TheMeInTeam
If A implies B...
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 27,993
his credibility matters for liking him. not for lawsuit though, and much less for the goal of making other people also look non credibleThere's another crucial factor that's not discussed, which is Hans' credibility.
Regardless of whether or not Chess.com has a collaboration with Magnus, there appears to be evidence that Hans has greatly understated the amount of cheating he engaged in during his time with the online platform.
Furthermore, his inadequate post-game analysis and sketchiness of his rating increase pattern appear to further put into question on how authentic he is as a player. These aren't factors that prove he cheated in that match, but are potential red flags.
yeah. it's why i think they'll have a hard time avoiding discovery. releasing a written statement that says "we engaged in conspiracy to penalize this person in particular which would not have happened but for the conspiracy" is something where the court will raise eyebrows.Chess.com was hasty enough to release a smug multi-paged report where they admitted they only banned Hans because Magnus said he is cheating, without meaning to ban him if that didn't happen. At the same time, being in talks to buy Magnus' chess app.