The moderate normie checked out on this issue days ago
Probably, but also probably not before checking out a couple of clips. Guess we'll see if they agree they're as horrible as some people say.The moderate normie checked out on this issue days ago
Probably, but also probably not before checking out a couple of clips. Guess we'll see if they agree they're as horrible as some people say.
Do you agree with Charlie Kirk that we should repeal the civil rights act?
See the wild thing about me is that I can do a couple of things that I think many folks here struggle with:
1. I can do a modicum of research and see if a guy, for example, really hates empathy like the soundbite says, or if he actually said he prefers sympathy; and
2. I can find common ground with him on other stuff even if I don't agree with him on everything.
Haven't really looked and seen what his take is on the civil rights act but I'll bet it doesn't boil down as simply as you'd present with a yes/no question, and even if I disagreed with his take, there's still point 2 above.
The moderate normie checked out on this issue days ago
So they are going to dismantle the White House?Vance announces on Charlie Kirk's platform that they've found their Reichstag Fire moment.
So I asked AI to help me find the full length text or audio of what your article is referring to and it couldn't. If you have it, I'll read it and let you know.I'm just asking if you agree or disagree with the following:
So I asked AI to help me find the full length text or audio of what your article is referring to and it couldn't. If you have it, I'll read it and let you know.
Spoiler :
Well see the thing is I skimmed your article and saw it quoted him a few times, but I want the full length text because an author can selectively quote people however they like to make the point they'd like. Not exactly an uncommon thing. So I was trying to find the full-length unedited text to see if the author did a fair job or not. This doesn't seem like an unreasonable request on my part but take your jabs as you do.Why are you asking AI for stuff that I already did the work of putting in front of you? Do you lack confidence in your ability to read?
Vance announces on Charlie Kirk's platform that they've found their Reichstag Fire moment.
Well see the thing is I skimmed your article and saw it quoted him a few times, but I want the full length text because an author can selectively quote people however they like to make the point they'd like. Not exactly an uncommon thing. So I was trying to find the full-length unedited text to see if the author did a fair job or not. This doesn't seem like an unreasonable request on my part but take your jabs as you do.
Sir, you have nearly 34,000 posts. I barely knew who Charlie Kirk was a week agoThis is derived from Wired reporting that was confirmed on the record by Kirk, as quoted in what I shared. This is a great microcosm of our time though: even as Charlie Kirk and TPUSA trumpeted their opposition to civil rights and MLK, even as your fellow right-winger in this thread just goes "yep I agree with Charlie Kirk that the civil rights act was bad", you find a way to throw up your hands and pretend it's just unknowable without more context.
Here's the Wired article. I don't expect it to change your mind, I present it simply so others can see just how absurd it is that you're pretending Kirk's view on this is not known to us.
I assure you, I am not up to speed on everything he has said or done. “The courts have been really weak on this,” Kirk told the America Fest crowd. “Federal courts just yield to the Civil Rights Act as if it's the actual American Constitution.” The law is ultimately a way to “re-found the county” and “a way to get rid of the First Amendment,” according to Kirk.
Sir, you have nearly 34,000 posts. I barely knew who Charlie Kirk was a week agoI assure you, I am not up to speed on everything he has said or done.