It would just strike weird to me to have Italy in the scenario but Venice in the main game, the next European civ is going to be very interesting. Hopefully that'll be the dark horse. I feel like getting really surprised and see an outrage of people ranting that the civ isn't worth including.
That's certainly not a Khmer clothing style; the skin tone also seems paler, closer to Malay than Khmer. Also, is that a tattoo or face paint on the cheek? Also not a Khmer tradition.
What's the exact alphabetic connection with the 4 unrevealed civs?
told you kids no Italy with the achievements revealed the ways they did
So:
Assyria
Brazil
Majapahit
Morocco
Poland
Portugal
Sioux
Venice
Zulu
So:
Assyria
Brazil
Majapahit
Morocco
Poland
Portugal
Sioux
Venice
Zulu
So:
Assyria
Brazil
Majapahit
Morocco
Poland
Portugal
Sioux
Venice
Zulu
I just realized that if they wanted to, Pueblo is still a possibility (would come after Portgual)
Possibly now people will look more objectively at the "evidence" they believed so strongly pointed to Italy in combination and recognise its limitations.
Though based on nothing more than gut feeling I'd regard Italy as highly doubtful, and only felt it was a possibility due to some circumstantial evidence. The Italian states are one of the best-known features of European civilisation - I think that if Firaxis didn't consider Italy covered within Rome, an Italian civ would have made an appearance long before now, particularly since they already duplicated civs in Civ IV (Germany and HRE).
Vietnam is also a possibility. They did say there was a European civ tho... do the Moors count as European? In any case I do doubt Vietnam will be in.. it is most likely Venice and the Sioux/Pueblo, but it is not out of the realm of possibility still.