Pfft... looks too much like a Mig-29...But, the Su-35 is cooler.
Besides, nobody has made a Civ4 model for this Russian MiG fighter yet...
![]()
You might want to add that to your first post.I have found a very (very) minor bug, but needs to get fixed and is easy enough for anyone to do on their end without having to download anything...
The Heavy Hussar for Poland slipped through on a minor issue... its tech requirement 'to build' is wrong... not equal to other Hussar/Cuirassier units...
Done.You might want to add that to your first post.
Mussolini will definately be in a future version... I almost put him in v2.70, but I still think the Mussolini in the LH section still needs a little texture work (though it's a definate improvement over earlier Duches).Hi Wolfie any chance of Mussolini & Italy appearing in the future maybe even Israel ?
When did it occur (about what year or how-long into the game), was it a specific event, did you research something, reach a certain point in the game, click on a unit, did it happen in the middle of a turn, between turns during the AI move, are you able to get past year-x by restoring a save game, does the crash re-occur at the same point, randomly or not at all?
You gave me the crash error report, but nothing concerning how/when/why/what-type of crash you got and if you can continue playing by restoring a save.
I wouldn't mind having another Civ to play with, as long as the civ was well made and has appropriate unique buildings and units.On Israel... to be honest, haven't really put much thought into them... do folks want Israel in the mod? I
America is mostly a melting pot of European influences. Just because a nation's culture has its origins from other cultures doesn't make it less unique.Romania, I can't see it. But I'm not up on their history as much as others. Seems to me to a great extent we're talking about the post-German HRE, i.e. Austria, right? Yes, Romania had it's own culture, but mostly it was just the melting confluence of Turkish and European influences.
Why not? They've a history of excellent military history (if limited in scale). Regardless, are we going to determine the quality of a civilization by the size of it's military?
Sitting Bull was Sioux, so that follows. Besides, there are already entire sets of flavour units for both the Iroquois and Sioux, something that can't be said about the other tribes.Native America split into two. Sure, though once you go down that road, you have to consider a half-dozen other major tribes.
Then why not Romania and Canada?America and Arabia being "civs"... depends on your definition of a "civ". In terms of the game, both qualify, I would think.
Yes, Romania had it's own culture, but mostly it was just the melting confluence of Turkish and European influences.
I guess the word "satire" in the label didn't give it away.Regardless, are we going to determine the quality of a civilization by the size of it's military?
Why?!?!?Well, this is silly, I'm sure, but I kinda want the HRE back, while still having Austria. *Shrugs*
Hmmm... so you want to trade in the 2nd (other) German Civ in the game for the 2nd (other) French Civ in the game!I actually would like to have the HRE as well. Except, let's not call it the HRE. Let's call it the Carolingan Empire.
Wodan
I wasn't sure if you meant it as a serious joke, or were offering that as your actual opinion.I guess the word "satire" in the label didn't give it away.
Like the Babylonians and Sumerians? Or the USA and Native Americans?why do we need two Iraqi Civs? I just don't like overlapping civs from the same geographic areas.