Hero
NPC
I vote for settling in place and having a city 1N of the gold.
There can't be a hidden resource where your settler starts.
I agree with Welnic and Cabert.
I vote for settling in place and having a city 1N of the gold.
There can't be a hidden resource where your settler starts.
NW city can overcomes the
advantage of settling in place.
It seems to me that, whichever direction Sisiutil commits to, there's the prospect of an interesting Shadow game going the other way.
(17 to start, 15 reasonably), it has the potential for specialists or mines, and the food to support it. Or you could even chop out the Pyramids if you put the time in. Overall, plenty of pluses going on with this start. CivSetä;5750152 said:Second city 1N of gold is not that great on the long run, but will do in early game.
As much as I like the +1from settling on a plains hill, the +6
from gold is huge in the early game.
1NW of the settler's current position is the best opening imho. Getting the gold online very early will GREATLY accelerate early research. Waiting to get it online in a second city means you waste many precious early turns that could be supercharged by the gold pit.
oriented due to the seafood (and palace) and the gold definately more so. Both sites have strong openings as in they can both build a worker w/ 25%
bonus immediately and both have access to the 3
corn for early, early growth. 
What was it some of you said in the previous attempt at a game with Peter? "Let Sisiutil be Sisiutil"?If you settle-in-place you probably won't get around to founding a city N of the gold for some time and by then the gold will not give you a big boost (so you may never end up settling there).
I would be tempted to move the settler 2 turns to the tile E of the gold and settle there on turn 3. That gives a 3 food/gold capital plus leaves the other 3 seafood for a second city. I've found that I get a better start if I have two good cities as opposed to one great city and one mediocre city.
However some have made the point that the second city location will probably be determined by where copper/horses show up, and then later city locations may be chosen to deny land to AIs. So it is very possible that you won't be able to found this "second" city for a while. With that in mind I suppose settling NW is probably the best option.
On another note, I don't think that any of us (i.e. non beta-testers) have enough experience with BTS map scripts to accurately predict what we're likely to encounter.


That is a very cool idea. You could have 3 shadow games, couldn't you? Since I'm considering 4 different sites for the capital. That might be overkill, though.It seems to me that, whichever direction Sisiutil commits to, there's the prospect of an interesting Shadow game going the other way.


settle where you'd like and have fun with this one. BtS rocks and the new big and small map (i also like hemispheres) is excellent.
- so if you want a wonder early think about this one 
