1700AD Scenario Development Thread
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
Not reallyOnly Leoreth has
Doesn't look like there's space for it without ruining London.
soul-breathing
Emperor
How about Liverpool or Newcastle? Seems the British Island is a little empty now.
NorwegianSalmon
Warlord
- Joined
- May 22, 2013
- Messages
- 151
I know.. but it's just.. weird
Maybe it's weird only because I'm not familiar with that haha.
By the way, is it a good city location? Because I never settle there..
It also happens in Denmark, where Copenhagen is on a separate island from Jutland. And Japan is also made into one giant island for playability. Same with the Philippines. And Tierra del Fuego is also merged with South America. It happens quite a bit in RFC.
UnholyMudcrab
Chieftain
I'm pretty sure I've seen the AI found Newcastle before. It's either on the deer north of London or another tile north of that. Liverpool I don't think I've ever seen.
The Southerner
Warlord
The AI found Newcatle reasonably often. The spot that Liverpool would be on IRL is called Manchester in the game (lots of rivalry there).
Also the spot that should probably be called Carlisle (one N of Manchester) is just called Manchester in the game ... and is Cardiff or Swansea etc (IRL) still called Bath? Always thought that was really odd - maybe Rhye was a Jane Austen fan with a strange sense of geographical accuracy?
soul-breathing
Emperor
I prefer that the goals before 1700 counted as "failed", and goals after 1700 counted as "not yet". Because the Golden Age when you finish 2 goals will be useful for your game, even when you try to win another kind of victory.
soul-breathing
Emperor
Er... I'd say Russia ...
And maybe Siam and Turkey? This two both have 1 goal before 1700AD, 1 goal in 1700AD, and 1 goal after 1700AD.
mykeedee
Warlord
Frankfurt and Hamburg shouldn't be under Prussian control. Hamburg should go to Sweden or Britain and Frankfurt should be Independent.
FinalLegendZero
Prince
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2013
- Messages
- 548
To what end? Both cities are inside Prussia's flip zone.
mykeedee
Warlord
Those cities are in Prussia's flip zone to push out whatever holdings the A.I has in Germany proper from the past few millenia. Since we are starting in 1700 we don't need to worry about that and have this 173 years early German Empire.
Moshe Dayan
Da General
If not already Prussian, Hamburg and Frankfurt should both be independent (free imperial cities) and starting at war with Prussia. Also, Hamburg could start at war with Sweden, to make things interesting.
iOnlySignIn
Prince$s
Am I the only one who prefers Kiel over Copenhagen + Hamburg?
I think one decent city in the middle (Kiel) represents the conflict between Scandinavian and German interests in the region better, than two awful cities close together on either side (Copenhagen + Hamburg).
I think one decent city in the middle (Kiel) represents the conflict between Scandinavian and German interests in the region better, than two awful cities close together on either side (Copenhagen + Hamburg).
Wilhelm Meister
Warlord
That would cripple Prussia...so I disagree completelly.
iOnlySignIn
Prince$s
I'm not sure you understood me.
How does replacing 2 awful cities with a decent one cripple a civ? I would WB both Hamburg and Copenhagen out and replace them with Kiel if I ever play Prussia in the 1700AD Scenario, and I admit it's a form of cheating because it makes Prussia stronger.
Wilhelm Meister
Warlord
Please explain further your idea.
Similar threads
