Dude, FTL has been pretty much ruled impossible.
Dude, we thought the sound barrier could never be broken.
Dude, FTL has been pretty much ruled impossible.
I mentioned that I'd bet there are. But I'm going to use my leisure dollars to do the betting.That's kinda a crappy argument for believing we will eventually run into ET. What we should do is believe that we might but with uncertain probability.
No, sheep. And they sure taste good.
Welsh immigrants?
Dude, no we didn't. The sound barrier was never considered to be physically impossible to break. Some thought that planes that do it are technically infeasible, but that's signficantly different then disallowed by the laws of space and time.Dude, we thought the sound barrier could never be broken.
No, the universe being infinite is not sufficient assuming that life exists. However, if we also assume that the universe is smooth (that is to say that we are not in a special part of the universe), then we can deduce that somewhere out there there is a region just like ours. That is if you were travel far enough, you will find another earth. (Of course relativity and age prevent such travel, but it is still conceivable albeit impossible)For God's sake - if the universe is infinite it doesn't mean that the chance of life to exist is 1! Because an infinite universe does not equal an universe where everything exists.That belief comes from some people's inability to understand the notion of infinity.
Do you also believe there must be some Mona Lisa paintings in the outer space?
The "infinity" argument is simply void! Do you agree with me that since the universe is infinite, the space between all particles in the universe is also infinite? So, there must be life in the space between all the existing particles, because it's infinite, so what are the odds of it not happening!That's how this logic goes!
Why wouldn't there be life elsewhere? To claim we are alone, you have to assume that earth is unique in all the universe. That is tough to support.
Once life begins, if we assume that evolutionary principles apply everywhere, then you can be sure that it will expand and grow in complexity to the fullest extent permitted by its environemnt.
Well, it is concievable that abiogenesis is so rare that in an average universe like ours less then one strain of life would develop.Why wouldn't there be life elsewhere?
In fact not, to claim that we are alone you have to assume that the probability of life in any given universe like ours (same laws early mass distribution etc.) is small. Now this certainly is an unwarranted assumption, but it's also unwarranted to claim it is large.To claim we are alone, you have to assume that earth is unique in all the universe. That is tough to support.
Evolution principles doesn't imply that, it allows it, but in no way requires it.Once life begins, if we assume that evolutionary principles apply everywhere, then you can be sure that it will expand and grow in complexity to the fullest extent permitted by its environemnt.
Well, it is concievable that abiogenesis is so rare that in an average universe like ours less then one strain of life would develop.
Dude, FTL has been pretty much ruled impossible.
UFOs can't be a collective delusion spanning thousands of years.
There must be, but none here. And I doubt we will ever really meet one, which makes me sad, but if we did, that would be sweet, assuming they're intelligent AND not a galactic killing machine.
Here is the thing. Out of the whole of God's creation, I seriously doubt he graced only this one little mudball with life.