The fact that you present it as if Albania is somehow entitled to land belonging to other countries is nothing sort of dangerous. Im sure you would not like it if people had dreams of taking land from your own country, and it is not their fault that it is small and poor.
It is very well known that all countries in the balkans have national myths. However if you think that loving your country is the same thing as singling out historic recourses which in your view present it as something great, then imo you are very wrong and have a destructive relation with history. You did not at all mind the fact that some cities you named as "ethnically albanian" today belong to others, and moreover albania has no more connection to them that they do, if any at all. You go on an on about Kastrioti as if he was some sort of deity, but in reality he was only another warlord who in the end got defeated and that was all. Just because you have nothing else to be proud of you create legends about relatively insignificant figures, and use them to spread false sense of being the victim. I have news for you: everyone in the balkans at some time played that card. More news: we are all victims, Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria, the Ottoman Empire, all were good and the others bad and thieves. Check nationalism in the other balkan countries and you will see the same rotten undercurrent; you are not presenting anything particularly different, but make the mistake of being proud of it.
I do not mean to be rude to you, it is just that i am very bored of people who cannot understand that the one and only way that this region of Europe is going to get better is through civilization and normal relations. No one cares about albanian megalomania; most people outside Europe do not even know where Albania is. You have every right to love your country, like i said, but do not let love become hatred for other countries.
In conclusion i would like to say that i have nothing against albanians, but dislike heavily any idea of a greater Albania and myths about it.
Anyway this post became larger than i originally intended.
All this coming from the Greek that created a scenario about the first Balkan War without representing the Albanians which started it,
To say that the ethnically Albanian cities have nothing to do with Albania is grossly exaggerated lie. The cities I have from Montenegro, Kosova, and Macedonia are all populated by majority Albanians. Ulqini, for example, a coast given to Montenegro by the great powers over a century ago, despite the staunch Albanian resistance to such injustice, is still 95% Albanian today. My forefathers lived there, and my ancestors lived there, and my family still lives there today. Roughly 1/3 of Macedonia is comprised of Albanians (the Macedonian government 'officially' claims 1/4), and the cities I mentioned are all Albanian inhabited. Kosova, as you know, is +90% Albanian as well.
The only exception might be in Greece, where the Cham Albanians are a) gone, or b) now consider themselves Greek after the genocide committed by the Greeks against the ethnic Albanians and the heavy assimilation efforts carried out by the government. So, some of those cities in Greek may not have a majority Albanian population today as a result of Greek's xenophobia and ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Tosk Albanian population there, but the cities in other present-day countries listed in this mod are still to this day Albanian-inhabited.
As for your attempt to discredit Kastrioti: he was given the title Athleta Christi for his defense of Christendom. When Mehmet the Conqueror conquered Constantinople, Kastrioti continued to defeat his armies in battle. The Byzantine stronghold was defeated, but Kastrioti wasn't. He secured the assistance of 4 Catholic Popes and other European Allies, and was continuously successful in keeping the Ottomans at bay for 1/4 of a century, allowing the West to increase its defense and the maturation of the Renaissance. Aside from being a military mastermind, a genius at guerrilla warfare, the first to introduce compulsory military service in Europe, the enlightened Voltaire wrote "Had the Greek Emperors acted like Scanderbeg, the empire of the East might still have been preserved." To say otherwise shows a severe misunderstanding of history and an indication of your anti-Albanian bias (as seems to be all the rage amongst Greeks, Albanian-flag burners and racists that they are).
As an Albanian I have plenty to be proud of: ancient history aside, even past Gjergj Kastrioti's successful resistance for Christian Europe (which he never failed, the Turks took control of Albania 12 years
after his death), I am proud first and foremost of Mother Teresa, which many people considered to have been a living Saint. My nationalism is pride for my people and my history, and the contributions we've made to world history. You can look up famous Albanians to learn more about those contributions (such as some of the pioneers of the Greek independence movement, a Catholic Pope from the 17th century, the man who created Viagra, etc).
I don't desire a greater Albania, but I know that there is such thing as an ethnic Albania: an Albania before it was dismantled by the Great Powers of Europe, and plans between the Greeks, Slavs, and Italians to split it amongst themselves, where Albanians still live today as they have for centuries.
) and fight for their independence because the danger of foreign occupation or even worse a new homeland in the anatolian mountains created by a population exchange was imminent(Actually many turks of epirus refused their "turkishness" to avoid this).It is sure that the new formed states tried to seize as much territory they could from the crumbling and ethnically mixed Ottoman Empire.In order to support their efforts they claimed that every territory with their ethnic population (even if it was a minority of 2 families in a 500 family town) was their ethnic land.Everybody accused their neighbors for extreme and illogical claims 
I could always post some, if you're interested. 
