1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Buildlist spam makes the game less interesting

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Caveman 2 Cosmos' started by MantaRevan, Nov 30, 2013.

  1. Sparth

    Sparth C2C Team Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    2,311
    Huge building lists solved for me problem with city build pop-ups.
     
  2. Azurian

    Azurian The Azurian

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,092
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    The balance tweaks I just added to SVN should cut down on building spam because the Research Rate is higher than the construction rate, unlocking new buildings is alot slower. You might actually end up running out of buildings to build at your Capitol and very large cities :).
     
  3. Faustmouse

    Faustmouse Deity

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    3,522
    That is great if you like very long games (which I do) but if you want to reach ie Medival fast you will find longer research rates quite annoying.
    What happened to the "free at tech" tag and the "free in new cities" tag? I saw that when I found a new city some buildings are already in. :goodjob:
    But free at tech would help newer cities catch up faster. Let's have a look at history:
    Cities like New York, Los Angeles, Bosten are comperently young cities. Nevertheless, they are more known, bigger and such then much older cities. This would be very hard to achieve - if not impossible - in civ. And cities like Dubai, Abu Dhabi and many chinese cities were rather small only 20 years ago. And look at them now!
     
  4. Yudishtira

    Yudishtira Spiritual/Creative

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,764
    Location:
    Brisbane
    But that's because they built Immigrants in - and/or starved and/or demolished all the buildings in - their old cities until there was hardly anyone left...! :p

    You can do that in-game if you really want to...:mischief:
     
  5. manivo

    manivo Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    37
    The main issue for me is that there's a lot of fluff and very little essence. It was mentioned that it's no longer a strategy of what to build but rather in what order to build it, where I usually just instinctively queue up production buildings, then food, then other stuff in whatever way strikes my fancy. The problem is added to considering the interface starts lagging badly when it gets bogged down by a ton of buildings, both taking half a second to update when you add something to the queue, and then also scrolling to the start of the category meaning I need to scroll back down to add the next building in line.

    The thing is though that I never really consider the buildings unique. I never think to myself "Oh neat, a Deli." but rather "Oh neat, a +1 food building". Many times a new research will open up a slew of buildings which basically all serve the same function, like the sports tech - it adds numerous buildings that each add the same health and happiness bonus. It just seems bloated for the sake of bloat, rather than actual gameplay.

    Now for the idea part - many such buildings are not ones a government would normally build itself, but rather free enterprises created by the citizens. A government would build a stadium, but a sporting goods shop would be built by Joe Schmoe.
    So, what if an 'Urban Development' type of property was added? Much like current properties it would cause buildings to autobuild as it hits different levels and requirements. Unlike current properties however it could be more directly affected by the player's decisions -
    Ideally a fourth bar would be added which would allow players to shift funds from research and culture etc to this urban development, representing the government investing in these free enterprises. Civics would affect this property to great extent, and great merchants / special units could give big boosts to this property (or perhaps to specific sectors, instabuilding certain sets of buildings regardless of the urban development property). All those buildings could then be removed from the player's build queue and instead be replaced by buildings that encourage their appearance. Again, this could be done on a per-sector basis or as a unified property.

    Other than clearing up the building queue, this could also add a new mechanic to later games - countries shifting from a government-run economy to a more private-run economy. The buildings built by the citizens would replace the obsolete government-built buildings from earlier eras, trading direct income for other benefits. This would also have the bonus of making money more of an issue in later eras as buildings do not provide direct money anymore. Corporations could then become a much more important player in the game, for the better or for the worse. If the industrial era was about trying to manage rampant pollution, it would slowly shift into the modern era's gameplay of economics.
     
  6. strategyonly

    strategyonly C2C Supreme Commander

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    20,563
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MN
    I "personally" agree, alot of the OLDER buildings, i believe C2C, does NOT need, sorry Hydro. Like the Wares, Flowers, Nuts, see attached could almost get rid of 90% of these here.
     
  7. Thunderbrd

    Thunderbrd C2C War Dog

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    27,802
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    This is exactly how I feel about this subject. You said it brotha'!

    We've discussed something like this before... just a matter of priorities as to what we're developing I'm afraid. I'd like to see something along those lines someday - at least as an option.


    Keep in mind guys... some building lists may be 'lacking unique substance' as has been pointed out. BUT... that doesn't mean they always will. Sometimes it just takes having the established building category infrastructures in place in the mod and then we begin to see other things we can do to make those buildings all the more unique. Take for example the military training centers and what we're looking to do with Ongoing Training. Or Equipment (big one here!) which can really benefit from a bit more 'micro-definitions' of building types to work with when developing what equipments are sourced from what buildings.

    My point is... I don't think it's time yet to start shaving down. However, as usual, the complaints are largely derived from people who aren't yet comfortable or familiar with the queuing mechanism. I rarely ever get a city popping up saying 'what do you want to build next?' because I've plotted those decisions out many rounds in advance. And when something comes up almost all cities would want, shift select on the city bar allows you to manipulate all build queues at once and Ctrl-select on the city bar allows you to manipulate all the build queues on all cities on the same continent at once. Easy once you're used to using it.
     
  8. Dancing Hoskuld

    Dancing Hoskuld Deity

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    23,539
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    :mischief: I had a nasty thought on how we could make c2C insanely complex - introduce Platyping's "quantity goods" but not just for the military normal buildings use and convert them, sink buildings like palaces use them and if you don't have enough...riots:lol:

    Bot something I would even consider working on mind you.
     
  9. manivo

    manivo Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    37
    Been using ctrl-select since ever for that purpose exactly. Somehow missed the shift-select one. On the topic - is there a way to display all of the available buildings in all of the cities when multiple-selecting? It seems to be determined by my capital right now, meaning I either have to postpone building something until every city has built its pre-requirements, or manually go through every city later on.
     
  10. Azurian

    Azurian The Azurian

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,092
    Location:
    Florida, USA

    I'll volunteer myself to a Freeze for a week or three, and focus on building balance.
     
  11. Pepo

    Pepo Prince

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2012
    Messages:
    317
    i think that the problem is that there are too many cheap and repetitive bonus buildings (the one gold buildings for example) and only a few that requiere some kind of decision (money/crime buildings, science buildings) and even then is not a problem because is easy to counter those problems.i would really like less buildings but more decissions
     
  12. Sgtslick

    Sgtslick Emperor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    1,685
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I don't really see queuing and shift clicking huge build lists as a solution personally. It makes the game monotonous and removes some of the strategy. When every city builds a lot of the same buildings (most of them), sometimes you just wish you could fast forward the game till when some of these build queues are finished.

    I think having options is great, and choosing between these options is what makes it 'strategy'. When all you have to do is shift click through them all, its dumb.
     
  13. Maxima7

    Maxima7 Warlord

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2013
    Messages:
    118
    You don't necessarily have to get rid of all of them. You could make them auto-build after meeting certain criteria.
     
  14. RidetheSpiral23

    RidetheSpiral23 C2C Map Team

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    387
    Totally agree. It reduces civ strategy to queue buildings...wonder...one or two military units...queue buildings...

    That's not even an exaggeration. This many building completely reduces the overall strategy of the game. It needs to be changed.
     
  15. Sgtslick

    Sgtslick Emperor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2002
    Messages:
    1,685
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Yes this would be ideal, take all of the +1 (something) buildings and make them like the realistic corporations function. Somewhat random but mainly dependant on your government choices, war, resources, happiness, city size, culture etc.

    Then with all the left over buildings you can boost the cost of them right up and it will feel like civ again, players will be forced to choose definitive paths towards there goals. Such as- I will build this city up to get stables and riding school and some production stuff and build horse troops out of here. As opposed to, ill queue up 100+ buildings and then be ready to use this city..
     
  16. Hydromancerx

    Hydromancerx C2C Modder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,281
    Location:
    California, USA
    As long as I am around there will be no "shaving down" of buildings. From the beginning of modding I wanted to get to this level of buildings. It took many months and some help but overall I am extremely happy with the variety of buildings we have. As you said we finally have a base line for some interesting stuff. And for people use to vanilla civ4 or even civ5 I can see where they get overwhelmed. However C2C is WAY beyond those types of games. You got to ave the mindset of say Sim City where there are a lot of buildings, and of those many similar ones. Also we have many dependency buildings similar to the Anno series.

    I also think that people think that there are more building than there really is. At any given point in the game there are many factors that unlock a building. Tech, resources, culture, city size, religion, etc. And not all buildings last forever either. And buildings can unlock other buildings too so a city may have a more limited amount of buildings than you would think.

    i also think that many people who complain about too many buildings are not using the building filters or are playing on a speed that is much too fast. Heck even having unlimited wonders can skew your view since you would have so many wonders listed to build since there is no limit to remove them from the list of building to build when you reach the max amount.

    Note I do have a few ideas on how to make thing run smoother for buildings, but I not sure which I should use yet.
     
  17. teakbois

    teakbois Prince

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2012
    Messages:
    305
    How about this for a possible way to reduce the building spam

    Two new types of buildings: Supply buildings and export buildings

    Supply buildings: There are tons of buildings that give resources. For example, paper maker. Supplies paper. you end up with one in every city, and you end up with 30 copies of paper.

    Why not just have one paper maker for the entire civilization? Jack up the hammer cost and if it makes sense give each city a bonus. For instance, a winery might provide a culture boost to all cities. So instead of building something in each city, you just build it once at a far greater cost but every city benefits.

    Export buildings can also be built once per civilization. These can grant a commerce or gold boost to that particular city. Or perhaps add trade routes. So if you had two grapes, you could make a winery ofr your civilization, and a winery export. they wouldnt give the resource to other civs, you would still be able to trade raw materials. You wouldnt be able to trade this finished good (wine), but if you had multiples you could trade the resource (grapes) so that civ could build a winery.
     
  18. Hydromancerx

    Hydromancerx C2C Modder

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,281
    Location:
    California, USA
    The things is the Paper Maker also is providing you with :gold: and sometime producting buildings also have a down side the more you make. Not to mention there has been talks for ages about having resources have a quantity for things. So I would like to keep that window open the the possibility of a supply line type of system.

    At any rate I have some other ideas I am trying to work out that you guy might like. So stay tuned. ;)
     
  19. strategyonly

    strategyonly C2C Supreme Commander

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    20,563
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    MN
    See i like this, talking things out, then having more ideas how to do things, this is what i am talking about !! :)
     
  20. JosEPh_II

    JosEPh_II TBS WarLord

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,205
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Western IL. cornfields
    @Hydro,
    Gamespeed isn't that much of a problem. I play Normal and Epic and don't have the problems that this thread's OP and others are complaining about.

    It's play style and adjusting that play style that these poster having problems need to reconsider.

    Even sgtslick needs to too.
    You would never que up this exaggerated number (100). Again here is an example of a short sighted playstyle of "I have to have cities that have a Defined role". This one only builds military, and this one is only research, etc.. Your cities need to be fluid to adapt to the constantly changing environment. The stated playstyle is fine for vanilla BtS but not for C2C. Adapt your playstyle, it might hurt for awhile but you'll be a better player for it.

    JosEPh
     

Share This Page