Y'all really need to do something about the over active censor not coping with text strings being part of longer words.
I was getting blocked from talking about fire retárdant in a bushfire context for christs sake. That's not a fit for purpose tool. It is 2025, you surely can't still be struggling with the Sċunthorpe problem.
Yep. I repeat: I find it very hard to believe that XenForo's autocensor is less flexible and customizable than InvisionFree's was over 20 years ago, when I admin'd a couple of gaming forums, a Dune forum, and a Doctor Who forum and I'm the one who made the decisions about what would and would not be part of the autocensor.
It became an issue when 1. We couldn't discuss Christmas music because the name of a song triggered the autocensor due to a particular combination of letters; and 2. I had to deal with an individual on the Dune forum for reasons that were personal to her and she had a problem with the male staff - they wanted to permaban her and I opted to talk to her and find out exactly what the problem was. When I did find out, I set the autocensor so she could still post and it wouldn't cause my male colleagues to be upset. I fixed the gaming forum's autocensor so the Christmas song could be talked about.
Invision forums let you specify whether it's a specific string of letters alone, or if it's also part of a longer string of letters. The admins have the choice of how to set this.
In the case of XenForo, I wonder. There must be a way to use normal words in non-objectionable contexts. Kinda like pussy willows and chinks in armor and log cabins. The examples in my last sentence used to be censored, and I asked for a review of the censored words. I see that they came through just fine, so it's the staff's responsibility to evaluate the use of these words to see if they're used in a normal context or as sexist/racist terms.
The "r-word" is used likewise, in so many non-pejorative contexts like music, discussing automotives (even I know that and I've never driven in my life).
Every time I see "horsehockey" on the forum, this is the sort of thing that comes to mind:
It doesn't conjure a feeling of "Oh, thank you, CFC mods, for saving us from inappropriate language." It does conjure a feeling of "Come on, context matters, and we're not children. Don't treat us that way."
Does it make more work sometimes? Yeah. But that's what you all signed up for. I issued my own share of inappropriate language infractions years ago, and some of them were justified due to the context and others... well, I felt stupid having to issue the point or whatever, but the rules were the rules. It doesn't mean that the particular rule back then was a good rule, because it didn't make people suddenly improve their innate desire to use more acceptable vocabulary. And keep in mind that the rule in this case is catching people who are NOT swearing or being sexist or racist.
Note that there are some words I feel will always be unacceptable, due to definition or intent. But when a word is part of a larger word or it has a completely innocuous other meaning that is what the poster really means... come on, guys.
EDIT:
@The_J, are there others complaining about this on the XenForo support forum? Is there a way to mention that it's a problem and ask them to find a workaround?