strijder20
Wallowing in irony
Nice reference to 'Also sprach Zarathustra'.Also sprach al-Mahdi
Very nice round too. But why do you burn all those cities? You'll get their cultures, and garrisons will tune down revolutions usually.
Nice reference to 'Also sprach Zarathustra'.Also sprach al-Mahdi
But why do you burn all those cities? You'll get their cultures, and garrisons will tune down revolutions usually.
Nice reference to 'Also sprach Zarathustra'.
Very nice round too. But why do you burn all those cities? You'll get their cultures, and garrisons will tune down revolutions usually.
Does it not get annoying settling cities with no idea where loads of resources are?
I have several reasons for burning cities.
1. Garrisons can hold revolting troops at bay, but revolting cities tend to spawn reinforcements--and there are usually a lot more reinforcements than the original revolution.
2. I'm trying to stay mobile with my wars. I don't usually have the garrison troops available. The troops that burn a city can stay moving onto the next one.
3. I tend to have issues with AI city placement. I like to plot out my city placements and when the AI builds their cities in nearby locations, I like to raze them and put my cities where I think they should be founded.
Edit: 4. I also get slave units for burning cities. It's usually 1 slave per 2 population points of the city burned. Granted, this only lasts as long as I'm running Slavery -- but I keep the slave units after I change civics. I wind up using slaves to build Wonders into the Industrial era.
I'm gonna use this as a reference guide to C2C if I ever decide to wreck my comp by useing it
4. Why do you sacrifice them? Imagine settling 20 slaves in the same city as citizensshouldn't that give a runaway effect? With more slaves settled, you can produce more troops, which can capture more slaves - and so on.
My Great Prophet this time is Nietzche.
Monarchy still gives you angry people, right?