I know the team isn't big on things after the medieval period, but I expected Mormonism to be at least fixed for the 37 update.
An explanation as to what needs fixing may be useful. If from a previous post please quote it.
I know the team isn't big on things after the medieval period, but I expected Mormonism to be at least fixed for the 37 update.
I have done a number of fixes but the person who was working with me stopped part the way through.I know the team isn't big on things after the medieval period, but I expected Mormonism to be at least fixed for the 37 update.
The buildings have a detrimental ban. On of them banned books in the past, which was a clear mistake. I don't think any of the city wide bans were intentional. The tea ban is ban obsolete AFAIK because Mormons mostly adhere to modern concepts of health. A lazy solution would to be to replace the resources with hard drugs. I like the idea of a giant pink cathedral purging the drug dealers.An explanation as to what needs fixing may be useful. If from a previous post please quote it.
Well... the actual prohibition among the Mormon faith is against Hot Drinks. This means tea and coffee and hot chocolate, but does not mean caffeine, which is why the Coca-Cola company is largely owned by Mormons. It has nothing to do with health - just that it is served hot. The texts do not try to justify the edict further than that. Many practitioners of the faith tend to either write off the edict or rationalize it AS a health based instruction and re-interpret it for themselves to mean one thing or another but literally... it's just that irrational. Hot Drink.The tea ban is ban obsolete AFAIK because Mormons mostly adhere to modern concepts of health.
The point is that it's not widely practice, and consuming only healthy substances is one of the foundation commandments in Mormonism(call the Word of Wisdom). The Book of Mormon isn't typically considered the last word. The verse on hot drink isn't even agreed upon in it's meaning of hot drink, which may refer to a specific tea plant.Well... the actual prohibition among the Mormon faith is against Hot Drinks. This means tea and coffee and hot chocolate, but does not mean caffeine, which is why the Coca-Cola company is largely owned by Mormons. It has nothing to do with health - just that it is served hot. The texts do not try to justify the edict further than that. Many practitioners of the faith tend to either write off the edict or rationalize it AS a health based instruction and re-interpret it for themselves to mean one thing or another but literally... it's just that irrational. Hot Drink.
That prohibitions affect the entire city rather than a portion of the city is part of what makes it a little tough to work with Mormonism as a religion. However, there are game engine limitations. Mormonism, if I'm not mistaken, was given some powerful unusually strong benefits for a religion to compensate.The point is that it's not widely practice, and consuming only healthy substances is one of the foundation commandments in Mormonism(call the Word of Wisdom). The Book of Mormon isn't typically considered the last word. The verse on hot drink isn't even agreed upon in it's meaning of hot drink, which may refer to a specific tea plant.
Islam doesn't have any such prohibition of pork in C2C. Even if they did, then the logic wouldn't work for Mormonism because so many mormons don't practice the Hot Drink thing and the church doesn't do anything about the numerous tea drinking bishops.That prohibitions affect the entire city rather than a portion of the city is part of what makes it a little tough to work with Mormonism as a religion. However, there are game engine limitations.
Mormonism, if I'm not mistaken, was given some powerful unusually strong benefits for a religion to compensate.
You make a good point that many other religions also have bans that should be as or more reflected. Hinduism with cows for example. And as an argument it makes sense that removing the penalty/penalties would make some sense. I think I argued that myself a while back.Islam doesn't have any such prohibition of pork in C2C. Even if they did, then the logic wouldn't work for Mormonism because so many mormons don't practice the Hot Drink thing and the church doesn't do anything about the numerous tea drinking bishops.
Exactly... it's the benefit per city in the Shrine that makes Mormonism pretty awesome.There is nothing like that in the game. Module?
I just noticed: "Morman" Shrine?
It never ever did this. It always used books, it never baned them, ever!The buildings have a detrimental ban..
It never ever did this. It always used books, it never baned them, ever!
8102
Remove excess old art schema files.
Fix Mormon building to require books not ban them.
Adjust the names of Voodoo units and buildings (text changes only)
This still makes a missionary a one shot thing. It is just that they sometimes return home as another type of unit which is also one shot.I like a lot of that too DH. IMO, in a best case future, Missionaries are not one shot units but work like LE or Healers to add a persistent source of Idea influence where stationed - and different buildups for different potential ways they can help the city could be cool with that.
This seem very odd because New York state has a very low concentration of Mormons, despite that being where the religion was founded. Mormons don't have a holy city, but I think the previously LDS Conference Center in Salt Lake City fits the qualification of a shrine quite easily. Twice a year, Mormons have General Conference, which is broadcasted on Sunday as the replacement for church for those weeks. It could be the main shrine that CANNOT be built where the religion was founded. Two shrines are okay if the benefits are split enough, right?Exactly... it's the benefit per city in the Shrine that makes Mormonism pretty awesome.
Well, most of our religions have an extra wonder. Shrines and the tags they utilize follow stock coding rules that enforce that it's where the religion was founded. If you get too zoomed in on any religion, take Islam for example, there are multiple holy cities for different reasons, founding not always being the cause. (Almost rarely actually)Two shrines are okay if the benefits are split enough, right?
It is possible to have many extra wonders and you can make them act like shrines do for the other religions because it is just XML.I have some gameplay related ideas for the mormon religion. It's power would be to expand into wilderness, much like the actual religion did. The distribution of mormons today still reflect that history. I previously mention an idea of Mormon Pioneers that founds Mormon cities, there could also be mormon immigants. Mormons missionaries can be sent to rather inhospitable places.
This seem very odd because New York state has a very low concentration of Mormons, despite that being where the religion was founded. Mormons don't have a holy city, but I think the previously LDS Conference Center in Salt Lake City fits the qualification of a shrine quite easily. Twice a year, Mormons have General Conference, which is broadcasted on Sunday as the replacement for church for those weeks. It could be the main shrine that CANNOT be built where the religion was founded. Two shrines are okay if the benefits are split enough, right?
I don't think dozens of minor gold calculations should represent eating habits. , , and from ice cream is more appropriate for a game. The dietary requirements of the Word of Wisdom have given a larger life expectancy through avoidable cause of death, although Mormons have not avoided obesity as a group so it wouldn't be overpowered levels of . As Word of Wisdom(law) for state religion might be implement to ban coffee.
There's a world wonder which acts as a second shrine to your state religion, unless I'm remember wrong. Making a second shrine should be a matter of knowing which XML file to look in.Well, most of our religions have an extra wonder. Shrines and the tags they utilize follow stock coding rules that enforce that it's where the religion was founded. If you get too zoomed in on any religion, take Islam for example, there are multiple holy cities for different reasons, founding not always being the cause. (Almost rarely actually)
I have to wonder if overfocusing on any religion developments may impede DH too much on some of his plans to reshape the concept of religions as a whole.
With special rules. Defining them as a shrine means they can be made by prophets in the holy city. Also means they can use a special tag for commerce per city with their religion.Shrines are just buildings