A question for Muslim members

Angels don't lie :lol: They're the embodiment of goodness. Hint: they're called angels for a reason. And false yet again, no spirit is powerful or all knowing save God. God is the only perfect entity.
Again, Unicorny, it doesn't need to be all-powerful to have created the Qur'an. If you believe in spirits, and if you believe that spirits can have capabilities greater than man, then we cannot tell if the Qur'an was narrated by a mere spirit.

It would be like a primitive child finding a computer on the beach. No child could make such a computer, but to assume it was made by God would be wrong. We already know men can and do make computers.

It's your own mythology that there are spirits that can deceive men. We cannot tell if the Qur'an was narrated by an honest spirit. There's no way to tell. A spirit could call itself an angel.
(Here we're having a mere communication barrier. If I accept a powerful spirit talked to Mohammed, I still don't have enough information to know whether the spirit was being truthful).
Sura 4:82 "If [Quran] had been from other than Allah, they would have found within it contradictions"
Again, to make something that I cannot fault merely requires more intelligence than I have, not perfect intelligence. But this is just you being insufficiently skeptical. There are a host of faults in the Koran. You're just blind to them.
God states in the Qu'ran: "And We have certainly made the Qur'an easy for remembrance, so is there anyone who will remember?"

Well, this is not true. I cannot even read it. We must have different definitions of 'easy'. I know you think I am to blame, but it's not like I am an idiot. If you think learning a foreign language and then learning the historical context is 'easy', then you're bonkers.

I can pen a superior text very easily.
"And We have certainly made the Qur'an within the grasp of dedicated, educated, and intelligent people, so is there anyone who will remember?"

Which statement is more true? My statement includes your three your old child, since my statement does not exclude him. The Qur'an's statement is false, it's not easy. Have you memorized it?
 
“…if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.”

On this basis, a person can kill absolutely anyone at all.

All they need do is declare them guilty of murder (and with a broad enough definition of murder, it's easy enough to think that the occupants of the World Trade Center were guilty), or just plain spreading mischief in the land (accounting for neonates and infants), and it's a done deal.

Let's face it, Islam is pretty nigh morally bankrupt. Wouldn't you agree?

(Which isn't at all to claim that another religion is any better shape. Far from it, imo.)
 
I'll just refute this and prove that you have no idea of what you're talking about -

And now, the nail on your logic's coffin:

Then a very poor job He did.... Look at the maps.
Andes : Mountain: checked. Earthquake area: checked
Rocky mountains: Mountain: checked/ Earthquake area: checked
Hymalays: Mountain: checked. Earthquake area: checked
Eastern africa: Mountain: checked. Earthquake area: checked
Turkey/Iran: Mountain: checked. Earthquake area: checked


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Quake_epicenters_1963-98.png

http://vinesclassroom.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/4/2/12427946/3555880_orig.jpg[

Conclusion 1: from EVIDENCES: an area with mountains is also an area with
Eartquake.
So "And He has set firm mountains in the earth so that it would not shake with you...". Implies that mountains prevent earthquakes. This is disproved by conclusion 1.

Conclusion 2: One sentence is the Quran is false.

But you said the Quran is completly true, and is the word of God.

Problem with this logic, is you find even one thing untrue, then
- The Quran cannot be completly true
- It cannot be the word of God.

So, what are the choices:
- You can continue believing everything in the Quran is true. Your choice. But we have just seen it is not the case. Based on your own selection of quotes, we have seen there could be several interpretation, and more importantly some are wrong. So if you want to continue believing this, you will need to hunt for more facts that could accidentally correspond to you interpretation, twist them as needed, and disregard the others
- Are you can start to really think, realize maybe it is not a litteral truth...

The verse in question:

“And He has set firm mountains in the earth so that it would not shake with you...” (Quran 16:15)

Recent 21th century (year 2006) computational seismology research concludes:
Title: The San Gabriel Mountains: A Natural Seismic Insulator for Los Angeles

Abstract: The San Gabriel Mountains are a macroscopic feature, representing about 3km elevation and 30-60 km horizontal expansion, which sit to the north of the Los Angeles Basin. The San Andreas fault, which drives much of the seismic hazard for Southern California, slices through the northern boundary of the San Gabriel Mountains, where most of the mountain range lies on the southwest side of the fault. While the importance of the subsurface velocity structure on earthquake ground motions has been demonstrated for basins such as the Los Angeles Basin, previous work neglects a prominent surface feature in the Los Angeles area - the significant topography surrounding the basin. Here we show that the San Gabriel Mountains partially insulate metropolitan Los Angeles from seismic waves generated by a major MW 7.5 earthquake on the San Andreas fault. The topography of the mountains scatter the surface waves generated by the rupture leading to less efficient excitation of basin-edge generated waves and natural resonances within the Los Angeles Basin. It reduces the peak amplitude of ground velocity in the basin by as much as 50% in the frequency band 0-0.5 Hz. Our results demonstrate that large-scale surface topography can be a natural seismic insulator and should be included in a more complete seismic hazard analysis.

In other words, mountains are proved to act as a natural seismic insulator as the San Gabriel Mountains for example reduce the peak amplitude of ground velocity from a major >7.5 MW earthquake by as much as half. The verse in question agrees with that.

Having said that, please keep in mind that the Qu'ran being the absolute word of God transcends human science as the latter is imperfect, susceptible to error, new research, modifications, bias, and other errors.

So as more research and discoveries may or may not be made, we'll only uncover more miracles of the holy Qu'ran.

1) I think it is possible to find other example of prodigy child, who could memorize other long list of stuff. Does it mean all of these text are written by God?
2) If it was so easy, then EVERY children would know it by heart. Do all people know the Quran by heart? No.

1) Multiple 3-year children memorized the entire Qu'ran (over 600 pages, and 80,000 words), without being able to read or write Arabic, in fact, Arabic is not even their native tongue. They simply were able to memorize the entire Qu'ran based only off its phonetic sound. That's more than good enough evidence for me to believe that it is a book unlike any other and is the word of God.

Possible to find example of 3 year old children who memorized entire other books in a foreign language? That's hilarious. Please feel free to find any thing of that sort, anywhere. This should be interesting. Spend the rest of your life finding something like that.

2) Nonsensical argument. The fact that numerous illiterate children have the Qu'ran memorized entirely by heart is astonishing in itself, but it obviously takes time & effort. Or do you really think anyone would memorize it at will? :lol:

You people baffle me with your illogical nonsense.
 
Well, some people are so blind that they don't want to have a look at a whole map of the world with mountain chains and earthquke, and will find one small example and twist it as much as they can to fit their narrow minded view of the word.

You have a map showing hundreds of earthquake, correlated with mountain ranges, showing that in general earthquake are much more likely to happen in mountainous areas, and yetyou dismiss it as not contradictory with

"And He has set firm mountains in the earth so that it would not shake with you...” (Quran 16:15)" means mountains prevent earthquake and is true....

"Il n'est pire sourd que celui qui ne veut pas entendre". French sayings.

"There is no worse deaf that the one who doesn't want to hear".
 
In other news:

Dozens of Qu'ranic verses appear on the skin of a Russian toddler:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...s-appear-on-skin-of-miracle-Russian-baby.html

Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbeoZsR8BUU

Korpe%20bedeninde%20Quran%20ayeleri-6.jpg


I wonder what excuses they'll come up with now :eek:

Qu'ran: We will show them Our Signs in the universe, and in their ownselves, until it becomes manifest to them that this (the Quran) is the truth. Is it not sufficient in regard to your Lord that He is a Witness over all things?

I'll throw this one in as a teaser:

warda.jpg


A 6th century illiterate Arabian man apparently knew exactly what an exploding nebula (millions of light years away) looked like?

Verse in question: "And when the heaven splitteth asunder and becometh rosy like red hide"

Feel free to believe in whatever you want, my job is done at conveying the truth. Those that seek the truth with an open mind and heart will find it. As for the rest of you, God says:

"And the example of those who disbelieve is as that of him who shouts to those (flock of sheep) that hears nothing but calls and cries. (They are) deaf, dumb and blind. So they do not understand." It's the exact same as shouting and yelling in front of a flock of sheep. You're only wasting your time.
 
Here's the same nebula in blue.

64883main_image_feature_211_jw4.jpg


Riddle me that, oh my wise, and best, belovèd!

(Just So Stories.)
 
I'm not sure that showing an example of an exceptional child's success is evidence that something is 'easy'.

I can assure you, that verse is very, very false to me. I cannot even read the Qur'an. Saying it's easy to remember is just not true. Again, it takes incredible callousness on your part to suggest it's 'easy'.

If my Korean TV came with a Korean manual but was advertised as 'includes easy-to-understand manual', I'd think the advertisement was a lie. The courts would agree.

Look, I'm not an unreasonable person. I believe that there were dinosaurs. I believe my mom loves me. I believe that Pluto has a Moon. I believe that there are good reasons to say 0.999(repeating) = 1. I'm not overly skeptical.

But if you want me to think the Qur'an is easy to memorize, you're just daft. I cannot even read it. You cannot say God intentionally made it in a language I don't understand (even though I'm a reasonable fellow) and then proclaim that the Qur'an is 'easy' for me. That verse doesn't apply to me, and it's entirely not my fault that verse is false for me.
 
It's mostly the interpretation that renders it false. Scripture in the hands of men is a wonderfully effective tool for Satan.
 
Here's the same nebula in blue.

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/64883main_image_feature_211_jw4.jpg

Riddle me that, oh my wise, and best, belovèd!

(Just So Stories.)

Good point. Another translation of the verse (it's only English that's limiting the meaning of the verse in question here if you're wondering): Dr. Ghali
Then, when the heaven is cloven so it becomes rosy-like ointment.

Confirmed yet again. An exploding nebula is definitely rosy-like. Only a daft person would deny that.

Easy. Quran invited photoshop

And yet hundreds of thousands of people verified or saw the verses embroidered on the toddler's skin - either that, or every single one of them was a blind idiot (watch the video if you care).

You're either really dense or completely in denial.

I'm not sure that showing an example of an exceptional child's success is evidence that something is 'easy'.

I can assure you, that verse is very, very false to me. I cannot even read the Qur'an. Saying it's easy to remember is just not true. Again, it takes incredible callousness on your part to suggest it's 'easy'.

If my Korean TV came with a Korean manual but was advertised as 'includes easy-to-understand manual', I'd think the advertisement was a lie. The courts would agree.

Look, I'm not an unreasonable person. I believe that there were dinosaurs. I believe my mom loves me. I believe that Pluto has a Moon. I believe that there are good reasons to say 0.999(repeating) = 1. I'm not overly skeptical.

But if you want me to think the Qur'an is easy to memorize, you're just daft. I cannot even read it. You cannot say God intentionally made it in a language I don't understand (even though I'm a reasonable fellow) and then proclaim that the Qur'an is 'easy' for me. That verse doesn't apply to me, and it's entirely not my fault that verse is false for me.

You're the poster who came up and insists on the idea of a fictitious "bad" spirit as the source of the Qu'ran if I recall correctly, right?

In Islam, angelic spirits follow the will of God at all times because they were commanded to do nothing else and have no free will. However, there are also spirits that seek to deceive humankind and get them to err (Jinn). The devil (Iblis) is one of the Jinn himself.

The Qur’an specifically warns against the spirits who tell humankind to err. Now the question is, if this book was narrated to Muhammad by a spirit that wants to deceive humankind and deviate them from God, why in the world would this same spirit enjoin people to worship Allah and declare itself the enemy? Such a notion is contrary to rational thought or any common sense for that matter. I'm pretty sure I've stated that before. But I'm not surprised, words simply fly over your head it seems.

As for your personal perceived difficulty of memorizing the Qur’an: the Arabic text uses the word, “Dhikr”, which means remembrance. The word for memorization in Arabic is “Hifz”. The Qur’an does not say that it is easy for memorization, but for remembrance, meaning that it is easy to remember what the Qur’an is about, what is enjoins Muslims to do, what it prohibits Muslims from doing, and the meaning of its examples and parables.

Knowing you however, you might bring up the argument by saying that the Qur’an is only easy to remember for those who are dedicated, educated and intelligent. In that case, if that was true, then the Qur’an’s message would only be limited to those who have ample amounts of time to dedicate to its reading, those who were fortunate enough to receive an education and those who were born with the ability to acquire knowledge and skills.

While the last skill applies to every human being and is therefore redundant, not every human in the world has the time or ability to receive an education. That would make remembrance of the Qur’an exclusive for only certain people, which would not make it a universal book.

You may now argue that people with amnesia or mental disabilities cannot easily remember the Qur’an then. False yet again. The Qur’an says that it does not burden anyone beyond their means (In surat at-talaq and elsewhere). And because some of those people cannot even comprehend some of the obligations of the Qur’an, it means that they are not obligated to follow them.

Finally, you may argue that the Qur’an is then hard to memorize for non-Arabic speakers. No. Even though the Qur’an does not mention memorization in that verse, that there are several people around the world who do not know Arabic, yet have memorized it. Example: 3 year old Turkish child who has memorized the entire Qu'ran without even being able to read or know any Arabic. A miracle in itself. Give me an example of any 3 year child out there who has memorized an entire book (600+) in a foreign language that they could not even read or understand?

That proves that knowledge of the Qu'ranic language is not required, because you can easily memorize it by listening to it time and time again.

If you say the that anything can be easy to memorize by listening to it more than once, the Qur’an does not claim to be the only book easy to remember, so there is no argument to be made there.

@Borachio You're alleging that Islam is morally bankrupt? In Islam, murder is the act of one person killing someone else. The crime rests on the killer, and no one else, because every individual is accountable to their own individual actions in Islam. So your assumption that the definition of murder can be changed is false. Just because your definition of murder is morally bankrupt, it does not mean that Islam is morally bankrupt.


@Steph Still waiting for you to show me an example of a 3 year old child (or younger) who has memorized an entire book of over 600 pages in a foreign language that they could not either read or understand. Take your time.
 
No. I'm saying that the jihadists who flew planes into the World Trade Center thought that their acts were legitimate. They thought (to put it crudely) those occupying it were directly responsible for, or at the very least complicit in, deaths in the Middle East (and no doubt elsewhere).

Is your position that they weren't truly Islamic?
 
Which makes me wonder why there are Scriptures at all.

I also wonder why there is controlled combustion when I see what we've done with guns, bombs, missiles. But then I remember what else has been done with it.
 
^ I'm pretty sure that's not true. People are alike. Give them a holy book and they'll immediately start talking about what it means. And disagreeing.
 
Give them a holy book and they'll immediately start talking about what it means. And disagreeing.

I do not think that, in itself, is actually a problem. That is probably a goodness insofar as it keeps us humble and learning. It is when we are right that Satan has probably already locked in the game.
 
It's mostly the interpretation that renders it false. Scripture in the hands of men is a wonderfully effective tool for Satan.

Which makes me wonder why there are Scriptures at all.

I was asked upthread why a spirit would give Scripture to man. I cannot answer the question of why a god would narrate a Qur'an. I can answer why a malicious spirit would.
Unicorny said:
The Qur’an specifically warns against the spirits who tell humankind to err. Now the question is, if this book was narrated to Muhammad by a spirit that wants to deceive humankind and deviate them from God, why in the world would this same spirit enjoin people to worship Allah and declare itself the enemy? Such a notion is contrary to rational thought or any common sense for that matter. I'm pretty sure I've stated that before. But I'm not surprised, words simply fly over your head it seems.

And your ability to be rude is strong. Why would a deceitful spirit do such a thing? To deceive you. A trap must look pretty. What if the real Allah doesn't 'test' people and burn them for failing? This book would then have you believing horrid slander, and you're allowing your heart to justify awful things. What if the real Allah didn't torture Egyptian peasants in order to scare the Pharaoh? You're again believing slander about the real Allah.

You've read a book, a book that has no proof of true divine origins, and you're justifying the suffering of fellow people in your heart.

As for the whole 'remembering' thing, you're the one who brought up the memorization as evidence! If it's not evidence for that verse being true, then why'd you bring it up? Bait-and-switch?

meaning that it is easy to remember what the Qur’an is about, what is enjoins Muslims to do, what it prohibits Muslims from doing, and the meaning of its examples and parables.
Again, it's not easy. I cannot even read it. Stop saying it's easy. It's incredible misuse of the word 'easy'. To suggest 'easy' is the best word, the most 'perfect' word is just stupid.

Knowing you however, you might bring up the argument by saying that the Qur’an is only easy to remember for those who are dedicated, educated and intelligent. In that case, if that was true, then the Qur’an’s message would only be limited to those who have ample amounts of time to dedicate to its reading, those who were fortunate enough to receive an education and those who were born with the ability to acquire knowledge and skills.

While the last skill applies to every human being and is therefore redundant, not every human in the world has the time or ability to receive an education. That would make remembrance of the Qur’an exclusive for only certain people, which would not make it a universal book.

You've not confronted the objection. I actually cannot even see any logic.
"The Qur'an requires dedication and education to understand" is an obviously true statement. This prevents it from being a universal book. You insisting it's a universal book doesn't make my statement untrue. The Qur'an requires an education to understand. For some (i.e., me) it would be very, very hard to receive the requisite education. It's the opposite of easy.
 
I was asked upthread why a spirit would give Scripture to man. I cannot answer the question of why a god would narrate a Qur'an. I can answer why a malicious spirit would.

Is the damnation of Prometheus just?
 
The real miracle of the Qu'ran is its linguistic mastery over the Arabic language.

Sura 4:82 "If [Quran] had been from other than Allah, they would have found within it contradictions"

So, I'd like you to notice something. You've bragged about the awesomeness of the Qur'an. My main objection to it is that it deceives Muslims into believing false things. You can find instance after instance of Islamic evangelists trumpeting the English translation below (and there are many available translations).

And it is We Who have constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We Who are steadily expanding it. (Qur'an, 51:47)

Now, any astronomy student who said the universe was steadily expanding would be asked to go back and study. It's not a true statement. Now, you can hem and haw and try to waffle, but the natural reading of that sentence is untrue. I look through the other translations, and it's probably the most false of all the translations available (if we allow the idea that some of the translations don't even imply an expanding universe) if you're trying to link it to the Dark Energy discovery.

The weird thing is, there must be hosts of Muslims who are astronomers. Yet, this false statement is still passed around the Web as if it is evidence of God. You seem to think it was a good argument (or else you would not have done it). I don't know why the informed Muslims didn't correct the uninformed ones, but that's what happened (it's what happened to you).

Think about it, any non-Muslim who was impressed by that verse and then chose to convert would have converted based on a falsehood. Now, maybe the Qur'an says something other than that sentence, really. But you've also bragged about its clarity, its linguistic mastery. And yes, Muslims saw that sentence and believed false things. Then they tried to convert non-believers, who'd only be impressed if they too were fooled.

Now, how can I be impressed by a text (that you claim was easy to comprehend) that had you forwarding falsehoods? And how has this falsehood been retained in your community so easily?
 
El Machinae, your effort are pointless. When you are in a state of mind where you believe a book is the verbatim words of God, and it cannot contain any error, then you can look at any criticism objectively.
Because if you do, all your little world crumbled. When tiny error means the book is not the word of God.. And it's a truth that deep inside them some people are not ready to face.
And so they will disregard all the good objections you can throw at them, and instead grab at all the small evidences they could find to support their claim, and how true they really are doesn't matter as long as it gives them back some fundation to continue living in their comfortable fantasy world.
 
Back
Top Bottom