Wolfshanze
CFC Historian
I'm not talking in real-life... obviously WWII subs were much better then WWI subs... I'm talking about in Civ4... I don't want a sub with LESS then 24 strength (the current sub value), and I'm not really fond of making the sub any stronger then 24 strength...I don't. Split hairs? WWII subs (both German and Allied) were a class apart from the WWI variety. Had Nazi Germany been able - and prepared - to build U-boats in quantities, they might have starved Britain.
So... in Civ4, creating a sub simply for the sake of seperating WWI from WWII won't leave me much room in the combat value to justify it... in layman's terms... "splitting hairs".
I've created ships where I consider room to be in combat value... I have str-28 & str-32 nuclear subs and str-24 diesel-electric subs... I'm not really thinking there's anything to gain gameplay-wise in making a str-23 WWI sub and a str-25 WWII sub. I'm happy with the "multi-age" diesel electric sub I currently have (three subs total)... I don't think we need a 4th sub class... just my opinon. Heck, it'd be better to argue splitting-up Musketmen... we have ONE musketman unit that covers hundreds of years of musket use and development... that's a lot more then 30 years or so of diesel-electric subs.