cubsfan6506
Got u
Won't be anything taht we recognize as intelligent. The odds of them being bipedal and haveing a similar thought process are so unlikely.
What does bipedalism have to do with intelligence?
It is impossible that we are alone, and if you think we are, you must have been hiding under a rock from 8 thousand years.
What?Suuuuure.... And it's impossible that from almost 7 billion* humans in the world, none has exactly my fingerprints, and if you think there isn't someone out there to have exactly my fingerprints, you must have been hiding under a rock from 8 thousands years.
And several of them deemed capable of life, by the size and distance from their star.FYI, there are only 264 extra-solar planets discovered.
Exactly 272 planets discovered by November 2007.
Don't you understand that, for something for which there is no evidence, you need to PROVE its existence to convince people to accept it, not to DISPROVE its existence to convince people to not accept it?
Suuuuure.... And it's impossible that from almost 7 billion* humans in the world, none has exactly my fingerprints, and if you think there isn't someone out there to have exactly my fingerprints, you must have been hiding under a rock from 8 thousands years. FYI, there are only 264 extra-solar planets discovered.
*7 billion humans in the world = 7,000,000,000 humans in the world. And none of those has my fingerprints (I do know we didn't reach 7 billion yet, but we're well over 6 billion).
Exactly 272 planets discovered by November 2007.
Don't you understand that, for something for which there is no evidence, you need to PROVE its existence to convince people to accept it, not to DISPROVE its existence to convince people to not accept it?
The same article also lists plenty of possible explanations though...For those of you who think there MUST be intelligent life simply because there are so many stars, so many planets, etc read up on Fermi's Paradox. Basically it says that if intelligent life has existed elsewhere then even a very slow expansion rate would mean that that life and signs of that life would spread across the galaxy in a short amount of time(in galactic sense). But if this is the case, why haven't we discovered it?
For God's sake - if the universe is infinite it doesn't mean that the chance of life to exist is 1! Because an infinite universe does not equal an universe where everything exists.And the odds of our planet being the only one with life in the galaxy is like one in several billion/possibly trillion, and in the entire universe one in near infinite.
So you believe aliens not only exist, but they are here already, seen and recognized but only by some people, just not by the opaque masses. Right?There is plenty of proof, but most of it is eye-witness accounts, photos, and videos.
Vulcan.........For God's sake - if the universe is infinite it doesn't mean that the chance of life to exist is 1! Because an infinite universe does not equal an universe where everything exists.That belief comes from some people's inability to understand the notion of infinity.
Do you also believe there must be some Mona Lisa paintings in the outer space?
The "infinity" argument is simply void! Do you agree with me that since the universe is infinite, the space between all particles in the universe is also infinite? So, there must be life in the space between all the existing particles, because it's infinite, so what are the odds of it not happening!That's how this logic goes!
Well our planet is young, only 4 billion years, while the universe was created around 13 billion years ago, while as we have seen with Mars it only take about 3 billion years for a planet to have life sustaining abilities(to what we would call life). So there is most likely a planet which was created more than 8 or so billions years ago, that retained its life sustaining abilities, and developed a sentient species who would of had a several billion/million head start on us and most likely has harnessed some type of FTL travel, whether it be through wormholes or whatnot. So yes, I do believe they have visited Earth.So you believe aliens not only exist, but they are here already, seen and recognized but only by some people, just not by the opaque masses. Right?![]()
The same article also lists plenty of possible explanations though...
Dude, FTL has been pretty much ruled impossible. And the abiity to sustain life doesn't mean life. Certainly there are a large number of worlds in habitable zones of stars but we have no idea what the probability of a world in the habitable zone has of having life.Well our planet is young, only 4 billion years, while the universe was created around 13 billion years ago, while as we have seen with Mars it only take about 3 billion years for a planet to have life sustaining abilities(to what we would call life). So there is most likely a planet which was created more than 8 or so billions years ago, that retained its life sustaining abilities, and developed a sentient species who would of had a several billion/million head start on us and most likely has harnessed some type of FTL travel, whether it be through wormholes or whatnot. So yes, I do believe they have visited Earth.
No evidence, I'm not saying they don't exist just that there is no scientific basis either way.Why not?
That's kinda a crappy argument for believing we will eventually run into ET. What we should do is believe that we might but with uncertain probability.Actually, because I'm a pragmatic investor. I'm thinking along lines of Pascal's Wager. Planning to eventually run into ET life will lead to a different gameplan than not. And the consequence of being wrong (either way) is lower (imho) my way.
Aliens?