6 of 8 "successful" projects in Iraq are acutally failures

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phlegmak

Deity
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
10,966
Location
Nowhere
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6607039.stm

Iraq reconstruction 'not working'


Six out of eight Iraqi reconstruction projects hailed as successes by the US government are in fact failures, a US federal investigation has found.

The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (Sigir) examined works including a hospital, a barracks and Baghdad international airport.

Blaming ongoing unrest and spiralling corruption they said most were falling apart within as little as six months.

Faulty plumbing and wiring and looting have reportedly worsened the situation.

Corruption amongst Iraqi officials is cited as one of the main causes for the chaos.

According to the report $5bn is lost annually to the fraud and abuse which "afflicts virtually every Iraqi ministry", particularly the oil, interior and defence ministries.

Rise in violence

It also said that the continuing violence gripping Iraq was severely jeopardising the building and maintaining of facilities.

The US defence department says there are on average 1.4 attacks on critical electricity, water, oil and gas facilities each week.

And in addition "repair teams sent in after attacks continue to face threats, including kidnapping and murder," the Sigir report says.

In a separate development, an annual state department report on global terrorism said that 45% of terror attacks around the world in 2006 took place in Iraq.

The report said that worldwide there were 14,338 attacks, not including attacks on US troops in Iraq, a rise of 29% on the previous year.

Sigir was set up by the US Congress in 2004 after reports of widespread fraud and waste in US reconstruction efforts in Iraq.

It publishes quarterly reports on the situation, most of which have complained about a serious lack of progress despite almost $400bn (£200bn) having been spent.

Its latest report, published on Monday, is no different.

Long term concerns

Of the eight projects inspected, some just six months after being declared a success by the US officials, six were no longer functioning properly, the report said.

At Baghdad international airport the inspectors discovered that $11.8m had been spent on new electricity generators, but that already $8.6m-worth were not working.

It was a similar scene at a barracks built for special forces in Baghdad where four large generators, each costing $50,000, were not working.

And at a maternity and children's hospital in Irbil a sophisticated oxygen distribution system was not used because staff did not trust it.

In the same hospital needles and bandages were tossed into the sewer system, which frequently blocked, because an incinerator installed to deal with such waste was not in use.

According to the report, this was "because those initially trained to operate the incinerator were no longer employed at the hospital" and because the door to the incinerator was padlocked and no-one knew who had the key.

And at a recruiting centre in the town of Hilla faulty wiring was rife and blocked drains had caused the bathrooms to warp, inspectors said.

The Sigir team said that the speed and scale of the deterioration was so bad that it was doubtful whether some of the projects would even survive.

"These first inspections indicate that the concerns... about the Iraqis sustaining our investments in these projects are valid," Sigir chief Stuart Bowen said.

Expected retorts:
  • But what about the good that's being done!
  • Corruption happens everywhere!
  • It's the Iraqis' fault!
  • It's the liberals'/Democrats'/media's fault!
  • It's al Qaeda's fault!
  • Hey, it's only 6 reconstruction efforts.
  • Hey, how long did it take to rebuild Germany?
  • We got rid of Saddam!
  • Iraqis should be thanking us! --George Bush
  • The Bush administration is doing a great job.
  • Iraq is going swimmingly. -- Ann Coulter

My response:
I spent $500 billion and all I got was this lousy tshirt and civil war.
 
I guess the standards for "succesful" projects are really low.
 
I forgot this one:

Saddam was worse!

Most of the comments i see like this come from people who dont even know if what they say is true or not. Its just an argument with no evidence.
 
NOOOO, dont drag poor old Bill into this, he has nothing to do with it!
 
If the Iraqis weren't so pig headed as to actually shoot at our troops, Iraq would be the paragon of western life.
 
Wow, 2 sucesses? Kudos to the Admin!
 
Most Iraqis are better off. Under Saddam, only 1 out of 8 US government sponsored schemes succeeded.
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6607039.stm



Expected retorts:
  • But what about the good that's being done!
  • Corruption happens everywhere!
  • It's the Iraqis' fault!
  • It's the liberals'/Democrats'/media's fault!
  • It's al Qaeda's fault!
  • Hey, it's only 6 reconstruction efforts.
  • Hey, how long did it take to rebuild Germany?
  • We got rid of Saddam!
  • Iraqis should be thanking us! --George Bush
  • The Bush administration is doing a great job.
  • Iraq is going swimmingly. -- Ann Coulter

My response:
I spent $500 billion and all I got was this lousy tshirt and civil war.

Lets try actually reading the story critically. I know your list of excuses mean to be sarcastic in nature; however, its apparent you wrote it without actually reading your own story. If you had you would have noticed the following:

Blaming ongoing unrest
and
Corruption amongst Iraqi officials is cited as one of the main causes for the chaos
and

It also said that the continuing violence gripping Iraq was severely jeopardising the building and maintaining of facilities.

Wow. Things break down and deteriorate during a war. Thanks for the update.

Also, I find some of the 'reasons' given to why something is classified a 'failure' to be somewhat circumspect. Especially the ones which indicate that some generators were not working. I find it odd that something would be a failure simply because a generator isnt being used or not working. Generators need maintenance and can be prone to breaking down if left for long periods unsupervised. In an environment with lots of dust, it isnt suprising that such items experience a high breakdown rate; but I dont know that I would classify such as a 'failure'.
 
Lets try actually reading the story critically. I know your list of excuses mean to be sarcastic in nature; however, its apparent you wrote it without actually reading your own story. If you had you would have noticed the following:

Blaming ongoing unrest
and

Corruption amongst Iraqi officials is cited as one of the main causes for the chaos
and

That covers this one:
  • It's the Iraqis' fault!

Wow. Things break down and deteriorate during a war. Thanks for the update.
You added another good retort! "Things break down and deteriorate during a war." So in other words, it just happens! It's not our fault! I like it!

Also, I find some of the 'reasons' given to why something is classified a 'failure' to be somewhat circumspect. Especially the ones which indicate that some generators were not working. I find it odd that something would be a failure simply because a generator isnt being used or not working. Generators need maintenance and can be prone to breaking down if left for long periods unsupervised. In an environment with lots of dust, it isnt suprising that such items experience a high breakdown rate; but I dont know that I would classify such as a 'failure'.
That's another good retort! "The failures aren't really failures."

To be fair, you're right about one thing: None of these failures should be surprises.
 
And we are using a European news source (a biased one, at that) to report on an primarily American effort? That's just great! kthnksbi
 
That covers this one:
  • It's the Iraqis' fault!

Which is EXACTLY the assessment the very story you posted had made.

You would have seen that if you actually read your story beyond the title instead of immediately bashing Republicans as usual...

Yet, through your obsession with lambasting the neocons/republicans, you seem not to see the real questions which you leave unnoticed and unnatended: What is the cause of the failure and how can we solve the problem?

Like most of the Democrats, you only care for your chance to yet again bash your political opponents while proposing no alternatives and without even wanting to discuss this seriously and you probably did not even read much of the report.

Lead, Follow, or get the hell out of our way!

"TO OPPOSE EVERYTHING WHILE PROPOSING NOTHING IS IRRESPONSIBLE,"
President George W. Bush
 
Which is EXACTLY the assessment the story made.

You would have seen that if you actually read your story beyond the title instead of immediately bashing Republicans as usual...

Yet, through your obsession with lambasting the neocons/republicans, you seem not to see the real questions, What is the cause of the failure and how can we solve the problem?

Like most of the Democrats, you only care for your chance to yet again bash your political opponents while proposing no alternatives and without even wanting to discuss this seriously and you probably did not even read much of the report.
Here's my solution: Iraq is a complete failure: Leave. (Call me a liberal! I dare ya! It makes my nipples hard!)

"TO OPPOSE EVERYTHING WHILE PROPOSING NOTHING IS IRRESPONSIBLE,"
President George W. Bush
You're quoting George W Bush on responsibility?


By the way, if you could just say once, "But what about the good that's going on in Iraq!", it would completely turn me on. :love:

Don't forget to say those corrupt officials are part of Iraq's democracy (which is a success!). Oh man, if you could say that, oh god, I think I might just orgasm.

You're not addressing the fact that BILLIONS of US taxpayer dollars have been flushed down the toilet for this war, as if you don't care! That's ok! Who needed it anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom