Wikipedia nationalist theory dictates that all information on Wikipedia with regards to ethnic boundaries before the current time is false.
So it's 1914? Rhodes should be Italian, you should probably fix the Dobruja, and Varwnos already mentioned the wonky Greco-Bulgarian border. Also, Krakau is in the Habsburg empire.
Marburg was German in 1914...but the rest of Untersteiermark...hmm. Outside of Marburg and some of the other towns I expect it was Slovenian-speaking. They had that irksome national renaissance during the 19th century...Depends on what grounds you're denoting ethnic identification.
What the hell is purple on the wc qual. map?
Srs: Dude, come on. Bottom of the page footnotes highlight a key dispute between English-language and German-language (and Slovene-language, I expect) Wikipedias as to the nature of that Bloody Sunday thing. The history section is constructed such that virtually the only thing discussed is the ethnic situation immediately around the time of the end of the Habsburg state and the creation of the Yugoslav kingdom. Clearly the stuff in there is a matter of contention. Hell, half the history section is sprinkled with [citation needed] indicators.Stop with the Wiki-bashing please now dachs theres a good boy thank you very much much obliged I appreciate it
Krakau/Kraków/Cracow/. .. .. . was under Habsburg control until '18, not '15. Piłsudski was still in command of the Polish Legions until '16, when he became minister of war of the kingdom that the Central Powers set up in Congress Poland. Which transitioned nicely to a role as minister of war of the republic that replaced it.
Srs: Dude, come on. Bottom of the page footnotes highlight a key dispute between English-language and German-language (and Slovene-language, I expect) Wikipedias as to the nature of that Bloody Sunday thing. The history section is constructed such that virtually the only thing discussed is the ethnic situation immediately around the time of the end of the Habsburg state and the creation of the Yugoslav kingdom. Clearly the stuff in there is a matter of contention. Hell, half the history section is sprinkled with [citation needed] indicators.
And you can't tell me that some of Wikipedia's most ******** edit/revert wars are centered around idiot nationalist crap in Europe. As are some of its most egregiously skewed history articles, as recognized by Wikipedian leadership.
Not srs:k w/e wiki $uxx
Well, your Krakow looks weird then.So what is the problem?
Krakow is under Hapsburg rule.
Credit where it's due, I suppose. I'll own that there's useful and true stuff in Wikipedia, and a lot of it.Oh yeah, big time. But your putting the boot into it a lot lately, there still almost always far far more right than wrong in its articles.
The number of embassies in a country can be seen as a measurement of how important the rest of the world considers that country to be.
![]()
Belgium have such a high number because Brussels is the seat of NATO and EU, Switzerland because Geneva is the European headquarters of the UN. Accredited embassies are not counted.
They are both major regional powers, and South Africa has resources that are important.I doubt that, no reason to think for example that Egypt and South Africa are important
Is there any chance you could do a map for teams that qualified legitimately and another for cheating handballing smug car-salesmen scumbags who got through because Sepp Blatter wanted them to?
You know Gran Colombia was Venezuelan and it dissolved because the other parts of Gran Colombia were to poor for the Venezuelans to support.Venezuela didn't divorce, they left.
But interesting events nonetheless. Dominion of California, Canada and Oregon? By american settlers going to Lousiana do you mean Louisiana or former French territory north of Louisiana?
What's the green in northern USA?