Actually I agree with Luiz. Your comparison with China and the In
cas and how the Incas with more dynamic leadership could have prevented what the Qing dynasty failed at is completely incorrect. Do you know why the Europeans didn't make any large efforts to formally conquer huge swathes of Chinese territory? Simply too much people in China, a situation that is completely different then in the Incan Empire. And the fact that conquering China would be contrary to their goal of opening her markets to trade unlike in the Incas where they just wanted all their gold and etc
You must understand, that Europeans saw things out of the potential profits of success, hopeless optimists if you ask me most of the time but let's see. A nation filled with gold, silver, and all other sorts of rare and valuable metals. Sure, they've fought off one small invasion force of less then a thousand men. How long will it take for them to send more? And more? Let's say Spain sends a 5,000 man army a year or two after pizzaro and is defeated.
You think the other Europeans are just going to sit there and let the Incans be? If I were them, this would be a prime time to strike as the Spanish forces should have weakened them severely enough so that when "we" attack we'll destroy them.

Not to mention that the Spanish themselves are a very stubborn and determined people. Lose once? They'll just keep on coming at the Incans. Just look at their wars with the Dutch
That's not even mentioning about the pride and piety of the Spanish royalty and her nobility. We got beat by a bunch of primitive barbarian pagans? It's a test by God to determine our faith in converting these pagans (and taking their money) that, and they won't let someone like the Incas get away with insulting them. Yes, the English got away with it, but England isn't made up of people using bronze as weapons, have no gunpowder to speak of and have as rumors have it mountains of gold/silver/ and etc.
