Australia, a weak and pliant US colony ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Become a saudi style client, um no, just no.

Australia basically plays both sides, we sell crap to China and have a nice economic relationship with them, and we hedge against China militarily by giving token support to America whenever they want to invade some country far, far away (joining every american war doesn;t mean much when your contribution is next to nothing) and consequentially adding US military weight to any calculations involving Australia from a certain large, ideologically threatening state in eastern asia.

Also the editorialist is an idiot with no idea of Australian foreign policy at all. Furthermore in international relations no state in its right mind acts contrary to its own interests. Sure interests coincide (and in this case they do) but when they don't Australia will continue doing whats in its national interests and damn what the US says. We ditched the British for the US when they no longer fulfilled our interests, that should tell you how much "special relationships" mean to Australia (or any country) when it no longer serves the interests of the nation, especially when the guarantor of security is becoming relatively less and less powerful as time goes on. I would say that Australia will continue with its current course of sitting in the middle and siphoning off the best of both worlds (economics = china, military support = US) going about its own independent foreign policy of taking advantage of our pacific client states and bashing on those few pacific states who don't do what we tell them to do. (like Fiji for instance)
 
A eyebrow raising article, there has been trouble in Okinawa with the US Marines and they want to move to Aus ?
The USA to take over the Aussie foreign affairs, hmm, that would go down real well with the average ocker.
This will be interesting for Aussies, the 51st state ?

http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...manent-military-presence-in-australia/248266/

Although i wouldn't see this as an take over in any sense. I do see it as protecting Australia and her interests even tho the article say its probably not. meany nations around Australia are quickly modernizing and with population booming nations Australia is declining in population and our military which is slowly shrinking. Second Australia has an massive problem with patriotism in that we are some how brought up in thinking patriotism is bad, and is a problem we need to fix if we are to survive as a nation. so it would be almost to easy for the US to establish a base, so i think sadly that the Australian Government isnt taking it serious plus Julia Gillard is a weak Pm very one ive talken to hates her and that she's done less that Obama.
 
Yes, Gillard must be exorcised from office immediately.

-

For the record though Australias population is increasing substantially thanks to a steady 2.1 birthrate and immigration. Thing is everyone in the region is hedging against China, because they're scared to hell at the fact it can actually project power enough to threaten the cozy status quo of the region (and they are rather belligerent as well further making everyone wary of China).

Thats the only real reason the base is going to be established, balancing China and serving everyone but China's interests. This hardly means compromising our entire foreign policy compared to simply wanting to deal with a mutual problem.
 
Moderator Action: OP doesn't provide for any discussion, despite the OP being warned numerous times in the past. Anyone else is free to start up a thread on the topic if they can formulate an OP that does more than make a few cryptic comments and append a link.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom