CFC Pick'em 2016-2017

caketastydelish said:
Seattle @ Atlanta, Atlanta by 4.5
Seahawks win. Although, I would have said that even if you moved the decimal point of the 4 to the right. And by this point, you all know it.
Houston @ New England, New England by 15
Patriots don't cover. It's dangerous to be overconfident, and the Texans are looking for revenge. Osweiler has also been playing much better lately. I don't think it will be enough for the Texans to win, but enough for them to be respectable opponents.
Sunday, 1/15
Green Bay @ Dallas, Dallas by 4.5
Packers win. Not only for emotional reasons (Seahawks would get homefield advantage against Packers in the playoffs but not Cowboys) but because the Packers have been incredible lately.
Pittsburgh @ Kansas City, Kansas City by 1.5
Steelers win. I already said before the beginning of the season that the Steelers would show up at the Super Bowl. Might as well stick with it. And the Chiefs will surely put up more of a fight than the Dolphins, but it's hard to see them actually winning. I would put the Steelers against any AFC team other than perhaps the Patriots. Even then, they have a chance.
Click to expand...
 

Saturday, 1/14
Seattle @ Atlanta, Atlanta by 4.5 Falcons cover
Houston @ New England, New England by 15 Pats cover

Sunday, 1/15
Green Bay @ Dallas, Dallas by 4.5 Packers win
Pittsburgh @ Kansas City, Kansas City by 1.5 Chiefs cover
 
SEA win
NE cov
GB win
KC cov
 
Saturday, 1/14
Seattle @ Atlanta, Atlanta by 4.5 Falcons cover
Houston @ New England, New England by 15 Pats don't cover

Sunday, 1/15
Green Bay @ Dallas, Dallas by 4.5 Packers win
Pittsburgh @ Kansas City, Kansas City by 1.5 Chiefs cover
 
Playoffs Week 3 Spreads

Sunday, 1/22
Green Bay @ Atlanta, Atlanta by 5
Pittsburgh @ New England, New England by 6
 
He's deviating from the proven successful tactic. Don't think at all about your pick. Don't even watch the games. Just channel your inner Colin Cowherd and take the first, hottest, spiciest pick'em take that comes to mind.
 
Sommerswerd said:
I'm testing my theory this week that when ctd gives a qualifier/explanation/commentary for his pick, it turns out to be wrong. That has been my (non-scientific) observation this season.:p
Click to expand...

So, scientifically...

Are you counting "Aaron Rodgers would make a good sugar daddy" as qualifier, explanation, or commentary for his pick? Or is this a pick you would expect him to get right?
 
Timsup2nothin said:
So, scientifically...

Are you counting "Aaron Rodgers would make a good sugar daddy" as qualifier, explanation, or commentary for his pick? Or is this a pick you would expect him to get right?
Click to expand...
The former, as in the comment about Rodgers counts as commentary, so I am expecting the football gods to punish him with a Packers win... if that is a scientific enough explanation.
 
Sommerswerd said:
The former, as in the comment about Rodgers counts as commentary, so I am expecting the football gods to punish him with a Packers win... if that is a scientific enough explanation.
Click to expand...

I suppose it will do. I was just unsure about how sugar daddy related to the pick itself.
 
GB wins
NE covers
 
Pick'Em Fun Times Bonus Round FINAL WEEK

Sunday, 2/5
New England @ Atlanta, New England by 3
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sommerswerd
  • Poll Poll
Who Are You Picking To Win The Superbowl? - Superbowl 59
2
Replies
21
Views
773
KMRblue1027
KMRblue1027
Quintillus
NCAA Football Thread - 2024
4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
5K
Sommerswerd
Sommerswerd
Sommerswerd
  • Poll Poll
Who Are You Picking To Win The Superbowl? - Superbowl 58
2
Replies
22
Views
2K
Gori the Grey
Gori the Grey
aelf
[1.0.1 Patch 3] Another civ picking the Great Work benefit for suzerainty unslots your free Great Work
Replies
0
Views
185
aelf
aelf
sTAPler27
The Civ/Leader Pairings Could Use Some Tweaks
Replies
5
Views
471
Ryansinbela
Ryansinbela
Back
Top Bottom