Bug reports and technical issues

OK, I was right - SVN sucks!!!
The heck are Chinese doing on the 1700 map???
With all THREE of their goals FAILED by default!?!
Do check others as well - might have some similar nonsensical errors...
 
Considering THEIR goals are SUPPOSED to be completed BEFORE 1700, it's impossible FOR them to not be FAILED. And if there WERE only civs that can STILL complete their UHV on the MAP, it would be very empty.

Also, I LIKE this capitalising RANDOM words thing you'VE got going.
 
OK, I was right - SVN sucks!!!
The heck are Chinese doing on the 1700 map???
With all THREE of their goals FAILED by default!?!
Do check others as well - might have some similar nonsensical errors...

You clearly do not understand much about this mod. Please take the time to read up berfore you continue to post non-sensical dribble in this thread.
 
Please keep me informed about further nonsensical errors.

Make sure to include enough exclamation marks though. I never read posts that have less than 10 exclamation marks.
 
BYE.
Cause when I open a MAP/SCENARIO - I'm EXPECTING to be able to PLAY each and every civilizatio on it.
Just check the original RFC - it didn't have such nonsense, did it?
 
The 1700 scenario isn't finished (not even close), so there are going to be a lot of weird things there. But like the others said, a lot of civs are going to have their UHVs failed because the deadline is simply before 1700. The 600 AD scenario doesn't have this problem, because none of the civs whose UHVs would have already been failed are in that scenario.
 
BYE.
Cause when I open a MAP/SCENARIO - I'm EXPECTING to be able to PLAY each and every civilizatio on it.
Just check the original RFC - it didn't have such nonsense, did it?
Please contact our customer service to receive a refund.
 
Well, civfan613 couldn't find a link in a post with a total of two lines - so I'm not convinced he/she will be able to find 1.11 when available in any case.

I guess my poST didn't have ENough RANdom CAPitaLs or punctuation marks?!??!

It all made for an entertaining interlude to this thread though.
 
I'm also trying to install SVN but when I try to do the SVN checkout it has the acccess denied. should I do this in the ''my games'' folder or the programs archives ? my 1.10DoC is in the program archives
 
I'm also trying to install SVN but when I try to do the SVN checkout it has the acccess denied. should I do this in the ''my games'' folder or the programs archives ? my 1.10DoC is in the program archives

I think the issue might be that you need to have administrator privileges on the folder to which you are going to install the game.
 
You likely need administrator access for that folder.

(Edit: I'm typing too slowly.)
 
Argentine and Brazilian embassies appear in the wonder list in the Civilopedia:

Spoiler :
0D1601CE8E209B4F07F2FDE57076DE10C0BBF863
 
I'm also trying to install SVN but when I try to do the SVN checkout it has the acccess denied. should I do this in the ''my games'' folder or the programs archives ? my 1.10DoC is in the program archives

Do the checkout in any My Documents folder, then copy and paste (or compress and extract) to the program files folder.
 
yeah that's what I did to first install the mod , I remembered it now. too bad I started downloading the checkout in my games but I thought it was wrong and deleted the paste and now I have to re-download it :(

Edit: is there a problem to play the mod while doing the checkout ?
 
First UHV goal for Aztec seemingly didn't check correctly. I'm sat in 1525 with a 16-pop Tenochtitlan and a green-ticked victory condition (since 1515 when I overtook Kyoto) but my score is still 0/3.

Do you need a save file, or is this one of a long list of UHV-checking issues?
 
First UHV goal for Aztec seemingly didn't check correctly. I'm sat in 1525 with a 16-pop Tenochtitlan and a green-ticked victory condition (since 1515 when I overtook Kyoto) but my score is still 0/3.

Do you need a save file, or is this one of a long list of UHV-checking issues?

That UHV goal is working fine for me.
 
Is there not supposed to be a granary in Krakow in the 1700 AD scenario?

edit: Looked into it a little more. I loaded a save from the campaign the turn before I took Krakow and Copenhagen, and these cities did have granaries built. It somehow seems that me conquering the cities causes them to disappear. Should I attach a save file of the newly conquered, granary-free cities?
 
Back
Top Bottom