Aaron Russo on the NWO and fed reserve.

[zenspiderz]

Here is a interview you won't see on CNN or BBC.

Director Aaron Russo interviewed by Alex Jones..

Topics of conversation - Fed reserve, NWO, 911 and Aaron's own experience of being recruited by Nick Rockefeller.

If you watch it (1hr duration) what is your feeling on what he says? 'Head in sand/ bottom in air' it is not happening!!! OMG!!!

OR 'Hell yeah, tell it like it is man! Better to die on your feet than live on your knees!! Let's whip some banker butt!!

OR meh so what?

OR something else (provide details)

EDIT
Please only respond to the thread and poll if you have actually watched the video. Spam posts and votes are not appreaciated.

 

[JohnRM]

Can we get a link?

By the way, I think that Aaron Russo is full of crap. I watched his "America: Freedom to Fascism" movie and there are a lot of things that he claims in there about Executive Orders and such that are just not true. You can look up Executive Orders and laws and find out for yourself. Either he lied or he was mistaken. Either way, he is not credible. The 16th Amendment was legally ratified. Opponents claim that it was not because there were some capitalization and punctuation discrepencies between the states' various copies sent as ratified to the Secretary of State. Meaningless. The other reason they say it was not legally ratified is because Ohio's admission to the Union was not officially recognized until 1950, because of some obscure missing detail from the past.

I hope Aaron Russo contracts mistakes a sheet of Lead for a sheet of Tin when he makes his hats and gets Lead poisoning. Woogie boogie douche bag! (Aaron Russo, not the OP)


EDIT: I should mention that some of what he says is true, but they are innocuous details that don't mean anything to the average person. He seems to use truths to hide his lies/mistakes, in between.

 

[JerichoHill]

He's a blowhard

If you use NWo in anything but talking about Hulk Hogan and wrestling, you're insane

Also, he's a pox on true libertarians

 

[zenspiderz]

Whoops sorry somehow I forgot to provide a link!

I have edited the op to provide a link.

And here is another. Aaron Russo interviewed by Alex Jones

 

[zenspiderz]

He's a blowhard

If you use NWo in anything but talking about Hulk Hogan and wrestling, you're insane

Also, he's a pox on true libertarians

The rather fascist sounding phrase 'New World Order' has been used by both George Bush senior and Tony Blair's heir apparnent Gordon Brown.

Are they insane?

 

[woody60707]

The guy is a nut, and been debunked many many times. I'll get a link for in a sec.

Here we go. http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/JustNoLaw.htm

Thats the law that says you have to pay taxes. So i guess we know who is the liar now when he says "there is no law that say you have to pay taxes"

 

[Nobody]

He's a blowhard

If you use NWo in anything but talking about Hulk Hogan and wrestling, you're insane

Also, he's a pox on true libertarians

i agree and any one named russo + NWO even more so.

 

[Pontiuth Pilate]

stopped reading at "alex jones"

 

[ParkCungHee]

The rather fascist sounding phrase 'New World Order'

You can stop right there.
What is Fascist sounding about a concept for a transnational order, what would Fascists, ultranationalists who assert the sovereignty of states, want with a "New World Order"?

 

[zenspiderz]

You can stop right there.
What is Fascist sounding about a concept for a transnational order, what would Fascists, ultranationalists who assert the sovereignty of states, want with a "New World Order"?

Wasn't that what the Nazi's desired?? To impose a world order upon the rest of us? Actually that is the comic book history / post-war propaganda line, which I am a little skeptical about.

If by fascist you mean a genuine nationalist such as UKIP then no the new world order is not fascist sounding. However scratch the surface of many 'nationalists' and you find an imperialist. Often they do not want just national soverignty but soverighnty for their own nation or race over others..

The New World Order gang of our time are of course anationalist. Meaning they personally could not care a toss for nationalistic sentiments. The empire they wish to forge is made of military coercion, financial usury, institutional chicanery and of course mass deception that trancends the abstactions of national boundaries. Nations, races, cultures are to be used and abused for ultimate goal of total dominion over the planet and all that walks, crawls, swims or flies upon it.

So in short you are being too pedantic in fussing over my suggestive use of the term fascist in describing the term NWO and all it implies.

Could we not discuss the topics actually raised in the vid?

 

[zenspiderz]

He's a blowhard

If you use NWo in anything but talking about Hulk Hogan and wrestling, you're insane

Also, he's a pox on true libertarians

Ad hominem = very weak argument

 

[Old Spice]

The world is coming to an end and theres nothing anyone can do about it!

You have to be a nut job to listen to this stuff.

 

[zenspiderz]

The world is coming to an end and theres nothing anyone can do about it!

No it is not.

You have to be a nut job to listen to this stuff.

ad hominem = very weak argument = boring

 

[Old Spice]

zenspider = nutjob

These are just claims made by a single person, backed up by quotes from a few others.

 

[zenspiderz]

zenspider = nutjob

These are just claims made by a single person, backed up by quotes from a few others.

ad hominem = very weak argument = boring = old spice

 

[Old Spice]

You don't have to cry just because everyone see through the guy. Unless you are him...

 

[Xanikk999]

ad hominem = very weak argument = boring = old spice

I still dont see your argument.

 

[zenspiderz]

You don't have to cry just because everyone see through the guy. Unless you are him...

more ad hominem yawn.

 

[Xanikk999]

more ad hominem yawn.

Ok is that your argument? The fact that you cant defend this guy?

Dont post a link just tell us why this guy should be taken seriously.

 

[Old Spice]

Although you have yet to post anything meaningful, so what is your arguement, and what facts support it? Or is "ad hominem" the only word you know?