE is that there is a point where poping GP just gets really hard plus even when you get some, a lightbulb is only good for half a tech, plus when you think of all the beakers you waste lightbulbing some techs worth less than 1K beakers its just not profitable.
Once you reach a certain ceiling you either make the painful transition to a CE, or go all out war to leverage your current lead, its just to close ended honestly I dont play for the scores I play for fun and I really dont go all out for a victory condition I just take whatever the game offers me, I strive for a thriving civilization not for some obscure World War campaign that I was planning since 4000 BC.
Whats diplomacy for then huh? Ill just DoW you in my way to Victory, been there done that too many times since Civ I, this is the first Civ game that I feel is worth playing till the future Era and Im not wasting that winning all my game in the Renaissance just because I dont know how to play past there.
Finally I feel the Lightbulbing SE has gone too far, some people plan it so well it becomes borderline exploitative.
Well this didnt have much to do with my original topic so iguess Im starting a new one.