1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Are you pre-ordering?

Discussion in 'Civ6 - General Discussions' started by EgonSpengler, Aug 19, 2016.

?

Preorder?

Poll closed Oct 18, 2016.
  1. Yes, I have or will preorder the game.

    386 vote(s)
    68.7%
  2. No, I'm going to wait and see.

    176 vote(s)
    31.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. eMeM

    eMeM Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    83
    I miss the times when a beta tester was paid for his job.
     
    Jeckel and Zantetsuken like this.
  2. Nefelia

    Nefelia Prince

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    458
    Voices lost in the wilderness. Who will hear your plaintive wails?

    :(
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2016
  3. Frank327

    Frank327 Warlord

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    288
    Obviously it sounds really self-centered to announce to the world I'm not buying this game day 1 anymore (I won't) but maybe it's some use to other potential buyers who don't feel like watching the battle royale before making a decision or for publishers/developers looking for why potential costumers won't buy Civ VI. And it's not like writing down opinions hurts anyone. Single player AI is a very important aspect of TBS and grand strategy games because single player is so much more accessible than multiplayer in the genre. And bad AI can really ruin the experience. For example one of the biggest issues with CK2 for a while was also that AI rulers kept seducing everyone, which seems like a minor error/annoyance but in practice can ruin so much of the fun. The battle royale showed so many faults to the AI that i don't think I can properly enjoy single player games against them. There's no use pretending the AI doesn't matter because it clearly does.

    Still it was a brave decision by the publishers/developers to do this battle royale before release (I suspect 2K made the decision) and I'll applaud them for that.
     
    Zantetsuken likes this.
  4. Zhahz

    Zhahz PC Gamer

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,615
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I'm not going to repost the epic I put in the "royale" thread and I don't see the point in starting multiple threads on the same topic (moderation is neato).

    But the bottom line is, ok.

    If you're going to base your purchase decision on ONE AI vs AI game, when that's not even how Civ is designed (it's designed to feature players) then....ok

    Seems akin to picking your next car based on a bike ride.

    If you're convinced that is representative of a game with unlimited replay and that all AI vs AI games would play out the same way, so be it (even if they even discuss variance in such matches IN the video/stream).

    Dunno why you need to share, but ok.
     
  5. Nefelia

    Nefelia Prince

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    458
    Games got more complex over the last two decades. Beta testers can only do so much, and even a robust Quality Assurance team pales in comparison to millions of players playing the game in ways never imagined by the developers.

    This has been the reality of computer gaming for at least several years. It is not going to chance any time soon.
     
    Oleary likes this.
  6. Frank327

    Frank327 Warlord

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    288
    Well, our point of view is that these conclusions aren't from one game and we're quite certain we know how the AI will work in the release because:

    1. In the pre-release the AI (from videos) was already really easy to conquer and had a lot of failings. Basically just build 2 slingers, upgrade them to archers, take those plus your warrior to the enemy and you win an easy war. Later on it doesn't get any more difficult and AI doesn't seem good at winning wars in general. So we were looking how it improved in the newest version but:

    2. Not only did it not improve (AI only built decent armies when they had unique units) but the AI developer straight up said that domination victories never happened and at most 3 capitals got taken. Once again, even with overwhelming military AI can't win wars and later on they have really crappy defensive armies.

    3. Multiple civs had poor settling/developing which points to it being a general AI problem and not one specific to the terrain that the AI happened to have.

    4. A lot of people expected these problems because of poor AI in Civ 5. To see an expectation confirmed (we hoped to be proven wrong) is a powerful thing.

    Besides, in most maps half of the AI won't even interact meaningfully with the player for most of the game. So yes they have to be able to interact properly with each other which can be tested in AI vs AI. And the lead AI developer didn't seem surprised at anything that happened, so I assume what happened was normal.
     
    Toulouse likes this.
  7. Nefelia

    Nefelia Prince

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    458
    The AI has always been weak, but that has not stopped me from enjoying 2682 hours of Civ 5, according to Steam (definitely inflated from AFK time), as well as several hundred hours of Civ 4, 3, 2, and 1.

    The various write ups and videos let me see the play style, features, innovations, and weaknesses of the game. And thus far I am quite enthused. ;)

    Chances are that I will get far more than my money's worth, just as I have with all of the other Civ games. If you wish to be more cautious with your money, all the power to you.
     
    AinEiken, Xyriach and Oleary like this.
  8. eMeM

    eMeM Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    83
    Then I'm glad I don't buy games at release anymore. But this particular game hasn't been touched by "millions of players playing the game in ways never imagined by the developers", a stream run by the developers already exposed a major problem, yet people feel a need to buy the game to support.
     
    Toulouse likes this.
  9. Xyriach

    Xyriach Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    99
    Location:
    Channel Islands
    I'm buying the game because I want it. Just like I wanted Civ 2,3,4 and 5...it's got nothing to do with support, it's plain wanton avarice.
     
    KVS, Oleary, Nefelia and 1 other person like this.
  10. Oleary

    Oleary OF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Michigan
    In an article a few months ago professional AI programmers believe they have a program that will challenge the masters of the game Go. 1000s of hours we're put into the program and near the end the program played itself over and over to understand all of the permutations. We all want an AI that will play as well as we do (we'll not quite, we don't want to get beat) but as others have said that's just not realistic...
     
    Zantetsuken likes this.
  11. Zantetsuken

    Zantetsuken Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2016
    Messages:
    86
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    At least at the current moment anyway. One can dream though.. *whimsical sigh*
     
    Oleary likes this.
  12. AinEiken

    AinEiken Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    16
    I agree - the game is, at least for me, more than *just* the AI.
    Sure, you need a decent enemy to compete and to polish your skills. So far, every CIV-AI lived and worked mainly through cheating (bonuses). But that's okay - you had to refine your strategy to compete with that (and not superb but generic AI-driven decisions).

    But I'll play that game anyway. Don't need an additional meaning after the release. And yeah: money is money.
    But 60 € or $ is fairly cheap for a potential zousands hours of play. Pff.
     
    Nefelia likes this.
  13. Nefelia

    Nefelia Prince

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    458
    Some of us just want to play early, and don't particularly mind a weak AI as we set about exploring the game and its new features over the following weeks. If they improve the AI, great. If they don't, I'll just retchet up the difficulty level again.
     
    Zantetsuken likes this.
  14. Plus Ultra

    Plus Ultra Conquistador

    Joined:
    May 27, 2016
    Messages:
    702
    Location:
    Spain
    Oh, this again.

    Yes, bad Firaxis, evil Firaxis!

    If not for mindless fanboys like myself that pre-order without understanding the severe consequences of such behaviour, this game would have perfect AI on release... damn those Civfanatics, they ruined Civ!
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2016
    Zantetsuken likes this.
  15. jjkrause84

    jjkrause84 King

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    959
    Location:
    UK
    Exactly. The discount is the only reason I ever pre-order anything. I've been burned once or twice (Rome 2...), but even then it is not so bad as I tend to only buy 1-2 games a year (if that). I'm willing to gamble the price of a standard dinner date on a game series I've loved since childhood.
     
    Seek, Plus Ultra and Zantetsuken like this.
  16. RealHuhn

    RealHuhn Emperor

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Germany
    +1, people act like the AI is the only fun part about CIV games. For me, learning different strategies with different civs, optimizing tile yields, tech paths, timings etc. is entirely independent from the AI performance. It's important for the longevity of the game that Firaxis keeps working on improving AI decision making and tweaking unit upgrade paths but I'm pretty confident that it can be tweaked with good feedback from the community.
     
  17. Ranbir

    Ranbir Civ junkie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    598
    Location:
    Herts
    Waiting for my 25th anniversary box. It's truly been 25 years of my 30 year life. I keep checking if its been shipped yet.
     
  18. Abraxis

    Abraxis Emperor

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,312
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    There are always other ways to increase the difficulty as well, independent of AI. Waiting at the beginning for variable amount of time gives you basically infinite scalability even with braindead AI. You can also just play against yourself, for the most part. Seeing how quickly you can achieve a space race, what your highest score can be, one city challenges, or adopting an underdog civ mid-game and trying to make them win.

    Obviously being limited to doing these things isn't ideal, but for me at least it's enough that I'm not too concerned about a malfunctioning AI on release. From what I've seen it seems competent enough at least for me to have my own fun around it. I'm at least confident Firaxis won't abandon this series before giving this game as much love as they gave Civ5, turning it into the masterpiece I think Civ5 BNW is.

    Civ6, meanwhile, already looks like it's off to a much better start. And I am significantly more intrigued by the unstacked cities than I was about the unstacked units. All the systems in fact seem to have a lot more potential.

    I'm still not really confident about the decision, and I don't think ore-ordering was really that smart, but I can easily live with the worst case scenario, and best case seems too good to let slip by. I would have easily payed $80 to play the limited press build we've been seeing.
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2016
    Zantetsuken likes this.
  19. Xur

    Xur Prince

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Messages:
    405
    You should see a Civ5 AI battle and compare. Civ5 AI is a mess... got so many troops that it cant even move them. While Civ6 AI isn't perfect, I actually think it is an improvement over civ5.

    When you see an AI that has warriors in late game, it's a matter of bad upgrade design - there's no upgrade alternative when you dont have iron or niter. This has nothing to do with the AI. An expansion with units can fix this, better mapbuilding can fix this and a mod with units can fix this.

    I'm not worried at all to be honest.
     
  20. Oleary

    Oleary OF Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Messages:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Michigan
    LMAO. I think there's a little bit of that in all of us!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page