You can say that all you want, but if you can't provide proof that my proofs are wrong, then your attempt to prove that my proofs are wrong has no proof. And so I see no reason to believe it.
I can reasonabely prove you wrong. For example, if you said from now on everyone is going to be mortal, sure I cam't technically prove you wrong (unless I wait), but if you provide no evidence or use a bunch of irrelevant examples

, than I can safely prove you wrong to within reason.
So what? Money is merely a different form of barter system. How are you going to stop me from bartering with other people to get them to do "unwanted" work?
Well, that was more a technicality that was annoying me.
Who cares why? It's unimportant. Maybe I'm crazy. Or maybe I think your system is an abomination against God that must be destroyed.
Well, than you would be treated as such (certainly not a citizen).
If you leave your citizens to do what want, some of them will accept my bribes--and just like that, your system ceases to exist and is replaced with capitalism.
There is nothing preventing them from doing what they want, its just if they don't want the system (ie, they want the brines) than they aren't part of the society.
And I refuse to listen. Now what? You're going to have to remove me by force. But what if nobody in your town wants to do it? (And if they don't want to do it, it's not worth doing--your words, not mine) You have to GUARANTEE that somebody in your town will be willing to do it. The only way to do that is with some kind of artificial incentives. And the minute you use those incentives--your system ceases to exist.
If you are hurting people, than you will be removed if the people want you to be removed enough that they actually do it. Why do I have to guarentee that they will remove you.
If I don't want to do it your way, then your way is not worth doing.
Exactly, you wouldn't do it, any nobody would offer real incentive to stop you from leaving.
And I do not want to do it your way. My way means six hours a day of unwanted labor. Your way means a much larger amount of unwanted labor.
First of all, fine nobodies going to force you into the society.
Second, that is completely untrue. There is drastically less unwanted work because you would only do something if the product from it was worth the work. For example, I would probably set up (or rather help set up) a sustainable permaculture farm, and after that simply eat my surroundings. After that, I would do whatever little things to keep up the land (a little fixing of shelter mainly and help resolve any hurt feelings in community meetings, supporting anything neccessary for a comfortable existance; there is no need for advanced medical care, no need for a huge police force if you support compassion enough, no need for constant huge firefighting force when you have relatively little fire risk, no need for huge water system if you live near a clean river, etc.) and then do whatever the hell I wanted. Spend time with my love, get together with friends and make up something fun. Write a play, whatever, formulate a bunch of postulates and base an entire geometry off fictitous postulates, draw in the sand, if you're still reading this you're stalking me.