JohnRM
Don't make me destroy you
Illegal and would not have one...
Well, who said she doesn't need your permission, you couldn't do much against it if she wanted to abort the fetus.blindside said:Voted the third option to spice things up.
I'm not too sure where I stand. For the most part I've been pro choice but I waver, partly because I would never allow it on a girl I impregenated.
Read the actual poll question.blackheart said:I can't vote because I'm a guy and can't have an abortion. But either way, I wouldn't know until I cross that bridge.
If these teenagers wanted to keep their baby, they wouldn't abort them. If abortion were not an option, they would likely give them up for adoption. There's quite a demand for babies.Atlas14 said:I have a question: Does anyone know whether it costs more to keep an abortion clininc running or for normal people to pay taxes to support millions of tennager's children because they weren't smart enough to use a condom?
Atlas14 said:I have a question: Does anyone know whether it costs more to keep an abortion clininc running or for normal people to pay taxes to support millions of tennager's children because they weren't smart enough to use a condom?
cgannon64 said:My question is, if the majority of Americans think abortion is wrong, why do they consider it different than murder, or rape, or any number of things that are considered immoral and made illegal by the majority?
The demand for abortions far outstrips the demand for babies. I support abortions and would support my wife or daughter if they made such a choice. My support of abortions is a practical one. People will always want the option, so we should provide a safe alternative. I would prefer a cheap, safe morning after pill. I would prefer that people were never faced with the very difficult choice of aborting a thingamabob. I would prefer that people were smarter than they are. But they aren't. Life is hard enough as it is; kindness is better than condemnation.Keirador said:If these teenagers wanted to keep their baby, they wouldn't abort them. If abortion were not an option, they would likely give them up for adoption. There's quite a demand for babies.
Turner_727 said:Like Hitro, I don't feel the need to impose my morals on another person.
If I were pregnant, and in a dirt poor condition that I couldn't afford the child's education and others, I would choose the abortion. Why would I want to bring another life to this world just to suffer? The same also applies when I find that the fetus has some disease, disable or whatever.
Call it murder if you want to, I would rather a child die at a young age than to suffer for his whole life.
Elrohir said:Then join us in stopping women from imposing their morals of death upon those who have not yet lived.Don't you see that they are imposing their views on their children just as much as we are trying to impose ours on theirs? Isn't it better to err on the side of life and caution rather than death?