Hahahah that's not realy him, is it? I've seen that before
In hockey? Have you read the whole discussion on the topic. The thing is exactly that the relations are off. Yes, Canada is the big favourite and greatest hockey nation, but a tie after 60 minutes is not embarassing, especially when you go on to win. If you go with soccer - what I think the allegory is aiming at - then it would be more like Brazil tieing with Netherlands or Portugal, i.e. second-tier soccer nations.
Maybe we're behind the times, but here we view Canada, the U.S., Russia, the Czechs, Sweden, and sometimes Finland in an elite group of "top hockey nations".. Everybody else is crap, and we should be able to kick their butts

If I asked the random Canadian on the street to give me a list of non-elite hockey playing nations, Slovakia would get mentioned, Belarus would be in there, Norway and Germany... not sure who else. I really didn't know that Switzerland had a decent hockey team and thought that Torino was a fluke.
The embarassment comes from the perception that you can't have a result like that against a non-elite team... as well as a lack of knowledge of the improvements in the Swiss game..
I used brazil vs switzerland as an example, cause if portugal or the netherlands came to brazil to play the home team, the home fans would know that portugal and holland are good teams, capable of beating brazil. maybe with a bit of difficulty at home, but brazilian fans are way more knowledgeable about the Dutch national team than canadian hockey fans would be about the swiss hockey team.
I think a lot of people here still think that the 3-2 OT win was the result of poor Canadian play, instead of some of it having to do with a good swiss team.. But if you guys have some more good results in the future, that perception should change.. We're all kinda stuck in that early 90s world where you load up your super nintendo, throw on blades of steel, and can play as canada, czech, russia, the u.s., sweden, or finland
