The typical "cities" of modern era of my empire are: monument, granary, 3-4 skyscrappers. They don't look like cities. Especially when they are compared to large groups of buildings in Civ V.
It's not just about their look, although some look ridiculous, like Gandhi, Pedro II or Qin Shi Huang. Some look indeed well. But it's also their characters, that can become too much focused on their agenda. This is the sad case of whining trio: Pedro, Qin & Monty, or Cyrus the Great being reduced from a great Persian king who created the grand Achaemenid Empire, and who is celebrated even in Bible, to a mere scheming backstabber (though his VA, model and animations are good - I get the feel of power from him speaking and moving).
Leaders in Civ V may be "wooden", but it wasn't a big issue to me. Some were quite energic (Ahmad al-Mansur was moving quite a lot, if I remember well), and some were understandable not to move much (90 years old Enrico Dandolo
). but at least they were able to say no/yes, ask me what I want, or just being able to greet me, unlike Civ VI's leaders that are just sighing, nodding, shaking their heads, rolling eyes or waving their hands
About Ramesses, I sort of remember his legs, him having boring theme (the peace one, the war theme is decent), him sounding bored and arrogant... and speaking Egyptian Arabic
And I remember him sitting on a throne, which is something Civ VI is lacking - different leader poses (sitting on throne, horse, and even lying).
That would be nice. But I'm not fully convinced if agendas should be kept.