[RD] Charlie Kirk assassinated

Bottom line is that most of the US's problems is that it is a 2-party system and both parties are bought and owned by the same interests. Not to mention totally stagnant. Both the Republican and Democrat parties need to be torn down and rebuilt from the ground up.
No, what needs to be torn down is the "first past the pole" system. The rest should come on its own shortly thereafter - which is why it's unlikely to change.
 
It only gets worse, Miller now has his Reichstag Fire moment. Allowing them to brand anyone left of the current admin as Terrorists™. As per Project 2025

It looks like the original plan was to use Operation Arctic Frost as a pretext to investigate the entire left wing.

If Biden did it to the entire right wing, why not retaliate?


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed Tuesday that the FBI's election-related investigation into President Donald Trump, launched in 2022, swept in dozens of Republican entities, including the late Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.

Speaking during a hearing focused on oversight of the FBI, Grassley said the investigation, which the bureau called "Arctic Frost," was partisan in nature and that its expansive scope was evidence of that.

Bonus points for getting Charlie Kirk in the 1st paragraph I guess.

"In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump," Grassley said. "It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus."

The last time the American people were feeling maximum emotion, the government reached into a drawer and pulled out the Patriot Act.

I think this time Congress will have little involvement.

It will be all Pam Bondi.


President Donald Trump said Monday he’d consider naming far-left anti-fascism group Antifa as domestic terrorists, previewing a plan to crack down on what he’s cast as a widespread network of left-wing radicals inciting violence.

“It’s something I would do, yeah,” he said when asked whether he would assign a domestic terrorism label to Antifa, saying he would proceed if he found support from Cabinet officials and the Justice Department.

It wasn’t clear who or what exactly Trump would designate; Antifa is a loosely organized movement without a distinct leader, membership lists or structure.

I know the terrorists sailing speedboats somewhere north of Venezuela have no human rights at all.
 
SCOTUS has declared that money is speech and any amount can be spent in elections with donors kept secret.
Next up: Stand your ground expanded: Shooting people who threaten your culture is free speech. 1st and 2nd Amendments merged.
 
My love, I write to inform you that my return to you might well prove to be delayed by some indeterminable passage of time. It shan’t be long until the two of us can reunite, but before we do, I must retrieve my firearm. There is a matter I had intended to safeguard as the profoundest secret until I should reach the end of my years, but it regrettably proves that I must involve you in this affair.

You are not indicating to me that you are the one who shot Charlie Kirk, are you?

Let me state in no ambiguous terms that I indeed am. I apologize profusely for any vexatious consequences this might occasion for you, my sweeting.

I thought the police had apprehended a suspect.

Yes, dear one, to a superficial outward view that might seem to have been the case; however, the person they apprehended in fact has no connection with the shooting whatsoever. Moreover, a second person fell under their suspicion simply because he was appareled in clothing similar to my own. I had planned to retrieve the weapon with which—again let me state clearly—I carried out the murder of Charlie Kirk from my drop point shortly thereupon, but most of that side of town was under surveillance. It is quiet—almost, one might say, quiet enough for a person to make an escape, but there is one vehicle lingering.

Why?

Why did I commit the murder of Charlie Kirk? Is that what you are asking?

Yes.

I had come to have my fill—yea, to the point of oversaturation—of the man’s animosity. There are some occasions on which negotiation is of no avail. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. I am setting forth to retrieve it again, in the hope that law enforcement might have vacated the area. The news has not informed me that the murder weapon has been located.

How long have you been deliberately premeditating this heinous crime?

To the best of my recollection, inamorata, for approximately one half of a fortnight. I believe I can get close to the weapon, although a vehicle belonging to law enforcement idles nearby.

I now find myself in the position of regretting that I had not, previously, through a circuitous perambulation, retrieved the weapon that I employed in the murder of Charlie Kirk.

That firearm, belonging as it did to my forebearers, will be of particular interest to my father (or “old man,” as a person of that familial relation has not in common parlance been denominated for well-nigh fifty years).

Let me also take this as the occasion, though completely unprompted, to indicate to you that the public might soon come to be bewildered by a set of engravings on the munitions I employed. My motivation in so inscribing the items in question was simply so that I could find amusement in those commenting on the matter being compelled to employ an idiom unfamiliar to them.

Since you and I have had no previous occasion to discuss this matter, I want to say to you that, dating from the election of our current president, my father has been wildly enamored of the man. I just suddenly desired to communicate that to you, a propos of nothing at all.

It is good that we have thus spoken to one another in an manner that is perfectly natural for individuals of our era who have reached that stage of maturation to which the two of us have arrived. All of my concerns center on you, dearest.

On the contrary, I am stricken with the profoundest apprehension on your behalf.

If you are questioned by law enforcement, secure an attorney.
Tell me this is verbatim.
 
Next up: Stand your ground expanded: Shooting people who threaten your culture is free speech. 1st and 2nd Amendments merged.
is that your opinion or...?
 
is that your opinion or...?
It where I think MAGA wants to go. Trump has said he will go after people who speak ill of him. Why are all the right wing militias fully armed? Why was Jan 6 supposed to be the Proud Boys etc. launching point against the left. Maga wants nothing more than to be able to shoot anyone who would keep them from losing power. Clarence Thomas would love to lay the groundwork for a way to tie the first two amendments so that shooting ones political enemies is legal. As Trump's personal police force, ICE already has that authority. The next step will be" defend National Security against the internal enemy ("the Left") with bullets. Charlie Kirk's death proves they are all terrorists.
 
1. A not small number of conservatives openly challenging Israel and what they're doing in Gaza and elsewhere;
2. A not small number of conservatives giving Trump absolute hell for how he's handling Epstein;
3. A not small number of conservatives giving Pam Bondi absolute hell for her ridiculous remarks on hate speech;
4. A not small number of conservatives very much being open to the possibility that this assassination wasn't done in the way claimed that, let's face it, completely helps them.

Screenshot_20250917_130933_Chrome.jpg
 
SCOTUS has declared that money is speech and any amount can be spent in elections with donors kept secret.
Next up: Stand your ground expanded: Shooting people who threaten your culture is free speech. 1st and 2nd Amendments merged.
Money is speech and speech is free => free is money.
Congratulations, you have just annihilated capitalism :woohoo:
 
Tell me this is verbatim.
I can't tell you that because I don't quite know what you are asking.

It was a little parody I worked up based on Steve Bannon's observation that the e-mail exchange between Robinson and his love seemed "stilted."

I just amped the stiltedness up a notch. Or several, probably. But once you know that about its starting premise, there's an extra bit of fun in there for anyone who reads closely.
 
Tell me this is verbatim.

CNN has the text conversation.
I'm not sure if it is a direct source (original) or something they transcribed on their own. :dunno:

**Edit**
It seems to be the real deal filed in court.
CNN worked it up a tiny bit to make it look like a real text exchange?
All the words are the same.



**Edit2**
The shooter had a 4.0 GPA in high school and more importantly a 32 or 33 out of 35 on the ACT.
Have to be really good at, uh, everything to score that high.
Not just math, but an English nerd too.

A text conversation with proper punctuation isn't impossible here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't tell you that because I don't quite know what you are asking.

It was a little parody I worked up based on Steve Bannon's observation that the e-mail exchange between Robinson and his love seemed "stilted."

I just amped the stiltedness up a notch. Or several, probably. But once you know that about its starting premise, there's an extra bit of fun in there for anyone who reads closely.
I didn’t read the original just a tiny bit, I couldn’t tell the difference :lol:
 
Bethesda under fire because Charlie Kirk fans hated on a promo of Indiana Jones asking a cat if it doesn't like fascists in first person in the recent game.

I love whenever fascists just straight up out themselves whenever their ideology gets mentioned in video games.
 
to have minions destroy others as he becomes a "god" with monopoly on AI control of those who survive .

Both he and Vance are in it for the money. Thiel is not rich enough and Vance needs his money and influence to be president. Thiel is rich enough to avoid any anti gay blowback and as long as Trump and Vance give him business and tax incentives, he doesn't care.

Peter Thiel is playing highlander and thinks he's faster than the fascists he employs. His goals are insane. He seeks world domination, and the escape of mortality. The guy's nuts, but better poised than almost everyone for his wacky goals.

i just scroll up, r16 actually said it more clearly than I did.

Thank you for your comments on Peter Thiel.

These descriptions of him remind me of a billionaire in a Sci-Fi book, I cannot quite remember the name of...
 
you won't be able to do anything about that as nobody is ever getting immortal . And yes , ı do hate that Chatgto or gtp advert that fills half my tablet screen even after ı logged in , just writing this ...
 
Back
Top Bottom